68 Votes

First Drive: Nissan GT-R Hits The Road!

Agent009 submitted on 11/30/2007 Official Bell & Ross Timestamp: 10:18:39 AM

124 user comments | Category: Report Cards | Source: | SOURCE: www.autoexpress.co.uk

Has it really been six years? Way back in 2001, Auto Express published the world’s first pictures of the Nissan GT-R concept.

Since then, we have seen the spy shots, watched the launch and digested the specification of Japan’s mightiest-ever supercar.

And with good reason, too. With 473bhp, Nissan’s new GT-R is the most potent production car the nation has ever built. It has nearly 200bhp more than its predecessor, and its specification is mouth-watering: twin-turbo V6, double-clutch gearbox, advanced four-wheel drive, adjustable dampers, gearshift and traction control, plus construction that features both aluminium and carbon fibre.

So advanced is the engine, Nissan builds it in laboratory conditions in a clean room at the centre of its sprawling Yokohama factory. This all sounds very impressive, but how does the GT-R shape up in reality?

Read Article

About the Author

"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."
— Agent009 (View Profile)

User Comments

This car does nothing for me and I will never consider buying one.

I need a car with styling and this car lacks it.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:39:39 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -21

I think it has pretty distinctive styling. But still not my cup of tea though.
— Agent009 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:43:01 AM | | Votes: 0

What would you call the styling?

Because I have no idea what to make of it.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:39:13 AM | | Votes: -19

but the corvette styling is consistent throughout, this seems to be an eclipse's schnozz grafted to a mustang's rump.

deadly fast, but a stylistic failure.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:48:40 PM | | Votes: -2

To be honest with you the GT-R looks like some kind of a stinkin' fish to me.

:(

Now is it a fresh water or a sea-going fish???
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:26:54 PM | | Votes: -17

This car does nothing for me either except that I like the styling. I'm just not into sports cars any more. I like reasonably powered 4-door sedans and diesels with long range between fill-ups and my wife is into small SUVs (waiting to see the coming Tiguan).
— EnnNorak (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:33:03 PM | | Votes: -1

If EL34 doesn't like it, you know it must be good!

— answer (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 4:12:42 PM | | Votes: 12

Old News To Me.
— pacotacolol (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:11:28 PM | | Votes: -2

COME ON guys! Give EL34 a break he is mentally retarded!
— SVXXX (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:28:27 PM | | Votes: 8

I was never a fan of the styling of this car, and to be honest with you, I was never on the band wagon either. I always felt that if I was going to spend that kind of money I would get a Vette or Porsche. But, after seeing it at the LA auto show, it started to covertly change me. This car is not photogenic, it actually doesn't look that bad in person, and I would consider test driving this car because I think that compared to a Z06 or 911, it comes down to driver preference. Does that mean that I'll buy one, No. But, I'll give it a chance to win me over.
— KillBot (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 6:59:48 PM | | Votes: 1

Toughy, this Nissan doesn't look anywhere as kool as the Mercedes R-Klasse.

In fact, the GT-R should be called the Fish-Class.

Like a cold - dead - stiff - fish :)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 7:32:50 PM | | Votes: -11

KillBot, wait till you see the GT-R on the road a few times, it will look like a common household Nissan Sentra because of that outlandish outdated stale styling ;)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 7:35:33 PM | | Votes: -8

bleek, I would never in a million years compare the GT-R's styling with the hightech look of the BMW 1-Series :)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 7:37:17 PM | | Votes: -7

Everyone knows nothing compare to your A-hole mark in front.
— qweasdzxc (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:04:02 PM | | Votes: 3

Its nice, but like everyone says, its a little too ugly for me.
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:49:43 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -3

"its a little too ugly for me"

That implies that there is an acceptable level of ugly for you, eh :)
— Agent008 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:55:58 AM | | Votes: 5

something like that... I could live with some ugliness, if the package was just right. hehe.
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:00:26 PM | | Votes: 2

why would anyone deboost me for my opinion? not like I am stating it as fact. not that it matters? just wondering.
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:39:10 PM | | Votes: 0

I don't think this is "too ugly" for you. If you could live with an "acceptable" amount of ugliness, you could live with this car, which makes up for any design lapse with its 0-60mph in 3.5 seconds. AND you could buy an Infiniti G35 and a Mazdaspeed3 (both for practical reasons) with the money you saved not buying a Porsche 911 Turbo.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:11:44 AM | | Votes: 2

that is true. I think that although I do not think its the most attractive car, if I were to get one, I could live with its looks, based on its performance alone. However, the statement abou the turbo and the GTR, I would indeed spend more for a porsche than get the GTR.

I have a 911, and if I had to do it again, I would get my Porsche over this car. Thats just my love with Porsche...
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/3/2007 4:47:04 PM | | Votes: 2

This is a TEST Comment
Salman Khan
<a href=http://www.google.com/>Salman Khan</a>
http://www.google.com/
— salman22 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:57:08 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

clearly a great performance car on the track. kudos to nissan.

but harsh ride makes it impractical for normal roads on a regular basis.

and it still looks like an economy car. it's not elegant or refined looking like a 911 or anything italian. looks like the front end of an old prelude mated with the body shape of a 10-year old mitsubishi 3000GT.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:11:12 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2

"enthusiastx11" I don't know how anyone can argue with what you just said, well mabye the economy car part but other than that I thought everything else you said was obvious.

Sure the GT-R looks cool & sporty, so does the 350Z, you may even prefer that to the ‘swoopy’ design of the Porsche, but as elegant or refined looking as a Porsche? Come on guys you can't be serious.
— MunichRob (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:09:30 PM | | Votes: 2

The 911 is still the most beautifully simple automotive form on the road.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:12:33 AM | | Votes: 2

To me it's just perfection. I completely like it's styling and everything.

JUGNU
— JUGNU (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:18:15 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 8

Agreed. LOVE the rear end.
— Hantra (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:24:47 AM | | Votes: 9

well, you're in the minority.

at least nissan hasn't set unrealistic sales goals...only 1500 coming to the US per year.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:25:56 AM | | Votes: -4

if they made 5000 it would sell regardless...the GTR is/has been a beast for enthusiasts/tuners. that alone would guarantee plenty of sales...

it just goes to show that, again, if it isnt out of Germany, many here downplay it. the GTR is a stunning design and is even more impressive in white
— r15mohd (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:38:39 AM | | Votes: 6

"if they made 5000 it would sell regardless."

remind me...is nissan a charity or a for-profit concern? if they were confident about demand, they'd make them. only an idiot businessperson leaves money on the table.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:03:26 PM | | Votes: -7

I could be wrong, but not many tuners/enthusiasts spend 70k on a vehicle. While I know there are lots who will, most would probably wait until this hits the used car market in about 3-4 years before buying it as a discount price, because the performance will not be lacking.

As for "downplay it", thats a matter of opinion, and theres nothing wrong with liking designs from certain brands over others.

While I agree that most people are blind fanboys who will swear a car the shape of a fire extinguisher looks great, I for one will be bias on some occasions, but this car really doesnt drive the emotional appeals out of me.
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:09:31 PM | | Votes: 3

Jugnu, "Perfection"? This is a Nissan, not a Lexus.

*Devil Smiley*
— Bill (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:10:50 PM | | Votes: -4

"remind me...is nissan a charity or a for-profit concern? if they were confident about demand, they'd make them."

enthusiastx, I'm sorry, but how many BMW M6s do you think are sold here? Slated to be sold here?

It's a simple business principle called supply-and-demand. If Nissan keeps supply down, demand will remain up. They can charge higher prices. The owners can enjoy some semblance of "exclusivity." And everyone's happy. I think you know that a car with these numbers, for $70K, has the potential to sell a LOT more than 1500 units a year.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:16:03 AM | | Votes: 3

I just love this car. And I'm not expecting Porsche quality levels here. Its price doesn't warrant that if you consider that it can keep up with the best runners costing a whole lot more... and even blow right past a few others. But for their asking price and knowing the technology that went into creating this car, its perfection enough imo.
— PlanB (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:34:03 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

Notice how everybody is copying Audi with big grills.. the GT-R has it, the EVO X and some Toyota's too.
— SevorbeupstryIsBack (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:08:13 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -6

SevorbeupstryIsBack,

Didn't the GT-R concept in 2001 already have this big-grill feature? Does Audi's grill pre-date that?

Not making any claims. Just asking.
— Ingenieur (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:40:42 PM | | Votes: 2

It's not that everyone is copying big grilles -- it's that the auto industry is taking the same direction in unison. Currently it's big grilles and tomorrow they will conspire to change styling direction toward smaller grilles just to make idiot consumers want to go out and buy a new car. All men should be men and ignore trends pushed by stylists whose work requires Freudian analysis -- women will always be style conscious and fall for gimmicks designed to get them to buy new clothes and stuff as often as possible.
— EnnNorak (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:48:23 PM | | Votes: 3

No. The R34 Skyline GT-R looked like this:

http://www.fantasycars.com/derek/cars/images/nissan/gtr_1.jpg

It had a two-piece grille, more similar to Audis of the late 1990s.

In fact, the new GT-R really doesn't have "big grille." It's just that the strip of bodywork in between the top and bottom intakes is painted black, which makes it look like one grille but actually isn't.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:18:49 AM | | Votes: 2

The rear 3/4 shot with the mountains in the background...and in white...simply gorgeous. This car rocks. Haters dont deserve to drive it.
— M35MT (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:23:16 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

@SevorbeupstryIsBack

The GTR concept from 2001 had a big single frame grill thats a long time before audi came with it.
— STJ88 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 12:36:01 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

Looks gorgeous in white. Nice job, Nissan.
— Bill (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:09:47 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Grille copied from Audi....hahaha.

Audi themselves started putting it only 4 to 5 years back and same with LED stripes in the bumper.

it's a new signature and hold no value compare to like MB's or BMW's twin kidney grille which is there for years.

so anyone can put the big grille and LED lights. IT'S NOT AN AUDI SIGNATURE.

JUGNU
— JUGNU (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:11:13 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2

Yes, it is, because like you said it started four years ago and it is on EVERY MODEL. Just because it's new doesn't mean it's not a distinct feature.

This and the new EVO X both have "Audi grilles." That's hard to deny.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:13:34 AM | | Votes: 2

I have to say that when I heard they were bringing this car to the U.S. that I was not to sure about it, but wow, this car looks awesome and will be able to destroy anything on the road.
— PerformanceGuy (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:19:16 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

It sounds like a very impressive car. However, I'll wait until I have a chance to drive it before I pass judgement.

Just like some people, there are some attractive vehicles that are not photogenic, i.e. they look fine "in the flesh" but don't look so hot in a photo. For Nissan's sake, I hope the GT-R is one of those vehicles.
— Audiphile (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:32:59 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

Good take i'm with you> i want to see the machine in person i must say it looks very different in white then silver for some strange reason.
Like you said in the flesh can be a whole new ball game kinda like actors, most look good on the screen look awful in person, i hope this is the reverse for this car?
— chuck717 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:51:40 PM | | Votes: 5

Cars are like women -- you have to judge them by performance not looks, otherwise you may get stuck with a bitch of a car that only sucks your wallet dry.
— EnnNorak (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:52:30 PM | | Votes: 0

The Mercedes-Benz S and CL-Class (W221 models) looked terrible in press shots but they look absolutely stunning on the road. I think this is one of those cars. It may not be a beautiful shape, but it will have presence.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:20:42 AM | | Votes: 1

well unlike AMG who claims that a master tech hand builds each engine, the GTR engine really is built and assembled by hand ala honda type r hand polished bores and all. this is why they can only make so many a month and i doubt very much it has anything to do with nissan's "confidence" that this car will sell. this isnt some limited 2 year run, this is how all GTRs will come. one day...
— gsh23 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 1:45:45 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

AMG engines are built by hand. What makes you claim that it's all BS?

Fanboy.
— Bill (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:56:23 PM | | Votes: 1

AMG engines are all handbuilt.

Look it up on UTube ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XMlLgl79ek
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 7:41:13 PM | | Votes: 1

CAR magazine review:

"Quite simply, the new GT-R is the world’s most multi-faceted supercar. There is no fast car so easy to steer, none so forgiving, no car that has more armoury in its quest to go fast and keep you out of trouble.

Just as that old GT-R resets the standards for front-engined coupés, so the new one lifts the bar ever higher. An M3 beater? Easily. M5? Think higher. This car is faster, more high-tech, sharper, more capable. Faster than a 911 Turbo on the straight. Or on the circuit. And all for normal 911 money. Genius. "

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/first_drive.php?sid=1305&page=1

— Ingenieur (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:09:18 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

That's what you should've said the first time around. It's the point of my post.
— Ingenieur (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 3:36:54 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

i get car and driver in the mail, and they did say it was an excellent car, but cars today are all preference, thats why we have stupid fanboys who will tell you that THEIR favorite car is the best and no other car is even close to it. The new gt-r isnt the best lookin, but it is fast, but its a hate it or love it car. Personally im a fan of the viper, have been since it came out, that why i love the new one because its fast, and no its not the prettiest, but it has attitude, and i would take one over any car out there. When it comes to skylines, personally i love the r33 style, so if i were to get a skyline, id take the new one, with the style of the r33.
— McFlu (View Profile)

Posted on 12/21/2007 12:50:02 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Every body likes the frog a mean (Porsche 911) same Sh!@#$% diferent year. Y do not like the new GTR style but at least is different. Again remember that Beauty is in eye of the beholder.
— Yonder7 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:07:13 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

I prefer the styling of the GT-R over the 911. Its different, and its proportions look right for the history of GT-Rs.

Porsche should come up with something new, hopefully within the next 20 years. Theres just something admirable about trying something new, and porsche just seems too Conservative.
— Obliv (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:46:02 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

took the words right out of my mouth. I love porsches as well, but in black, the GTR is just right.
— Htay7500 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:49:43 PM | | Votes: 3

I still want a Porsche...
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 10:15:26 PM | | Votes: 1

You may call the porsche "a classic beauty", but ill still call it lazy. At least the GTR is going out on a branch with something new.
— Obliv (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2007 6:30:05 PM | | Votes: 1

CAR magazine review:

"Quite simply, the new GT-R is the world’s most multi-faceted supercar. There is no fast car so easy to steer, none so forgiving, no car that has more armoury in its quest to go fast and keep you out of trouble.

Just as that old GT-R resets the standards for front-engined coupés, so the new one lifts the bar ever higher. An M3 beater? Easily. M5? Think higher. This car is faster, more high-tech, sharper, more capable. Faster than a 911 Turbo on the straight. Or on the circuit. And all for normal 911 money. Genius. "

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/first_drive.php?sid=1305&page=1

— Ingenieur (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:49:29 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

NICE! Let's see all the stupid German car fanboys come out now from the woodwork and act like douches while trying to defend their overweight, overpriced piles of garbage.

M3, M5...what a joke...they stick huge engines in 3500LB+ cars and think they did a good job. You know what they say...shit attracts flys.
— nozferatu (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 4:03:48 PM | | Votes: 2

Thanks for the link Ingenieur, that's valid review. This car is great, I had a chance to see it at the LA auto show and its lines are elegant and simply beautiful, no need to mention its performance.
— GTR35 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 6:12:13 PM | | Votes: 1

Let's face it, Nissan is dumping this car on America with a reduced price.

It's not the first time ;)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 4:02:40 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -4

Like any 1st iteration car you should never jump on the first model. This car will be sure to have its faults and bugs. May be best to wait for the second go round. And before anyone jumps on my comment and start saying that this is not the 1st iteration because it picks up where the last car left off...let me end it by saying you're an idiot and get over it!
— Need4Speed (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 4:59:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

So when do we see the stock production models numbers?
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:10:27 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -6

The review is just okay. For a GT with such massive tourqe I was expecting more from it. The article is right on in regards to Porsche "the twin-turbo flat-six is a masterpiece".
— BM3W (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:21:59 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

So being faster than an M3 or matching the 911 is not enough for you? I think you're simply hurt, why dont you take a look at this review and wipe your tears:
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/first_drive.php?sid=1305&page=1
— GTR35 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 6:21:40 PM | | Votes: -1

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/first_drive.php?sid=1305&page=1

Read it mate.

0-62mph or {0-100kmph for you yanks} takes 3.6 secs

Does that not totally destroy your High & Mighty claim that the Reviews will prove this "Nissan Claim" as false ?

— I95SPEEDINGTICKETS (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 12:12:00 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

I'm not a fan of this vehicle genre, I want a more "everyday" car, and this, with its "transmission shunt", "harsher ride than an M3 or 911 turbo" and not-great interior, doesn't really do it for me. I know it's fast, I know it handles great, but I want a more complete package.
And just think, you're at a party "What car do you drive?"
"A Nissan"
"Oh"
"But it's a really faster super cool one..."
*Walks away from car bore*
— Rupert (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 6:10:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

That says it all.

You would purchase a G8 over a G37, I now understand why you have such low expectations from vehicles.

I dont like the G37 but will never pick the G8 over it.
— I95SPEEDINGTICKETS (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 12:16:44 PM | | Votes: 1

bunch of jackass posts for the most part coming from close-minded EL34... i would give any car a chance, except the new mustangs..unless its a roush..the best handling of all..anyway, this car looks beautiful in pictures, and im sure it looks stunning in real life...even if nissan didnt accomplish all their 'hype' with not-60 times, they DID accomplish making a beautiful,fast, vehicle, congrats to them, and cant wait to see it on the streets in real life!
— BMWfan_Alfredo (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 7:15:35 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

Beautiful is a Ferrari.

This car looks about as good as a Datsun 300ZX with some bathtub mixed in.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 8:39:04 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

I really like the interior of this. If Nissan/Infiniti would use the same interior parts and the same styling as the GT-R, they would be some real competition.
— lexusis350 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 8:59:32 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

For once, I agree with bleek. The interior is a strange mix of design elements and it looks cheap and very '90s. The exterior is amazing.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:01:53 PM | | Votes: 1

This Nissan GT-R officially time on the famous German track at 7:38s and 0-60s in 3.5s. That all it matter for now, and it can out run many supercars.

Just wait until the Lighter V-spec Nissan GT-R come out. It will probably run the track in 7:20 range and do 0-60 in 3s flat.

Don't worry this is Godzilla we are talking about, it will be back with Vegenence for sure!
— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:10:38 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

"Lexus" a lighter V-Spec GT-R isn't even confirmed, but say if they do end up releasing one, I assure you it won't likely improve it's time around the ring by a whole 17sec. That's a whole lot more than you think it is.
— MunichRob (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:00:57 PM | | Votes: 0

Lexus, I read that car used at the Nurburgring was not a stock Nissan GT-R.

Anyone else heard this?
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:14:54 PM | | Votes: -2

What I heard was that the track wasnt completely dry and so the numbers werent as good as they can be on the stock model.
— GTR35 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 1:10:41 PM | | Votes: 3

This car really gets my heart going, that twin-turbo V-6 sounds mouth watering. I love the taillights on this car & just the overall shape, however I hate the spoiler on the back & basically the whole aftermarket look which is why I wouldn't buy one.

I would consider buying this car for the track because that's what it's ultimately built for & it's way more affordable than any other track tool of it's caliber.

Though if money weren’t an option in most minds of people with $100,000 to spend on a car & who are most likely over the age of 30, the Porsche would be the more appealing car over the Asian teenagers wet dream Nissan GT-R.

So I do wonder what demographic will be the main customer base for this car, I know it’s obviously going to sell I just wonder to who. CEO’s over 30 can get away with a Corvette no problem, but not so easily in a car that looks like "Ari's" assistant "Lloyd" from "Entourage" should be driving.
— MunichRob (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 10:55:52 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

I would like to see this Nissan race a F-35 Lighting off the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69.

:)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/30/2007 11:18:38 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

I think most of us will never get to drive this car and we'll have to buy the remote controlled Nissan GT-R at the local Sharper Image store to find out what all the hype is about.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 2:56:48 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Kaiser

Why do you have such a vested interest in the GTR not performing to the Nissan Claims ?

Or are you worried that Corvette sales will dwindle even further now that the GTR is headed Stateside ?
— I95SPEEDINGTICKETS (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 12:26:08 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

What I like about the GT-R's design, is it looks nieve just like the Porsche, but just like the Porsche it has incredible power and capability. It will definitly give a very hard time on the track and off to its competitors.

Great job Nissan, now I wish Lexus looked at the GT-R's power and tried to match that with its IS-F and not the damn M3.
— Designer1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 5:25:05 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

The rear is amazing, but I wish they made the front like the concept... It looks like its missing something in the front. But I can live with that. And you people have to remember, who ever buys those doesnt really care if its a beauty queen or an ugly bastard. Its a performance machine!
— M53R (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 10:07:29 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

all they really had to do was put the skin of the g-35 over it and it would look 100 times better
— 4x4rules (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2007 6:18:18 PM | | Votes: 1

I want this car more than I would want a good, loyal, loving, would-give-her-kidney-to-me-if-I-ever-needed-it kind of wife
— KZ258 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 12:00:25 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Was driving in the OC yesterday and ran into a big, stinking blob of yellow goo near the 91. Anybody here think it might have been EL34 in his native state?
— Lyall (View Profile)

Posted on 12/1/2007 2:23:29 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 5

But why would he be jealous?

If he says he can afford an X6 (most likely a $70K vehicle), shouldn't he be able to go out and buy a new GT-R?

Whoops, he can't.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:00:25 PM | | Votes: 2

Yah, whatever.

Has it ever occurred to you, bleek, that cars can co-exist? That Japanese cars can be excellent... without compromising European or American cars' competence? Why does one always have to be "the best?" Japanese cars are not universally class-leading. Not even close. Neither are European cars (well, they are in some markets). American cars... I won't get my feet wet in that.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:31:36 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

This car looks incredible in black.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 12:29:49 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

I really can't help myself get bemused by some of the idiotic comments by bloggers like "EL34", this guy is a total crackhead. To all bloggers like him, you will find thousands like me who will buy this car even if you guys called it a cheap nissan with bad styling and harsh ride, because simply you guys don't even know what you are talking about. The new GTR is an automotive benchmark in the subsupercar category, it a revolution in terms of technologies, and it's brand appeal is immense, even though some german fanboys can't seem to get that idea into their head. The GTR is a legend, and if you guys argue with me in that front then i will have to call you an idiot, because then you clearly don't know the history of the GTR. And for this current GTR, i am already in love with this car, it is got so much more of a presence than even the mighty Porsche 997. The 997 is more delicate, a bit lighter on it's wheels, but the GTR looks more well planted, i am sure that with those massive tires it will have even better grip and at high speed will me more stable because of a bit higher weight, but around very tight and slow corners i think the 997 will be a bit faster because of the lesser weight and better steering ratio. Even i love Porsches, frankly this is the only german brand that i truly love, because they haven't become as pedestrian and common as BMW, even though they are selling a lot of them, the styling is still very distinctly Porsche, and the feel of the car is retained through generations. Along with this though, i have also started to like this GTR a lot, actually way too much. I will leave it to my senses to decide, which is the better car, because in terms of figures both of the cars are pretty much neck and neck in performance.
— farabira1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 9:52:57 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

The new (Skyline) GT-R is one more reason why I'm a believer in the quality of Japanese cars.
— LexusLion (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 6:27:02 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

EL34,
Just put a propellor or star on it, you'll be fine.

The GT-R will be instantly recognizable to those who have a clue about cars (so basically that eliminates BMW's market).

Should interesting to see if it comes over as a Nissan or Infiniti.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/2/2007 11:44:35 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

Some people gets pride and joy posting random comments, bashing others, just so that others can respond. its their only joy in life...
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/3/2007 4:53:15 PM | | Votes: 2

Interesting read

My friend is a GT-R fanatic now. He was thinking about picking up the new M3, but now he can't stop thinking about the Nissan. He sent me an email with quotes from Jeremy Clarkson:

"The GT-R hasn't just moved the goalposts, it's obliterated them."

"For all-round ability, I have no doubt the Nissan is the best car I have ever driven."

"The GTR turns in beautifully, whether neutral or under brakes, and grips forever - slippery surfaces seem to bring out the best in it. Time after time I left Turner (911 Turbo) behind as my four-wheel-drive system and traction control worked better out of wet corners - it wasn't just the fact that I could get on the power earlier. It was about confidence. The Nissan really is something special, and you get the impression that while a master driver could wring every last ounce of performance out of the 911, your mother could do the same in the GT-R..........................Does the Nissan's ability reduce the driving pleasure? Not at all. You can turn all the systems off if you so choose, and it's still supremely well balanced, no doubt a delight for a racing driver on a track."

"A bellow from the engine, a rush of revs, a gigantic accelerative force on my neck, bang the GT-R into fourth. A killing gear if ever there was one."

"Were in R (mode) now, and weve hit 100mph in about 10 heartbeats. No official performance figure exists for that increment, but expect an 8 second 0-100ph time. Its fast, alrite - 60mph comes up in 3.5 seconds, the standing quarter in 11.7 seconds and it goes onto 197mph."

"The GT-R is all aggression on the outside. To my eye, it is a phenomal-looking machine, distinct from everything else. Very japanese and very hard."

"Driving these two cars back to back, its not long before you realise that the Nissan makes the Porsche seem old-fashioned. The GT-R is truly extraordinary."

"For all round ability, i have no doubt the Nissan is the best car i have ever driven. Its a solid car you can rely on when the going gets tricky."

Sounds like a killer... guess we'll just have to see.
— SVTruong (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2007 6:35:45 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

I wonder where the guy is who keeps posting that its mathmatically impossible for the GTR to go from 0-60 in 3.5secs is now lol.
— Obliv (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2007 6:33:31 PM | | Votes: 1

this car is a technical beast. But really anyone who HAS SEEN THIS CAR IN PERSON and doesnt think it is FUGLY is just plain blind..............or owns a WRX.

I guess pinnanfarina wasn't an option so they turned to subaru for design elements.

— 4x4rules (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2007 6:10:08 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Sorry, i meant a mitsubishi EVO

silly me I get them confused sometimes
— 4x4rules (View Profile)

Posted on 12/7/2007 6:06:46 PM | | Votes: 1

Add your Comments

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters): [img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent001.myautospies.com/images/sample.jpg[/img]

Email Me When Someone Replies To My Message

First Drive: Nissan GT-R Hits The Road!

About the Author

User Comments

Add your Comments

Submit an article

Photo Galleries

Cars

Autoshows

Latest Articles