SHARE THIS ARTICLE

I reviewed the 2 litre front-wheel-drive version a few months ago and I liked it very much. So you’d expect me to rave about the much faster four-wheel-drive V6 I’ve been using this past week.

Hmmm, well . . . the base car develops a murderous 197bhp, whereas the V6 delivers a creamy and interesting 247bhp. But you’d be surprised at how similar the two feel in terms of outright get-up-and-go.

Yes, the V6 gets from rest to 62mph in 5.9sec but the base car is there just half a second later. And it’s a similar story at the top end, where the V6 can do 155mph — just 6mph more than the front-driver.

nd it’s the same story with handling. Of course the V6 has four-wheel drive, which affords you a lot more grip, but curiously the front-driver is more rewarding and actually better to drive. It certainly is if you spec it up with the optional electromagnetic suspension, without which the V6 felt — dare I say it — a little crude and jiggly



Full 2006 LA Auto Show photos (click the link below)

2006 LA Auto Show Photo Gallery

AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries



Read Article


Jermy Clarkson Tests the Audi TT 3.2 Liter

About the Author

Agent009