Agent001 I like to go top shelf, where Mama hides the cookies
	View My AgentSpace

85

Is It Just Me Or Are BMW's Designs Making The Competitors Rides Look Old Fashioned?

Agent001 submitted on 02/01/2008 Official AutoSpies Timestamp: 1:28 PM
from: www.autospies.com

[125] user comments | category: Spy Shots

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Tags: BMW, Audi, Mercedes

Tag Links: BMW, Audi, Mercedes

Is It Just Me Or Are BMW's Designs Making The Competitors Rides Look Old Fashioned?

Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]

jasaero - 2/1/2008 1:33:23 PM

+3 Boost

I think Jaguar's new XF and the new Cadillac CTS are actually better than anything BMW has out.

reply to this comment

jasaero - 2/1/2008 1:35:27 PM

-9 Boost

Will also admit Audi and MB are as you say though to my eyes also.

SVXXX - 2/1/2008 2:12:37 PM

+4 Boost

It is exactly the other way around! BMW's designs are actually nothing special with exception of couple.

pacotacolol - 2/1/2008 3:35:58 PMView My AgentSpace

-6 Boost

uh. it's not just you. notice the headlights. more clear, more neat. just better.

henbmw - 2/1/2008 3:44:28 PM

-12 Boost

I beg to differ....the 335i coupe or M3? 550i with sport pack or M5? M6? I think the XF is a giant leap for Jag and the CTS is a great achievement in design but I wouldn't place them as clear cut winners.

pacotacolol - 2/1/2008 4:07:41 PMView My AgentSpace

-7 Boost

the bimmer doesn't deserve a pole obstructing its photogentic style.

LexSucks - 2/1/2008 4:29:06 PM

-5 Boost

The headlights on the XF is a serious weakpoint. The XF's headlights look like they came from a Chrysler.

autopro - 2/1/2008 5:15:21 PMView My AgentSpace

-10 Boost

Too bad its junk.

tifoso471 - 2/1/2008 7:28:23 PM

-9 Boost

I agree about the Xf being the new standard, though the front is a little overdone.
I can understand what you mean about the bmw lookin modern, but I don't think it makes the new c-class or the new a4 lok a generation older. In fact, the newest c-class, and a4 sedans are both brilliant.

Auto_expert - 2/4/2008 10:20:55 AM

+2 Boost

Yep. Jag XF design is garbage. If you want that look you could get a 2004 Chrysler Sebring and save some cash.

Brembo - 2/1/2008 1:39:41 PM

+5 Boost

Stop smoking the pipe!

reply to this comment

Agent001 - 2/1/2008 1:40:02 PMView My AgentSpace

0 Boost

LOL!

001

vdiv - 2/1/2008 3:29:23 PM

-8 Boost

better yet, pass it along.

BMW designs might appear innovative and interesting, but they no longer follow function and in my view are inferior.

Auto_expert - 2/4/2008 10:23:58 AM

0 Boost

That's right. Everyone dogs the BMW design, yet they are people still buy them in droves and their competitors copy them and call them out in ads. Go figure. I see this continuing. For those of you sitting in your rocking chairs, if you want a boring, dated-looking car buy a Lexus.

drew630 - 2/1/2008 1:41:51 PM

+5 Boost

Actually I see it the other way around. BMW's competitors are making BMW's look old fashioned.

reply to this comment

drew630 - 2/1/2008 1:43:44 PM

+2 Boost

*Especially on the inside.

M35MT - 2/4/2008 10:44:41 AMView My AgentSpace

+1 Boost

+++1

BMW's styling holds up well over time but is nothing special, very conservative like a navy suit and red tie. I prefer a more progressive look. Don't get me wrong, I still think they look great, especially the front of the 5-Series. The Bangle butt need some work.

Their interiors are a serious weakpoint.

AMGZING_fanboy - 2/1/2008 1:42:01 PM

-2 Boost

I think your sniffing too much LA Smog

reply to this comment

Obliv - 2/1/2008 1:44:04 PM

+5 Boost

Its just you :P

reply to this comment

dbs600old - 2/1/2008 1:46:07 PM

-9 Boost

the c in that photo looks too plasticy and modular, whereas the 3 look has more of a jewel like attention to detail with smaller individual parts.

reply to this comment

dbs600old - 2/1/2008 3:57:05 PM

-1 Boost

wow, i must have said something really wrong! anyway, whose for getting those window switches back to the center console where they belong!? anyone?

dbs600old - 2/1/2008 4:02:07 PM

0 Boost

guess the whole industry is against me on that one though.

TauronB2G - 2/1/2008 1:47:46 PM

+3 Boost

Its you dude!!!
T

reply to this comment

Blakura - 2/1/2008 1:48:56 PM

+4 Boost

Get off the bandwagon, and the pipe. I'm sick of all the bmw hype, those "great" engines and powertrains are balanced off with bland interiors, expensive options, leatherette, and expensive repair and maintenance bills after the warranty is up.

reply to this comment

henbmw - 2/1/2008 3:47:55 PM

-9 Boost

Just like American vehicles are balanced with mediocre powertrains, lackluster warranties and boring designs. By balanced I mean consistently behind the competition

enthusiastx11 - 2/1/2008 4:29:42 PM

-3 Boost

hey blakura.

it's ok that you don't get it.

LexSucks - 2/1/2008 4:54:38 PM

0 Boost

Expensive repair and maintenance bills?

The BMW reliability myth seems to be in full swing? LOL! Always spawned by BMW haters.

I've had a BMW that's been out of warranty for 2 years.

Guess what. No expensive repair bills. Next time try to post something that is actually factual.

henbmw - 2/2/2008 12:30:53 AM

-1 Boost

Wow, someone doesn't like me.

bobs4state - 2/2/2008 12:31:36 AM

+1 Boost

Hey Lexsucks - I love my BMW too, but anyone who has had one for any amount of time, knows that post-warranty maintenance and repairs are VERY expensive. Have you put brakes on your BMW yet? YOWZA!!

85bmw745i - 2/3/2008 3:33:58 AMView My AgentSpace

-1 Boost

I put on my own brakes. step one jack up car. step two remove tire. step 3 remove two bolts. step 4 lift cal;iper. step 5 remove old pads. step 6 spread piston. step 7 put on new pads. step 8 instal caliper and install two bolts from step 3. step 9 install tire. step 10 repeat on other side. for mercedes, remove two pins rather than bolts on step 3. total time about 20-30 minutes to do both front wheels. cost of parts about $40 less or more depending on the quality of the pad. Super easy and almost completely idiot proof. brake jobs are some of the quickest money makers. I know I am a mechanic. Oh yeah, dont forget to change the $4 brake pad wear sensor. All of my BMW's have been very reliable, especially my old 87 325e. All I have ever done is tires and oil changes and periodic checks of fluids and belt conditions. and I run the living piss out of that car.

_43LE - 2/1/2008 1:50:33 PM

+9 Boost

001, It's just you.

reply to this comment

Boosteroo - 2/1/2008 1:50:54 PM

+5 Boost

Recent BMWs look more Asain than actual Asian cars do these days!

I think they forgot all about Form Following Function.

reply to this comment

DW1968 - 2/2/2008 3:51:08 AM

-2 Boost

Agreed, but this is by intent, though...luxury auto sales in Asian markets are growing very quickly, relative to other, more "mature"/"saturated" markets like US & Europe.

VISO - 2/2/2008 1:48:29 PM

+1 Boost

Yeah, I know what you mean. I always confuse the rear of the new 3-Series with a Hyundai Elantra.

GermanNut - 2/1/2008 1:52:13 PM

-1 Boost

001 you were driving up to Hollywood to meet your bud connect.

You probably had some in the car before you got there and that is why the BMW designs were making the competitors rides look old fashioned.

Lay off the weed, 001.

reply to this comment

VISO - 2/2/2008 1:47:47 PM

-1 Boost

It's just you Agent 001!

keyzi747 - 2/1/2008 1:55:59 PM

-3 Boost

Do this: put the BMW photo beside a 2008 Caddy CTS photo. I this this will correct your vision.

reply to this comment

Agent001 - 2/1/2008 2:01:10 PMView My AgentSpace

-1 Boost

I think the Caddy CTS is better looking than the A4 (Even the new one) and the C-Class, but the 3-Series with Sport pack sends them all to the back of the bus.

001

1995e34 - 2/1/2008 2:54:34 PM

-4 Boost

particularly with these wheels

http://www.finishlinewheels.com/specimg/3122F059.jpg

pacotacolol - 2/1/2008 4:10:44 PMView My AgentSpace

-14 Boost

caddy better than a a4. what a laughfable concept. if its the cts-v the you are on to something

Agent001 - 2/2/2008 12:09:47 AMView My AgentSpace

+3 Boost

I said I thought it LOOKED better than an A4, not BETTER than an A4.

001

RealitySmack - 2/1/2008 1:57:22 PM

-4 Boost

I like BMW's designs. They have better engineered cars (safety, looks, etc) than some of their competition.

reply to this comment

EvoAudi - 2/1/2008 2:00:51 PMView My AgentSpace

-1 Boost

what you talkin' 'bout willis?

reply to this comment

Czelinski - 2/1/2008 2:07:45 PM

-6 Boost

Above comment, lol...and...

It;s just you. And both cars pictured look stunning anyway!

reply to this comment

theoptimisticpessimist - 2/1/2008 2:16:16 PM

-6 Boost

I agree with you. BMW design are polarizing but they have a very difined modernity to them.

MB seem to be slipping back in to attractive but safe designs.

As much as I love Audi and think it's design are still the most beautiful, the seem to be growing staid in their designs. I think is because of two factors; first Audi is copied a lot, second the have seem to adhered with the same design movement for a very long time, opting for more for evolutionary than revolutionary.

Modern and beautiful are two separate things.

reply to this comment

VISO - 2/2/2008 1:52:35 PM

0 Boost

Copied what? Generally, Audi is acknowledged for setting its own design trends and everyone tends copy them. Sorry, but your statement doesn't fly with the general accepted norm.

Yonder7 - 2/1/2008 2:17:14 PM

-8 Boost

The beauty is in the eyes of the behoder. To my eyes BMW looks fine but I prefer MB, however M3 is an eception to the rule it is the best looking BMW.

reply to this comment

0to60 - 2/1/2008 2:28:12 PM

+4 Boost

001 are you blind!?! Maybe its time to get that precription up'ed a bit in those glasses of yours...

reply to this comment

CLK63BlackSeries - 2/1/2008 2:34:32 PMView My AgentSpace

+6 Boost

It's just you.

reply to this comment

vman1013 - 2/1/2008 2:35:31 PM

-11 Boost

If for one agree with 001. BMW is the design leader! Always cutting edge and risky. A lot of people don't appreciate that though.

Audi's sedans haven't changed much since 2000. Which means that the new ones look like the old ones.

Mercedes strong suit is the SL and CL - even the GL is growing on me. The SL and CL are clear leaders but the new SL is going in the wrong direction! The C looks Camry-ish and the rear is disproportionate to the rest of the car. Don't even get me started on that POS CLC.

CTS is a great looking car. Interior is inferior!

And to all those that swear BMW has bland interiors - lay off the bud. BMW interiors are great with quality materials. You may not like them, but that by no means makes them cheap!

reply to this comment

vman1013 - 2/4/2008 12:06:58 PM

+1 Boost

haters!

1995e34 - 2/1/2008 2:43:46 PM

-3 Boost

i think bmw designs made the others look old a few years ago. but since then, bangle inspired the industry as a whole to deviate from the staid designs that were plaguing our streets. we now have many flavors of sir bangle's work. almost every major manufacturer is offering their version of a masterpiece.



reply to this comment

enthusiastx11 - 2/1/2008 3:10:40 PM

-3 Boost

you are correct.

take the 3-series for example. in comparison the A4 looks ancient and the IS blends into the woodwork. the C-class looks good but not considering it's brand new.

reply to this comment

bobs4state - 2/2/2008 12:33:24 AM

-2 Boost

I think the new A4 is beautiful!

Hwany - 2/1/2008 3:27:01 PM

-1 Boost

E90 3 series is one of the boring looking car from BMW.

Their coupe version, E92, is actually much much better in every angle.

The MB C-class puts the BMW 3 series sedan into shame with their design. C-class looks 10000 times better than the girly looking E90 3 series, especially the hideous tail lights.

reply to this comment

JRobUSC - 2/1/2008 11:24:02 PM

+1 Boost

from the front, the new C and new A4 demolish the E90 sedan (and I have one, so it pains me to say that). But the side view of a sport E90 kills the others -- the wheels and shoulder line give it an aggressive look the others can't match. From the back frankly none of them are that great. I'd give the edge to the A4 but can't because a Civic and an Audi are indistinguishable from behind. So they all tie for last place.

2ndbimmer - 2/1/2008 3:33:15 PM

-7 Boost

They are classic because they dont overdo. I love the BMW look because it doesnt have too much going on. The cars that are too busy age fast.

reply to this comment

enthusiastx11 - 2/1/2008 4:31:53 PM

-6 Boost

thankfully, you are in the minority. and the people who agree that BMWs are well-designed is growing quite nicely. revenue up 14% for 2007 and expected to beat that for 2008! amazing growth for a huge company.

reply to this comment

KEVINBSL500 - 2/1/2008 3:48:54 PM

-1 Boost

I Agree w/you. I must say..I think almost evey BMW looks really good. Im from L.A its not the smog.

reply to this comment

Chip - 2/1/2008 3:57:53 PM

-7 Boost

WOW the BMW haters are out today.

I agree 001, they are the standard for modern cars, and as many others have pointed out, everyone is trying to catch up with them. Everyone.

Their engines are amazing, the exterior design flawless, build quality superb and they drive like nothing else on the road. Add in high resale value, amazing technology, excellent reliabilty for a german car, and that "magic feel", and you have one hell of a car. Mercedes, Audi, Infiniti, Lexus etc dont have that "magic feel" no matter how hard they try,

Im on my 4th BMW and I dont plan on switching anytime soon.




reply to this comment

Chip - 2/3/2008 2:20:14 PM

0 Boost

"Please don't switch because BMW loves taking your money."- And I love driving their cars

"You are making the Quandt family richer and richer every single day!" - I know tell me about it, they have really proven themselves with their fantastic products.

"You are a servant of BMW, you will do what they tell you, bow down to them loyal subject. You will buy the next car they produce, and give them your money."- You bet your sweet ass I will.

And your point?

LexSucks - 2/1/2008 4:57:22 PM

-4 Boost

Breaking new ground in aesthetics only. The actual driving experience is still better with the BMW.

reply to this comment

enthusiastx11 - 2/1/2008 4:33:28 PM

-1 Boost

imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

thank you lexus for the compliment.

reply to this comment

bmwfan1513 - 2/1/2008 4:40:43 PM

-7 Boost

BMW has the best designs.

reply to this comment

Carboy - 2/1/2008 5:11:39 PMView My AgentSpace

-5 Boost

It's like:


Funky or Casual


reply to this comment

AgentOrange - 2/1/2008 5:13:16 PMView My AgentSpace

-2 Boost

The only opinions which really matter are from those who open their wallets.
I just traded my 2003 BMW Z4 for a new BMW 128i Cabrio - and I like all of the Bangle era designs...
And yes, my Z4 looked as fresh after 5 years as it did when I first saw pics of it in the summer of 2002...


reply to this comment

Rupert - 2/1/2008 7:10:22 PMView My AgentSpace

-9 Boost

True - I still think the Z4 looks great, and it's amazing how well the polarizing 7 series design has stood the test of time.

farabira1 - 2/1/2008 5:17:54 PM

+5 Boost

Well the BMW 3 series looks plain and non attractive when in comparison with the robust and sculpted looking Cadillac CTS, gosh even the Lexus IS and the Infiniti G35 looks better to the eye. Problem with BMW design is that they have a crease here and a bump there and overall the design does not look to be part of one whole structure, but rather looks to be made of bits and pieces from somewhere. I mean just look at the 5 series and the 6 series, both have crease lines that run on the sides but nothing to go along on the front or back, and then you have humped backs with the trunk lids bumped above the line of the surface that contains the lights, which until now was on the same plane as the rest of the body. And take a look at the crooked eyes of the 5 sereis, makes the car look like a panda face. 001 how can you make such an outrageous claim for a design theme that put simply looks plain ugly, well if you have eyes. Besides look at the direct competitors to the 5 series and 6 series, the Audi A5, Jaguar XF, and the Jaguar XK, all have a much tauter body with strong stance and but still managing to look desirable. Especially the Jags, the new design theme is very upscale modern with the cars looking to made of glossy sheetmetal wrapping around a beautifully finished body and the design is pure, sculpted, and simply aesthetic rather than the mundane and out place designs of the BMWs. BMW should have fired Bangle a long time ago.

reply to this comment

autopro - 2/1/2008 5:18:27 PMView My AgentSpace

-3 Boost

I like a good looking car as much as the next guy,but its more important how it drives and the quality of materials inside the car.

reply to this comment

Steve - 2/1/2008 5:27:49 PM

+1 Boost

"Modern" or "trendy" does not necessarily equate to a lasting or meaningful style statement. Take a look at some of the classic Mercedes from the 1960s, which are still considered beautiful (though not modern) by today's standards, four decades later! That's the "test of time" that "Agent 001" referred to a while ago in one of his postings.

I don't believe that time will be so kind to today's "styling language" from BMW. That's not to say that BMW's current cars are ugly (though they are not attractive to my eye). It just means that some fashion trends are fleeting.

A Canali suit is always fashionable, even though it may not reflect the latest fashion trend.

reply to this comment

DaHarder - 2/1/2008 8:48:36 PM

+5 Boost

"Style Is Timeless Yet Fashion's Only Now"

Hall & Oats

Rupert - 2/2/2008 12:55:18 PMView My AgentSpace

+2 Boost

"The only thing that goes out of fashion is fashion itself. Style stays forever"
Coco Chanel.

S4cabriofoxone - 2/1/2008 5:59:02 PMView My AgentSpace

+1 Boost

Sorry 001, but this picture actually makes the C-Class look far more attractive.

I think the E90 design (3 Series sedan) is a major snoozefest. It's only the coupe that's really hot.

The M3 sedan is also quite attractive, but it shares the E92's front end.

reply to this comment

t_bone - 2/1/2008 8:15:37 PM

-1 Boost

I agree S4. To my eyes this picture particularly makes me prefer the C-class...and it looks more modern, too...not to mention it is a coherent design instead of a hodgepodge of intersecting lines.

Hwany - 2/1/2008 10:17:41 PM

-2 Boost

Are u the M3post T-bone?

Star - 2/1/2008 8:00:39 PM

-7 Boost

There is no doubt that BMW makes the most desirable cars on the market both in terms of performance and modern design. YES, they do make their competitors look old fashioned and yes there are a lot of BMW haters(all people with bad taste or zero knowledge when it comes to cars). BMW cars today are by far the best looking cars on the road.

reply to this comment

Htay7500 - 2/1/2008 10:28:00 PM

-1 Boost

umm, right.

Kinger - 2/4/2008 5:00:56 AM

0 Boost

Vendetta is a German car hater. What else do you expect him to say.

chewy - 2/1/2008 8:44:43 PMView My AgentSpace

-3 Boost

No, the C class looks better and fresher than the 3 series.

reply to this comment

Tour18 - 2/1/2008 8:54:52 PM

+2 Boost

Banglemobiles are lame on the exterior.

reply to this comment

Htay7500 - 2/1/2008 10:16:34 PM

-2 Boost

Im gonna admit that the c-class looks a bit better than the 3 sedan. but respectfully, the CTS wins the looks dep.

reply to this comment

MeanVulcan - 2/1/2008 11:29:48 PM

-2 Boost

When I look at a Hyundai and then a 3-series, the 3-series looks very plain to me too!

reply to this comment

SixxFive - 2/1/2008 11:51:06 PM

-2 Boost

I agree with 001 - the simple yet modern design elements of BMW design makes others look outdated.

reply to this comment

huu76 - 2/2/2008 12:05:05 AM

+1 Boost

It's just you 001.

reply to this comment

Htay7500 - 2/2/2008 8:21:22 AM

-1 Boost

the only decent looking BMW is the 3 series coupe and thats it. The only good looking bmws were pre-bangle, when they had their own distinct look.

reply to this comment