Has LEAVING Ford Actually ADDED Cachet To The Jaguar And Land Rover Marques? And If SO, WHY?

Agent00R submitted on 4/5/2011 Official Bell & Ross Timestamp: 10:03:28 PM

11 user comments | Views : 6,631 | Category: Misc News | Source: www.autospies.com

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

For those with a fuzzy memory, before Tata controlled Jaguar Land Rover, the firm was owned by Ford.

Keep in mind this is when Ford was on a shopping spree and also picked up Volvo and Aston Martin.

Now that Ford has divested from Jaguar Land Rover, it appears to have been a good thing for the legendary marques. Products are becoming more unique and embraced while quality has stepped up from where it use to be.

With that said, would you agree that Jaguar and Land Rover have benefited from this move with a boost in cachet to the brands?

You think so? Tell us WHY in the comments down below.


2012 BMW M5 Concept Photo Gallery

2011 Del Mar Nationals Show Photo Gallery

2011 Porsche Panamera Turbo S Photo Gallery

2011 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 Photo Gallery

2012 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Coupe Photo Gallery


AutoSpies.com Photo Galleries

If you want to see your photos running on our homepage photo ticker, be sure to upload your photos on the go by sending them to Mobile@AutoSpies.com

Share on Facebook






Has LEAVING Ford Actually ADDED Cachet To The Jaguar And Land Rover Marques? And If SO, WHY?

About the Author

Agent00R

"There are two opinions in this world. Mine and the wrong one." -- Jeremy Clarkson

— Agent00R (View Profile)


User Comments

Lamborghini_vs_Ferrari_Racer

TATA is smart to let Jaguar and Land Rover operate independently unlike Ford which had a fetish for using cheap Ford parts on high end Jags and Landies

— Lamborghini_vs_Ferrari_Racer (View Profile)

Posted on 4/5/2011 10:39:17 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4   

cdoke

Which Ford parts made an appearance in the XJ, XK and Range Rover, besides electrical fasteners and the like?

Despite what you say, Jaguar and Land Rover were their own companies and did operate somewhat independent of Ford, with the notable exception of the X-type, keeping Jaguar firmly below Aston Martin,a nd some other things.

As far as the question- Jaguar and Land Rover are semi-niche brands; not quite like Maserati, but not like Mercedes or BMW either. As such, it benefits them to be free of a larger company like Ford, because it gives them more room to work. There is absolutely no way, for example, that Jaguar would have been allowed to even consider anything like a production version of the CX-75 (or anything even like it) while under the Ford upbrella. (although as a note the XJ220 and XJR-15 were produced when Jaguar was owned by Ford- but that was before Aston was)

I do have to say that I have noticed that in one last act of spite, the new Ford Taurus and Explorer look a little too much like the XJ and upcoming Land Rovers. It would appear that Ford's designers received a far too revealing tour of Jaguar/Land Rover before they were sold.

— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 4/6/2011 5:21:36 PM | | Votes: 1   

cdoke

..typo central, that message.

— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 4/6/2011 6:18:37 PM | | Votes: 0   

BondMI6

Hard to say and still too soon.

The current quality in the line up was actually planned when Ford owned them- not TATA.

And TATA vehicles are not known for high quality.

How many times have we all seen a TATA Nano catch fire on YouTube?

— BondMI6 (View Profile)

Posted on 4/5/2011 10:45:56 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Agent00R

@Bond

No doubt Ford had a helping hand in better quality but I was referencing more so Jaguar of the 80s -- yikes.

I was just speaking of the brand's progression since darker times.

— Agent00R (View Profile)

Posted on 4/5/2011 11:34:40 PM | | Votes: -1   

upwards

00r no backtracking please....

— upwards (View Profile)

Posted on 4/6/2011 2:38:40 AM | | Votes: 2   

quizz

The brand has progressed in quality thanks to Ford the last 10 years, but it remains to be seen what will happen once Tata takes control of the next generation of products.

— quizz (View Profile)

Posted on 4/6/2011 1:10:31 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Mugwump00

"more unique" ?! And from what?

— Mugwump00 (View Profile)

Posted on 4/6/2011 8:00:38 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

mini22

The forunner of the Jaguar XF was the S type. That shared the platform with Lincoln. The X type was a rebodied Ford Mondeo with awd. The V6 engines were simply retuned Ford Duratec. There were probably a lot of Ford parts that we don't even know about that were in all Jaguars.The one good thing that Ford did for Jaguar was to install quality control methods in construction of the cars. Jaguar are better built and more reliable then what they prior to Fords ownwership. The limitations were Fords corporate culture as far as R&D are concerned. It's amazing that Ford allowed aluminum construction on the previous XJ.An example of limitation is the headlight design for the XF. Jaguar had a better design but Ford told them it was too expensive. Tata really is catering to the needs of Jaguar and Landrover as a luxury entity. Ultimately Ford could not do this. So yes Jaguar/Landrover appear to be better off without Ford. Just look at the new products coming into the pipeline.

— mini22 (View Profile)

Posted on 4/7/2011 2:26:06 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

Add your Comments

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters): [img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent001.myautospies.com/images/sample.jpg[/img]