|
| Search:
Submit An Article
Top News
Most Recent
Dealer Reviews
FREE Classifieds
Search Listings
Sell Your Car FREE
Auto Show Galleries
Villa D'Este
Bimmerfest
2009 Infiniti FX
2009 BMW X6
2009 Audi A4 Avant
New York Auto Show
2009 Mercedes SL-Series
Geneva Motor Show
Chicago Auto Show
Paris Cars
Detroit Auto Show
San Diego Auto Show
2007 New England Auto Show
2007 LA Auto Show
BMW Welt (World)
2007 SEMA Auto Show
2007 Frankfurt Auto Show
2007 The Quail
2007 Concorso Italiano
2007 Concours d Elegance
News By Category
Spy Shots
Spy News
New Cars
Misc News
Photo Galleries
Reviews
Report Cards
Videos
Polls
Rumors
Agent001
Multimedia is a ZERO billion dollar industry. Steve Jobs 1989.
View My AgentSpace
66
FACE OFF FRIDAY: What's Better Looking? Range Rover Sport Or BMW X6?
Agent001
submitted on 05/02/2008
Official Bell & Ross Timestamp
: 12:09 PM
from: www.autospies.com
[77] user comments
| category:
Report Cards
Print this Page
|
Digg It
|
del.icio.us
Tags: Range Rover Sport, BMW X6
Tag Links:
Range Rover Sport
,
BMW X6
FACE OFF FRIDAY: What's Better Looking? Range Rover Sport Or BMW X6?
It's always hard to tell exactly how a car looks just in photos.
You really need to see it in person, driving on the street and next to its key competitors before you can make a final judgement.
So this morning by chance, I parked the new X6 next to one of its new arch enemies, the Range Rover Sport to see how they compared.
The Range Rover Sport is one of if not the prettiest SUV's out there and on a side note, a vehicle that NO woman on earth doesn't want.
Take a look at the photos of the two side by side and YOU make the call...
What's the better looking ride?
Range Rover Sport or has BMW stolen the crown?
And don't forget to keep checking our
2008 Bimmerfest gallery
often for updates.
Here are a couple good links to the show if you're thinking of attending:
2008 Bimmerfest Facebook Page
Official Bimmerfest.com event site
Maybe we'll see you all there!
And don't forget to wash your car this weekend! ;)
Comments:
Images hosted in your
AgentSpace
can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]
w209w114
- 5/2/2008 12:20:00 PM
View My AgentSpace
+5 Boost
PFTT!! Please... The Range Rover Hands down.
reply to this comment
M35MT
- 5/2/2008 12:38:11 PM
View My AgentSpace
+3 Boost
RRS no contest.
Dr550
- 5/2/2008 1:33:25 PM
+3 Boost
I thought BMW evolutioned this design theme when they owned Range Rover. Even used BMW 4.4L engine for awhile. It does look "timeless."
M35MT
- 5/2/2008 4:06:16 PM
View My AgentSpace
+2 Boost
You're thinking of the big daddy RR.
jeffy210
- 5/2/2008 12:21:09 PM
-4 Boost
PFFT!! Please... The X6 Hands down.
reply to this comment
w209w114
- 5/2/2008 3:13:07 PM
View My AgentSpace
+1 Boost
Nice try
BMW4me4ever
- 5/2/2008 12:21:39 PM
View My AgentSpace
+2 Boost
At our location we sell both the Range Rover and BMW X6. The Range Rover to me, looks dated in the pictures. Again, those that have not seen the X6, go to your local dealer and take a look at it. It is larger and has a much greater presence in Real life vs in pictures.
X6 all the way
reply to this comment
0to60
- 5/2/2008 9:28:04 PM
+4 Boost
you have to see the X6 in person. Pics do no justice!
EL34
- 5/2/2008 12:22:55 PM
-1 Boost
I like the X6, but I like the Range Rover too.
I'll take whichever comes with the babes :-D
reply to this comment
Agent001
- 5/2/2008 12:27:31 PM
View My AgentSpace
+1 Boost
BOTH!
001
CommonSense01
- 5/2/2008 12:27:54 PM
+7 Boost
Its very hard to compete with Range Rovers design. Although the X6 is more flashy and will look cooler for the first year, the Range Rover will never age. I see a 1994 Range Rover 4.6 HSE and they still look good, timeless design will do that.
reply to this comment
M35MT
- 5/2/2008 12:39:05 PM
View My AgentSpace
+5 Boost
Exactly, the timeless design is what makes it so special.
enthusiastx11
- 5/2/2008 1:12:51 PM
+2 Boost
you're talking about the real range rover. and i agree.
but this little sport thing is sad.
CommonSense01
- 5/2/2008 1:34:18 PM
+1 Boost
enthusiastx11
Yes you are correct, i was reffering to the RR and not the RR sport, didnt even notice in the pictures. Although i think the RR sport looks decent too,but its looks and name write a check that the engine and chassie just cant cash.
vman1013
- 5/2/2008 9:38:01 PM
+1 Boost
the sport never had the same presence as as the "REAL" RR. And sadly enough, the sport has a shitty interior - even compared to a dated BMW interior. Performance wise, the V8 X6 should own even the Super Charged Sport.
but it all depends on whose little brother you want to take out to play!
Monk
- 5/2/2008 12:35:38 PM
View My AgentSpace
+3 Boost
range rover - classy, traditional, tank-ish but brilliant
x6 - sporty, chunky, but not so impressive
reply to this comment
DexDiamonds
- 5/2/2008 12:38:58 PM
+4 Boost
It is a timeless design. But I like how BMW shook things up with the X6. Kinda got bored with the box look.
reply to this comment
CommonSense01
- 5/2/2008 1:36:32 PM
+1 Boost
I might be wrong but im pretty sure the FX was the first to step outside the box-desgin box.
KZ258
- 5/2/2008 12:43:59 PM
+4 Boost
Range Rover Sport
reply to this comment
BJS470
- 5/2/2008 12:50:34 PM
+4 Boost
Range Rover
reply to this comment
auto001
- 5/2/2008 12:55:29 PM
0 Boost
Simple really, if you want a true offroad vehicle (locking diffs, low rage gearbox) that looks just as good doing it, buy Range Rover. If you've sold your soul to the devil and BMW marketing machine has already clouded your judgment into buying a pointless/non-practical vehicle that doesn't work offroad, you buy the X6.
reply to this comment
BMW4me4ever
- 5/2/2008 1:30:57 PM
View My AgentSpace
+2 Boost
yeah and the last time I went offroad in a $70k vehicle to use it what it is for, was never. How many people actually use their SUV's for they where intended for anyways? 90% of the people that buy the Range Rover, never go near anything off road. The closest they come is their driveway, which technically is off of the road .
Maverick2020
- 5/2/2008 12:56:32 PM
+3 Boost
Range Rover Sport. But I would want the X6 mechanicals and build quality.
reply to this comment
enthusiastx11
- 5/2/2008 1:06:09 PM
-2 Boost
X6 without a doubt!
the range rover sport is trying to be its big brother, and it fails. it's a poseur car for someone who can't afford the most beautiful SUV in the world: THE range rover.
reply to this comment
enthusiastx11
- 5/2/2008 1:13:53 PM
0 Boost
but this question is rather pointless, because 80%+ of people on here haven't even SEEN the X6.
reply to this comment
opfreak
- 5/2/2008 1:22:05 PM
+3 Boost
RR
and BTW, most real women dont care about cars.
reply to this comment
answer
- 5/2/2008 1:22:58 PM
+2 Boost
Rover by a wide margin.
reply to this comment
Audiphile
- 5/2/2008 1:25:02 PM
+2 Boost
The BMW X6 certainly looks sleeker, but the Range Rover Sport has more rear-seat headroom, more cargo space, and is much more capable offroad than the X6. If I need a SUV (and I don't), the Range Rover Sport wins this comparison easily.
reply to this comment
BMW4me4ever
- 5/2/2008 1:28:03 PM
View My AgentSpace
0 Boost
when are you going to go off-road? Actually, the X6 is as big in the rear seat as the Range Rover Sport. You would be surprised if and when you see it in person. Plus the Performance of the Range Rover Sport is nowhere near the X6. The X6 embarasses the Range Rover Sport.
kthor
- 5/3/2008 12:15:04 AM
+2 Boost
The X6 looks like a sports car next to the very square Rover. The X6 will blow the doors off it on-road.
X6
Caraficionado
- 5/2/2008 1:30:35 PM
+3 Boost
Two different cars. The RR will age more nicely though.
reply to this comment
speedmaster
- 5/2/2008 1:33:47 PM
View My AgentSpace
+3 Boost
Comments from a RRS owner.
That is the same color as my RRS but I have the black interior. Thanks for posting these pictures. I didn't realize the X6 was that big. Judging from the rear, it doesn't look so bad anymore when I realize the size porportions.
I still prefer my RRS for several reasons -- towing, offroad capabilities. These are 2 things the X6 lacks. I am sure the X6 is a faster, more docile and agile machine but I don't need that in a SUV. If I wanted that, I'd get a M5 or a Porsche 997. I tow with my RRS twice a month so I can't give that up.
The X6 will probably be very popular this year because it is the latest, new kid on the block. However, in 2 years, the RRS will get the 5.0 engine with 500 hp and I've seen the new Jaguar XF interior on the RRS in spy photos. By that time, I'll upgrade.
As for my opinion, I still pick a RRS again today. 2 years of ownership and ZERO problems. 10 year of LR ownership and zero problems.
reply to this comment
CommonSense01
- 5/2/2008 1:38:52 PM
+1 Boost
Im not trying to be sarcastic, seriuos question for a seriuos owner such as yourself. If you dont need any of the things you mentioned, then why did you purchase a Supercharged version of the RR?
Matthew1
- 5/2/2008 5:43:42 PM
+4 Boost
Uh...'RRS' -Range Rover Sport.
CommonSense01
- 5/4/2008 6:28:08 PM
+1 Boost
Mathew
Thanks, i thught it said Range rover sport supercharged, my mistake. But the question still stands, if performance doesnt matter then why by the slowest truck in the world with the Sport name it, why not an LR3?
S4cabriofoxone
- 5/4/2008 11:38:06 PM
View My AgentSpace
0 Boost
Well, why NOT get a Supercharged if you can? He may not buy for the performance, but it probably offers better towing capability, not to mention the extra grunt is always nice to have. The X6 only offers performance; the RRS-S has both, albeit much less performance than the BMW.
AdmiralT20
- 5/2/2008 1:34:56 PM
+2 Boost
The X6 for me, certainly the better looking one
reply to this comment
Batman219
- 5/2/2008 1:43:12 PM
+1 Boost
Rover.
reply to this comment
speedmaster
- 5/2/2008 1:45:18 PM
View My AgentSpace
+1 Boost
CommonSense01.
I didn't get the SC version. I have the HSE because I needed the smaller wheels and locking rear heavy duty differentials.
20" stormer wheels and Brembo brakes won't cut it in offroad situations. If you notice, all the RRS used for offroading
uses smaller 18" LR3 wheels. Heck, I'm ashame to say that Land Rover, Porsche and all these manufactures give you crappy performance summer tires that are useless in the snow or beach.
When you get stuck in at the beach, the kid in the Audi A4 or WRX will be clowing your ass.
Again, I don't need 0-60 in 6 or 7 seconds for a SUV.
reply to this comment
vladyxa
- 5/2/2008 1:57:04 PM
+1 Boost
Which babe's name is Range Rover, blond or brunette?
reply to this comment
lasikdoc
- 5/2/2008 1:57:08 PM
+1 Boost
The RRS. The X6 lines just don't make sense to me.
reply to this comment
jt716
- 5/2/2008 1:58:27 PM
View My AgentSpace
+2 Boost
For here in SXM the RRS for sureee they are selling crazy here! X6 is for the concrete jungle!! I'm starting to like the x6's rear for some reason
reply to this comment
evilm
- 5/2/2008 2:34:35 PM
-1 Boost
I'll take an Aztec !
reply to this comment
evilm
- 5/2/2008 2:41:33 PM
-3 Boost
I'd like to giver her a present. A pearl necklace.
reply to this comment
amazinBimmer
- 5/2/2008 3:19:08 PM
-3 Boost
X6... all day.. its a BMW after all... always looks better
reply to this comment
SteveL
- 5/2/2008 3:20:42 PM
-1 Boost
The BMW but if I where to buy a auto costing that much I would not by either one of these.
reply to this comment
Porschinator
- 5/2/2008 3:27:22 PM
+4 Boost
RR has my vote. Though it is starting to get long in tooth but timeless styling holds up well. the X6 is def unique and most likely has better on-road performance, but RR comes back with off-road excellence.
reply to this comment
Carboy
- 5/2/2008 3:38:48 PM
View My AgentSpace
+4 Boost
I think they are almost equal in style. It's more if you prefer an elegant coupe styling or a "Get out of the way and glance" styling.
reply to this comment
lexusis350
- 5/2/2008 3:49:34 PM
+3 Boost
I like the X6 the best. If it was the regular Range Rover, I'd choose that one over the X6.
reply to this comment
M35er
- 5/2/2008 4:52:40 PM
-1 Boost
two ends of the spectrum - RR beautiful, Aztek, ahem, I mean X6 fugly. X6 will drive worlds better though.
reply to this comment
Vendetta
- 5/2/2008 5:14:35 PM
0 Boost
RRS all day long.
The X6 is a reincarnation of the Pontiac Aztek and mental retards like EL34 will be driving them.
Just another reason not to like the ugly X6.
reply to this comment
sizquik
- 5/2/2008 5:15:38 PM
+2 Boost
RR Sport Looks better - the X6 is better.
reply to this comment
KEVINBSL500
- 5/2/2008 6:50:29 PM
+2 Boost
I think the BMW looks better.
reply to this comment
Htay7500
- 5/2/2008 7:02:37 PM
-2 Boost
RRS
reply to this comment
mikeydred20
- 5/2/2008 7:19:37 PM
-2 Boost
I'm sorry but the X6 is fing ugly and pointless.
reply to this comment
Rupert
- 5/2/2008 7:22:22 PM
View My AgentSpace
0 Boost
RRS, even though it's an overweight slob of a sport SUV.
reply to this comment
bconca
- 5/2/2008 7:23:40 PM
+2 Boost
I driven the X6 3.5 and I shake my head. What a totally unnecessary, perhaps ridiculous, vehicle, but how unbelievably delecious to drive! Regarding looks, it's way better than I expected and better than the more dated RRS (which is really a LR3 Sport). I can't help but think a 335XiT (when will that come to USA?)or X5 make more sense, but then that X6 is something else to drive.
reply to this comment
koobah
- 5/2/2008 8:23:41 PM
+1 Boost
Weird comparison. Two totally different vehicles.
reply to this comment
bmwfan1513
- 5/2/2008 8:28:41 PM
+1 Boost
Not even a good comparison, the BMW is so much better!!!
reply to this comment
weaponX
- 5/2/2008 9:14:44 PM
+1 Boost
The RR Sport in traditional terms is more pretty, but the X6 has its own appeal. Its got a certain modern funky-ness to it that announces to the world you're driving the cutting edge.
This is like comparing Brooks Brothers to Versace.
reply to this comment
delan
- 5/2/2008 11:45:56 PM
-2 Boost
I think the X6 looks absolutely shiteous. Aiming at the RRSport..?? missed the target.
reply to this comment
aussiecarnut
- 5/3/2008 1:20:35 AM
-2 Boost
im not sure if this has been already said but they are not competitors.
RR sport competes with X5
RR Vogue etc competes with X6
and in both categories i believe RR wins. the RR has class, charisma and doesnt need to do anything radical design-wise
reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxone
- 5/5/2008 7:30:43 PM
View My AgentSpace
+1 Boost
Actually, the X6 XDrive 3.5 starts at $53K, which is similar to the RR Sport HSE's $57K starting point. They have the same power output, I believe. That's in US prices, though; might be different where you live.
S4cabriofoxone
- 5/5/2008 7:31:27 PM
View My AgentSpace
+1 Boost
BTW, neither of them compete with the "real" Range Rover. In a sense the X5 and X6 are both direct competitors to the RRS.
hao420
- 5/3/2008 2:04:12 AM
-1 Boost
Should be FX....
reply to this comment
farabira1
- 5/3/2008 4:55:17 AM
-3 Boost
Are you for serious, comparing the absurd monstrosity that is the X6 with probably the classiest sports SUV in the market is like asking for trouble. The Range Rover Sport is a hot piece of metal, it looks proud and tough, the silhouette is a transformation of the timeless Range Rover shape which has carried Kings and Queen, and mafias, and the illegal presidents of Africa. All the bada** people drive a Range Rover. It is the ride of footballers, David Beckham has got one. Certainly the most posh SUV in the planet, the most handsome, and the most brute looking at the same time, the design of the Range Rover Sport is aggressive and seriously cutting edge sharp, and the whole car is made of huge hunks of metal unlike the plastic body panels of the X6. The Range Rover sport is solid and really gives you a sense of momentum when the speed picks up, comparably the BMWs feel like skinny metal that is running light of the manly crudeness of the Range Rover sport. The X6 looks like a whale, big head and small tail, really looks like a fish or a frog. Very ugly stature and stance indeed. A very unnatural shape that evokes no sense of beauty and i can vomit for all i care about this design of the X6. My words are crude, and crass, but for such mutilated shape, i have only such words. It is disgusting the X6.
reply to this comment
M53R
- 5/3/2008 5:35:17 AM
View My AgentSpace
0 Boost
It might be because of the colour... but the X6 looks 10 times better (more modern). The Range even looks old!
reply to this comment
bmwfan999
- 5/3/2008 7:14:36 AM
0 Boost
Range Rover Sport, but not by too much. The X6 is aerodynamic, and I like it more than the X5, ML & Q7 (yes, I know the X5, ML & Q7 aren't the X6's competitors), but I think the RR Sport is one of the best SUV's around today. It isn't too full on, like the Range Rover Vogue, but it doesn't drop everything off; it still keeps the good bits from the RR Vogue.
reply to this comment
wac77
- 5/3/2008 10:34:10 AM
+1 Boost
On looks alone, the Range Rover Sport. And the RRS is a better off-roader. But I am sure the X6 drives/handles much better (on-road). Also RR quality/reliability is much worse than BMW's.
reply to this comment
Milton
- 5/3/2008 12:39:44 PM
+2 Boost
I can't believe people who say RRS looks better.
I know it's a matter of taste but....C'mon
reply to this comment
rayan333
- 5/4/2008 8:28:03 AM
0 Boost
PPL....First of all...BMW announced that there one and only competitor is the Infiniti FX45 (the upcoming FX50) soo u cant compare...second of all...the on going design that ppl are talking about...its nonsense...its just that RR ppl were out of ideas and wanted to make more money and change the design...its just like the 1996 model...just a new shape....The X6 has a bigger engine...U can compare the X5 with the RR but not the X6 its in a whole different place...i can just keep on talking forever...
reply to this comment
ubercool
- 5/4/2008 10:22:10 AM
-5 Boost
Range Rover is easily the best, BMW looks sad and fat!
reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxone
- 5/5/2008 7:29:07 PM
View My AgentSpace
+3 Boost
Sad? It looks a little angry to me.
MunichRob
- 5/4/2008 10:52:56 AM
View My AgentSpace
+2 Boost
They both look very good...
reply to this comment
TominNH
- 5/4/2008 2:06:45 PM
+1 Boost
I STILL think the X6 is the funniest looking thing sicen AMC was building their 4WD crap from the late 70s....Cant you just see Wayne and Garth singing their updated version of Bohemian Rhapsody?? LOLOL
reply to this comment
xj13
- 5/5/2008 12:31:20 AM
0 Boost
Range Rover S, the thing is I havent seen the X6 in the flesh, until then its a RRS.
reply to this comment
993Turbo
- 5/5/2008 9:30:52 AM
0 Boost
I'll take the Cayenne GTS!
reply to this comment
To post a comment for this story, you must first
Login
.
If you do not have an account, you will need to
Register
(It's Free!).
Most Recent Stories
2008 MASERATI GRAN TURISMO
Do You Buy A Brand Based Off Study Numbers, Reputation, Or Something Else?
No Audi Q5 hybrid, Q7 hybrid coming next year
Audi and Cadillac most improved in luxury brand perception survey
BMW and Audi To Follow Lexus' Lead In 8 Speed Transmissions
The SMART Is Cute But Will Have Lasting Power?
2009 Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 - Exclusive First Test
Toyota Puts Latest U.S. Plant On Hold
Toyota Loses Hybrid Patent Infringement Appeal
Edmunds Insideline: Jaguar XF Supercharged easily defeats 550i, A6, and E550
Toyota considering a Prius-badged family
Kia to bring Soul to U.S. in 2009
VW teams up with Sanyo to produce lithium-ion batteries
Audi and Caddy top Kelley Blue Book luxury brand study
First ever built Lamborghini Reventon arrives in Las Vegas
GM customers left high and dry by strikes
Saturn could get a micro minivan for North American market
Peugeot 4007 SE by Irmscher
BMW developing new eco 3-series
Which Is The MOTHER Of Under $50k Premium Coupes?
SUNDAY SOUNDOFF - What if Gas Hits $7.00 a Gallon???
2009 CTS- V Blisters Nurburgring
Spied: 2009 Opel/Vauxhall Insignia