omarrana
omarrana
I hooked up my accelerator to my brake lights. I hit the gas, people behind me stop, and I'm gone.
View My AgentPage

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Tags: Mercedes

Tag Link: Mercedes

Acceptance is the 1st step to recovery: Mercedes fesses up R-class is a failure
Daimler head honchos, like CEO Dieter Zetsche are starting to admit that the R-class hasn’t been selling as expected. The next R-class could be a similar type vehicle or something completely different at this point.

Zetsche blames the crossover segment, saying it hasn’t developed as planned. We think the ugly looks and minivan-meets-boring-wagon-like proportions... Read Article
Acceptance is the 1st step to recovery: Mercedes fesses up R-class is a failure



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/16/2008 11:36:17 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I already read this on a different blog.

They are NOT actually admitting this car is a failure.

Here is what struck me:

"Zetsche blames the crossover segment, saying it hasn’t developed as planned."

Huh. Is that so? So it has nothing to do with the CAR ITSELF, but the segment it's in? SO even though crossover sales have had double- or even triple-digit percent increases over the last five years, and a flash flood of new contenders, it's the segment's fault that the R-Class didn't sell well?

I hope that's not a sign of how Mercedes really thinks. I want to see a brand that can actually admit mistakes.

reply to this comment
_43LE_43LE - 1/16/2008 11:55:09 AM
+5 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"Zetsche blames the crossover segment, saying it hasn’t developed as planned."

I guess that it's nice political way of saying that they made a mistake in planning.


pacotacololpacotacolol - 1/16/2008 3:35:10 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
the R was never good. it did not appeal to us. the GLK will probably tak its place.


MercBasherMercBasher - 1/17/2008 8:06:45 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
My guess is that Mercedes did not expect so many competitors would have very good cross-over products, and thought that Mercedes would have a much higher share of the market. Don't forget the Chrysler Patheticar also had disappointing sales in this segment at a much lower price point.






SevorbeupstryIsBackSevorbeupstryIsBack - 1/19/2008 9:31:08 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It's a failure.

But it is actually a very good car.


LexSucksLexSucks - 1/16/2008 11:58:14 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I always thought that the R-Class looked like a minivan. I dont think that people purchase minivans from MB here in the U.S.

reply to this comment
Htay7500Htay7500 - 1/16/2008 2:54:11 PM
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
seriously, there are better options than this... thing. even the lambdas are a much better buy. buying it for the badge makes NO SENSE.

reply to this comment
LexSucksLexSucks - 1/17/2008 10:12:06 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Premium touring mini-van

reply to this comment
autoproautopro - 1/16/2008 12:41:56 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Its a POS just like most Mercedes,they have serious reliability problems,people are tired of the time it takes runing back to their overloaded service departments.

reply to this comment
MercBasherMercBasher - 1/17/2008 8:08:38 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Agreed the reliability of the R Class is shocking. However the reliability for the ML and GL are equally bad and yet they sell at higher prices than the R Class despite being less suitable for most families.


MadibaPMadibaP - 1/18/2008 3:19:15 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Never underestimate the power of illusion. Many people see a big Merc with a big price and think it MUST be good. They have all been more junk than good for about 25 years now. Through most of the 90 and ford was better!


w209w114w209w114 - 1/16/2008 12:48:06 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
They should refresh and redo the entire exterior by making it more aggresive and sleeker. The interior can remain if they want to save money. New headlights, hood, grille, and bumpers would help it tremendously.

reply to this comment
M35MTM35MT - 1/16/2008 1:16:53 PMView My AgentSpace
+5 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Ugliest Mercedes ever. I like their utility van more, at least that has some character.

reply to this comment
Jag_xfrJag_xfr - 1/16/2008 1:47:12 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
R Class = worlds ugliest machine!!!

reply to this comment
bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 1/16/2008 2:00:08 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
the R class was a good idea, oddly enough its only real competitor was the Cadillac SRX which also doesnt sell well. It seems to have inspired other manfucturers because now BMW, and Toyota, and im sure others are producing cars similar in concept to the R class, i guess they feel they can sell the idea if Mercedes cant.

reply to this comment
PlanBPlanB - 1/16/2008 2:15:33 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I also think the R Class could've been a good idea, but MB just designed it poorly from the inside out. I mean, not even the option for a 3rd row? No hidden away storage holes like most every other minivan has? Not to mention the level of quality is lacking compared to their other models. The execution and attention to detail for this car just needs to be better next time around.

reply to this comment
RupertRupert - 1/16/2008 7:11:10 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
There is a 3rd row what are you talking about?
But originally it was a 6 seater AWD only, now in the Uk at least we can get 5, 6, or 7 seats with RWD on the smaller engines.


Htay7500Htay7500 - 1/16/2008 2:42:12 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
too fugly to begin with. looks like a fish. at least its commercial van had style like M35 said.

reply to this comment
StickShiftCamryStickShiftCamry - 1/16/2008 11:28:27 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
If u want a good Van. Toyota Sienna 3.5 AWD (Fastest in Class) w/ HID & Laser cruise control and Full Leather. It just doesn't have the R's big opening roof.

reply to this comment
charlik05charlik05 - 1/17/2008 12:14:20 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
the only reason it was selling at all was because of huge rebates on it, up to $12,000. last year you could lease one for around $350 - $400 a month for 27 months!

reply to this comment
JUGNUJUGNU - 1/17/2008 4:39:43 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Some of MB's mistkes.

1)R Class
2)GLK
3)C Class's interior
4)Failure brand Maybach
5)Falure brand Smart

but good to see they are accepting one by one. before they accepted the Relibility problems, now that R class is not good enough and i am waiting for MB to accept that GLK and C Class's interior is ugly too.
And as a whole do something to bring the prices and displacement of their engines little down.

JUGNU

reply to this comment
w209w114w209w114 - 1/17/2008 4:35:40 PMView My AgentSpace
-2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
What do you have against Mercedes JUGNU? I always wonder your motives in why you always insist on bashing them. Youre calling the C-Class interior a mistake??? Have you ever sat in one? In Addition the GLK hasnt even been released YET and youre calling that a failure as well. On what premises?


w209w114w209w114 - 1/17/2008 4:37:17 PMView My AgentSpace
-2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Same thing goes for Smart. You ignore the fact that they have underestimated the demand for this vehicle just by looking at the numbers already reserved.


HorsehideHorsehide - 1/17/2008 5:07:09 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Has everyone overlooked the fact that this vehicle is basically a rebodied Chrysler Pacifica with a bigger engine? Same parents (DaimlerChrysler) but the older sibling is WAY more attractive (if you like this type of vehicle).

reply to this comment
RupertRupert - 1/17/2008 5:17:20 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It is in no way related to the Chrysler Pacifica.
The R class is built on the same platform as the Ml and GL Classes.


w209w114w209w114 - 1/17/2008 4:38:39 PMView My AgentSpace
-2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Rupert is right. It has nothing to do with Chrysler. Mercedes isnt like Lexus which are rebadged cheaper cars with leather and wood.


HorsehideHorsehide - 1/17/2008 5:41:09 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I stand corrected! ;)

reply to this comment
SteveSteve - 1/17/2008 5:49:39 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
re: "Zetsche blames the crossover segment, saying it hasn’t developed as planned."

The formula is pretty simple: People buy the cars they like and can afford. If you're not selling enough units, tne the vehicle is either priced too high compares to perceived value, or not enough consumers like it.

reply to this comment
huu76huu76 - 1/18/2008 12:33:47 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Just shows that Mercedes will always be smarter than BMW. MB knows how to admit mistakes. They even have the guts to say they're bencmarking Lexus for quality.

reply to this comment
DW1968DW1968 - 1/19/2008 3:06:02 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I never understood the target demographic for the R-class. Cutting through the marketing, it's basically a luxury mini-van. Is there really a market for this?

Families with kids who need a mini-van are not going to want to pay for a premium vehicle that the kids will tear up.

Families without kids (or with grown-up kids) don't usually travel in groups that often, so they're not going to pay for a premium mini-van; if anything, they'd get a luxury SUV.

So it always seemed like it was a solution looking for a problem, to me.

I don't think the sales issues are related to the cross-over segment or with MB quality.

reply to this comment
huu76huu76 - 1/19/2008 6:13:16 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think being related to the Chrysler Pacifica didn't help either. I know, MB is adamant they're not the same vehicle, but only a dummy would deny it.

reply to this comment
TybeeZ4TybeeZ4 - 1/19/2008 7:48:00 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Never could get excited about the R. But all you critics shouldn't forget that MB gave us the CLS which has generated clones from Porsche, Aston and more to come... truly defining a new car segment, the 4dr coupe.

reply to this comment
damikcodamikco - 1/20/2008 11:29:40 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The R class is only good for a certain few.

reply to this comment
To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Peugeot Builds 50 Millionth Peugeot CarBrazil receives a new Volkswagen Gol 2009 modelSeat reveals schedule until 2010, includes first ever Seat SUVBritish companies plan a new kinetic hybrid flywheel systemGordon Murrays T25 City Car SketchesInterior spy pictures of the next-generation BMW 5-seriesSpy pictures of the BMW X6 HybridNew Tatra concept revealed, the 903 concept modelOpel to feature the Insignia hatchback and sedan at the British Motor ShowThe Chevrolet Beat is being considered for the U.S marketBugatti wants a new model, maybe even a four-door-coupeToyota Canada Reduce Retail Prices on 11 ModelsMaybach Exelero Concept for sale for $7.8 millionDetails emerge on 2010 Toyota Prius, more power and better fuel-economy2009 Ford Focus RS images leaked before debutGM To Unleash Corvette S-Limited in JapanA Sneak Peek At Mercedes Benz's European SLR Code Name Z199Leaked Images Have Hit The Web But The Spies Are The First With Full Details Of The New 7-SeriesSTUD or DUD? The 2009 BMW 7 Series Leaks It Way On The WebMINI SUV to spawn a 5-door hatchbackThink June Sales Were Bad? Both GM and Toyota Say Their Sales Will Fall Even FurtherBMW 135i with carbon fiber partsMerrill says GM bankruptcy possibleAUTOEXPRESS UK: Jaguar XKR-S vs Audi R8 vs Nissan GT-RPorsche 997 TARGA Refresh Leaked Before LaunchAudi A5 3.2 Quattro ReviewToyota struggling to meet small car and hybrid demandNow Just What Would You Do For A Tank Of Gas?High Gas Prices Causing European Market DownturnThe Good The Bad And the Ugly - Who Will Rise And Who Will Fall In 2008?Video: New Lexus RX goes testing at Nurburgring2008 JE Design Audi Q7 Street Rocket2008 BMW Z0 Concept Design by Andrei Avarvarii2008 Lamberti LS1 ConceptThe New Kia Forte Sport Sedan2008 Volvo & DOE Expand Drivelines2008 Audi R8 DTM Safety CarB&B Tuned Audi TTS Sportcoupe With 362HPHyunda-Kia is the 5th largest automaker in the world, beats HondaFord to launch ECOnetic version of Fiesta with 67mpgLand Rover Lr3 Hse ReviewMeltdown of US car giantsElectric power for MercedesHot News: New Alfa 8CNext-gen Mercedes SLK 63 AMG TOYOTA TUNDRA 5.7-Liter V-8 Supercharger Rated at 504-HorsepowerKTM X-BOW It will hit you in the heart! First DriveNissan Sales Plummet 18.5% In June - Infiniti Slides 11.9%Bucking the Trend: Audi Sales Increase 5.3% For JuneToyota Tundra Sales Tanking - H.D. Tundra In Trouble?