Great job GT-R! What about Z?

Weren't they testing a baby Z? Now an affordable car that is smaller, lighter, and has more horse power than the current Z would sell thousands.

— investor27 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/21/2007 9:41:43 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Nissan may have built a car around a gigantic engine, but they sure can't design a body or interior worth a damn.

— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/21/2007 10:25:44 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -11   

I'd like to spologize to all other posters/contributors on this blog, for the OC excrescence that is EL34. I assure you, the rest of us Californians or even Americans aren't like this garbage. We can actually trace a car's history and recognize the design goals, ably met, with the GTR's undiluted, attack-jet design.
This is not your average real estate brokers machine- the ubiquitous Lexus is.
EL-34- real estate down ain't it lately? No wonder you've allthis extra time to post ten times a day on how ugly the GTR is. I can only imagine what you yourself look like, you republican lowlife.

— Lyall (View Profile)

Posted on 10/21/2007 11:01:38 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6   

"There will also be a good possibility NISSAN comes up with a model targeting at 7:50 lap time. What would that be? Turbocharged Z?"

I think that would be called the Too-Close-to-GT-R.

— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 10/22/2007 12:34:50 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

Nissan 350z still has a long way to compete with the Porsche. After owning a Anniversary edition, bad ride comfort, heavy car, so so handling and performance. Visually exterior is a nice transformation from the past ( after all they did good on first years sales, i think strictly on looks ) Interior was bad, the design was a decent effort but layout was bad on a manual. Currently i own a Porsche Cayman S. Nissan has a long way to catch up. The currenty FM setup on 350z is junk, every bump you tackle feels like a smack to your face. Backing up with the 350Z you cant see much. Ride comfort was bad, run over ants and you can hear their screams in the car. Porsche cant be compared with a 350Z just on price range alone, does'nt have the bling of Ferrari,but you can really tell the engineers tackle as much small details as they can. Comfort, Handling, Drivability. As for GTR attacking the U.S. and going against Top end cars, i appauld it. Making the top end cars work alittle harder and drop pricing alittle more =) Paddle shifter on a GTR? The majority of targeted consumers i think would want to see a manual on a GTR.
For now my money is saved up for a upcoming 911 turbo see what Porsche have to offer.

— Motorhead (View Profile)

Posted on 10/22/2007 12:24:14 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

what about reviving the silvia/240SX?

— Htay7500 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/22/2007 3:34:48 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

I don't think 7:50 is close to GT-R at all, and that's why I submit this article and question. Any MFR, or player of GT4 on PS3, will kill for 3 seconds in Nürburgring, let alone 15 seconds.

Anyway I just found something interesting. The official lap time of current 350Z is tested by German magazine, Sport Auto, in 03:

8:26 - Nissan 350Z (Sport Auto 10/03)

While they also tested Cayman S in 06:

8:25 - Porsche Cayman S (Sport Auto 11/06)

Sport Auto Nürburgring lap time is usually performed by their editor-in-chief, Horst von Saurma, who held 7:32 lap time on Carrera GT.

Maybe 350Z already can run as fast as Cayman in a skilled driver, if not in the hand of Walter Roehrl.

— dlin (View Profile)

Posted on 10/23/2007 2:57:54 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3