Agent00J
Agent00J
Life is too short to drive boring cars...
View My AgentSpace

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Is Jaguar’s XF good enough to compete with the best???
Jaguar has a lot riding on the success of its newest midsize luxury sedan the XF.  Initial press has been pretty generous to the newest cat, but the question remains, is it enough to run with, and ultimately beat the best of the class? 

In a culture that yearns to have something newer and better than everyone else, the Jaguar certainly has a lot of style and charm going for it.  A comprehensive standard equipment list, and aggressive styling combine in a package that while not for everyone, should be able to penetrate the broader market and capture some of the Lexus, Mercedes and BMW buyers.

Aimed squarely at the GS, E-class, 5-Series and even Audi’s A6, the Jaguar has some very worthy competitors.  Both the E-class and 5-Series are nearing the end of their current product cycles soon to be replaced with what one can naturally assume to be even better cars than currently available, it begs the question, did Jaguar go far enough to make the XF a true competitor at its price point?

I spent some time this week looking at the Jaguar and pondering the question at hand.  The biggest criticism I have of the car is the fact that Jaguar DID NOT put the jumping cat on the hood.  There is nothing on the hood to let the world know that this is a Jaguar.  In my opinion this was a big mistake on the part of Jaguar.

Are potential buyers at this price point willing to give the cat a chance, and see what it has to offer, or will the Jaguar continue to be a niche player that ultimately results in a collective yawn from the rest of the industry?

We want to know your thoughts.  Have you had a chance to look at the Jaguar in person, perhaps drive it or even buy it?

shows.autospies.com/gallery/2008-Bimmerfest-77/



Is Jaguar’s XF good enough to compete with the best???



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]

adamsaf723adamsaf723 - 5/3/2008 8:36:15 AM
+5 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It's a beautiful car, but I don't think we'll know if it's a good value until we see some long-term testing.

This is a major improvement over the S-Type, that's one thing I'm sure everyone can agree on.


reply to this comment
randy33randy33 - 5/5/2008 2:08:38 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
'Beautiful car'? NO, sorry -- the entire front half of this car is FUGLY. It is Buick-looking and a complete disgrace. The conservative tail cannot make up for the ugliness in the beginning.


pushrod27pushrod27 - 5/3/2008 8:46:54 AM
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
You can, indeed get a 'leaper' statue of the Jaguar on the hood of your XF as a dealer installed optional accessory. I saw an old guy driving a dark green XF in Philadelphia last week, and his had the leaper statue on the hood.

reply to this comment
Agent00JAgent00J - 5/3/2008 8:54:40 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
My point in making that comment is that Jaguar did not include it from the factory, and since that cat like the 3-pointed star of Mercedes, or the propeller of BMW is part of the overall character of the car, I think it was a mistake to leave off.


LUXCAR32LUXCAR32 - 5/3/2008 4:50:33 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
But like mercedes, on the sportier sedans and coupes they incorporate the emblem into the grill rather than on top of the hood. Jaguar was going for a sporty, fresh, new look so of course they wouldn't want the leaping jaguar on a car thats supposed to be sleek and sporty. They wanted to show that this car is completely different from past sedans. And it's not like the leaping jaguar holds a ton of good memories for current buyers.


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/3/2008 6:40:04 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
All hood ornaments are now illegal on any redesigned or all new cars in Europe. They were legislated off the cars and come under the pedestrian front impact safety standard rules.




cdokecdoke - 5/3/2008 6:44:31 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
What about the Spirit of Ecstasy?


MonkMonk - 5/4/2008 12:15:16 AMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
the spirit of ecstasy is supposed to retract if it senses an imminent crash
the mercedes star better stay as an emblem on the sedans...if not, i will be very very very very mad
lol



cdokecdoke - 5/4/2008 1:13:15 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"the spirit of ecstasy is supposed to retract..."

I am aware that it does so, but Jagexpert stated all hood ornaments...which would be tragic.



bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 5/4/2008 9:00:56 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
it may be just a factory accesory because the new XJ is available with or without, instead of making it standard its a FACTORY accesory


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/4/2008 3:05:49 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The Rolls was redesigned before the Hood ornament rules took full effect. So it is still grandfathered.


M35erM35er - 5/3/2008 8:54:56 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I like it but think they blew it on the front. For a luxury brand and especially for a brand like Jaguar, that is a BIG mistake. Otherwise love the lines, back end and interior. Hope it does well. I will consider when the time comes.

reply to this comment
LUXCAR32LUXCAR32 - 5/3/2008 4:52:08 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
agreed, what happened to those amazing headlights shown on the concept, these ones are horrible! I haven't seen the car in person yet, but from pictures they just do not look good.


LUXCAR32LUXCAR32 - 5/3/2008 4:52:09 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
agreed, what happened to those amazing headlights shown on the concept, these ones are horrible! I haven't seen the car in person yet, but from pictures they just do not look good.


Batman219Batman219 - 5/3/2008 8:54:59 AM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The XF-C concept was gorgeous but somewhere along the translation from concept to production they f-ed it up.

reply to this comment
1evlaudi1evlaudi - 5/3/2008 11:27:05 AMView My AgentSpace
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Completely agree with that, once the Ford penny counters came in, that was it. The finished product is somewhat good looking, but nowhere close to the concept.
And it is built like a Ford, I went over that car with a fine tooth comb and the details are terrible; body gaps, finish of the rubber around the door handles, finish of the sheet metals and their paint treatment, you name it.

But you know what, it doesn't matter because people are buying it, so good for Jag.



LUXCAR32LUXCAR32 - 5/3/2008 4:54:09 PM
-2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
yeah the interior doesn't exactly scream high quality in the pics. hopefully with the new owners of jag we'll see a slight refresh in a few years that will up the quality.


cdokecdoke - 5/3/2008 6:32:56 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
You could not be farther from the truth. The interior is very well done. I hate quoting this because it makes me sound like a fan boy but, Autoblogs words on the XF interior- ":The fit, finish and execution are totally unmatched in this highly competitive class and we can say with impunity that nothing short of a Roller or a Bentley comes close to the design and materials inside the XF."


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/3/2008 6:42:02 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The lights on the concept are not yet legal. They are too narrow at the inside corner to put out enough lumens. so they had to compromise


AUTO_UNIONAUTO_UNION - 5/3/2008 9:04:00 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
From the looks alone I say it can compete!

reply to this comment
GinsterCQGinsterCQ - 5/3/2008 9:21:24 AM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think the looks lost a bit from concept to actual, but nonetheless, a good looking car. I think it is a million times better than the S type ever could be. Personally, I'm a bit disappointed there's no six, but oh well.

I really think the ultimate success is going to based upon reliability and resale value, neither of which Jaguar is known for. If it is as big a piece as the S type, it will not retain value, and once the initial sales boom is over, it'll sell just like the S type did.


reply to this comment
JRobUSCJRobUSC - 5/3/2008 11:14:49 AM
-2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
what does the "even" mean when you say "aimed squarely at the GS, E-class, 5-Series and even Audi’s A6"? The A6 competes with all those cars, too, is the "even" meant to imply something?

reply to this comment
Agent00JAgent00J - 5/3/2008 12:40:37 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The "even" was not meant to imply anything. I own a A6 in addition to the M3 I drive.


autoproautopro - 5/3/2008 11:27:32 AMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Its too expensive,and the timing couldn't be worse.I bet they have to offer lease support from the get go.

reply to this comment
Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/3/2008 9:31:21 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I sold 10 of them by myself last month with no lease support.


cdokecdoke - 5/3/2008 1:30:54 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"Is Jaguar’s XF good enough to compete with the best???"

Motor Trend recently conducted a comparison study between the XF, the E, the 5 series and the GS. I have only seen the video and have not been able to find it in print yet. They placed the XF first. The results in total were similar to that in the AutoZeitung comparison, but with the E and the XF transposed.


reply to this comment
Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/3/2008 9:32:40 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
See the video at my site http://www.jaguarnewswire.com/2008/04/jaguar-newswire-motor-trend-has-winner.html


HoofHeartedHoofHearted - 5/8/2008 5:41:55 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The German magazines, surprisingly, always seem to put their home-grown products first.


auto001auto001 - 5/3/2008 1:53:34 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I wouldn't say expensive. It's definitely cheaper than the E class, 5 thousand more than GS, and 3 thousand more than A6 quattro (but Audi only has 255hp) and same price as 528i (both with 300hp, but Jag is a V8).

Not too crazy about the front (looks similar to a Legacy) but the overall styling is stunning... Jaguars always had one of best styling (aside from the S-type).


reply to this comment
mplsmpls - 5/3/2008 3:26:22 PM
-4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
XF is not a Jaguar anymore.. the designer copied ideas from many other car manufacturers..

reply to this comment
LUXCAR32LUXCAR32 - 5/3/2008 4:58:04 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
ok comment like that, please give examples, otherwise i just ignore it.


senorgatosenorgato - 5/3/2008 3:28:35 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It's already got the "been there done that" look about it. It's fairly mundane looking in person. I saw one right in front of an MB CLS and the CLS still looked fresh, new, and exciting. The XF, not so much.

reply to this comment
bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 5/4/2008 9:06:15 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
the cls looks good from some angles but it certainly looks dated now i saw one on the road, and they are starting to look dated its not a desighn that ages well. The XF isnt quite as polarizing as the CLS so i imagine it will age better than the CLS,


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/3/2008 5:18:09 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Yes.

When I first saw it on the road (which I have several times now), I was happy (and relieved) to see that it is beautiful. You don't really notice the headlights--it's the overall shape of the car that you can't help but admire. I think it puts every other car in this class to shame.


reply to this comment
lyonboylyonboy - 5/3/2008 8:10:08 PM
-6 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I find the XF BLAH and derivative. A little MB CLS, a little Lexus GS, a little Ford Taurus rear window. The interior is straight out of a Lincoln Navigator. The XF is the first Jaguar not to look like a Jaguar, some accomplishment!

reply to this comment
Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/3/2008 9:34:11 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
As usual you are so far off base.


bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 5/4/2008 9:02:31 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
actualy your wrong there the Jaguar XF, actually looks alot like a Jaguar Mark X, which had the same mission as the XF in its time


lyonboylyonboy - 5/4/2008 1:26:30 AM
-3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Twelve months from now we will know. Jaguar fans said the new XK was going to save Jaguar, it is selling worse than the previous generation. The XF is selling better than the S-type! Whoa now there is a feat.

reply to this comment
bmwdrvrbmwdrvr - 5/4/2008 9:07:32 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
is there stats or numbers for that, because from my understanding the Jaguar XK is selling fine


Agent63Agent63 - 5/4/2008 4:12:43 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Yes, it's good enough to compete with the best.

Many have criticized the design to look very similar to the Ford Mondeo and I'm 50/50 on that. It doesn't matter, the car has Aston-appeal and a refined interior, much needed for Jaguar.

Two thumbs up!
I'd buy one.


reply to this comment
M53RM53R - 5/4/2008 6:22:36 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
<a href="http://m53r.myautospies.com/users/173/Dubai-Auto-Show-2007/15112007(066).jpg" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this, {captionId: ''})"><img src="http://m53r.myautospies.com/users/173/Dubai-Auto-Show-2007/15112007(066).jpg" style="width: 540px; border: solid 1px #000000;" alt="" /></a>

I hope this works ^^

Anyways, when I saw the XF in real, I was very impressed.. It had the appeal and agressive stance of an Aston!


reply to this comment
HoofHeartedHoofHearted - 5/8/2008 5:35:58 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
These ridiculous comments about it being a copy of this and a copy of that hardly deserve reply. In the flesh the XF looks much better than the photo's suggest. To be honest I really think that they missed a golden opportunity to make it look stunning by using the original concept car front, but just take a look inside one - Wow! Stunning! I want one!


ubercoolubercool - 5/4/2008 10:49:23 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Everything about this car is bang on the money, the R version will hammer the final nail in the coffin for the competition, can't wait.

Looking forward to seeing a coupe and convertible XF aswell:-)


reply to this comment
lyonboylyonboy - 5/4/2008 1:44:54 PM
-3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
247 XK were sold in Marc 07 vs 506 in March 06. The XF is very heavy for its size. The XJ is lighter and much roomier and better looking.

reply to this comment
Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/4/2008 3:11:52 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Iyon thats was the first month that the XK was on sale. March 2006, so of course it sold more than March 2007. But it is selling well. I know because I sell them. Its our most expensive car and before the XF launch it was our biggest seller. I know thats more a comment on the S the X and the XJ for sure, but it is solid. I am trading in a lot of cars each month on XK's. Especially 6 series, SL's and a ton of Lexus's


Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/4/2008 8:09:41 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
AUTOCAR SAYS:

Verdict

Job done. In the XF Jaguar has delivered what it so desperately needed: a world-class product. It’s not quite perfect — the packaging is slightly compromised, some niggling fit issues remain, and with just one diesel the range is limited — but even considering these concerns the XF is not only good enough to bring Jaguar success, but also good enough to better the 5-series.
This is due in part to the styling, which is bold and distinctive, and to the slick interior. But mostly it’s because the drivetrain and dynamics shame even BMW and Mercedes. Yes, the diesel engine is not the most potent, but it is refined and precise, and the gearbox works brilliantly with it.
Above all else, though, it is the chassis tuning that defines the XF’s success; the blend of ride comfort, poise and agility is nothing short of a triumph.



reply to this comment
1995e341995e34 - 5/4/2008 11:00:44 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
i like it a lot. i want one with volvo's turbocharged i-6 in it, and a clutch. but i don't expect that volvo i-6 to be seen in this car anytime soon since tata runs things now.

a jaguar without a i-6, though not as sinful as a bimmer without a i-6, is incomplete. i'm sure the v8 performs well, but i prefer a tad more efficiency (for ethical reasons, NOT financial reasons).

i find it funny that EVERYONE on this site seems to think acura will never be taken seriously without a v8, but jaguar can survive without a bread and butter 6 cylinder. seems a tad hypocritical.

i'd have trouble picking between this and a 5 series if i could pick one car. I have a feeling that when the new E-class arrives, the dilemma will worsen.


reply to this comment
AudiphileAudiphile - 5/5/2008 12:29:49 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The car is lovely both inside and out. I especially like it in the "Emerald Fire" color.

I test-drove it yesterday - and my head didn't hit the ceiling! Hurray! The new transmission selector is great, a lot less confusing than the BMW's automatic gate. The normally aspirated 4.2-liter V8 is more than adequate for everday use. The steering feel is good. I will have to take it out on a track to test the handling.

Add this English rose to my "short list" of car choices this December.

That 4.2-liter V8 is fine for every-day use.


reply to this comment
farabira1farabira1 - 5/5/2008 8:27:11 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
What is the formula for a successful luxury car:

Looks good
Has a high quality interior
Has plenty of Power
And is reliable

According to JD power reviews, Jaguar has been the most reliable luxury automaker of last 3 or more years, and certainly the XF looks hot and modern(for all those yelling about the front, get over it, i have seen the front and it looks very good, and edgy), the interior is just unmatchable in this class, the car drives well, has good steering feedback, and packs a punch.

So short answer: yes XF has all the right ingredients for making a great selling luxury car.


reply to this comment
ubercoolubercool - 5/6/2008 1:52:34 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The XF is awesome.

reply to this comment
BelgocarfanBelgocarfan - 5/8/2008 6:19:08 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think the car mostly looks great but can't help to always think the front end looks like a Chrysler Sebring personally. The prototype was fantasticm, with a much more agressive look in the front. Here's what the front reminds me of now:

http://www.carspace.com/arvin1/Albums/American%20Car%20Album/originals/chrysler-sebring-8017.jpg/photo/v./original.jpg


reply to this comment
Jagexpert2Jagexpert2 - 5/8/2008 8:30:30 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Dude you have to be smoking something nasty to think those two cars look anything alike. What a moron!



To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Top 10 Vehicles with Highest-Precentage of Male DriversVideo: Extreme testing for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLKDodge Challenger drag-racing version coming soonOne, Two, Three! Did Acura Strike Out With The TSX?Alfa Romeo unveils Mille Miglia Special EditionIs This Fair? GM Cancels Health Benefits For Striking WorkersExpect to pay over $90,000 for the Nissan GT-RInsanity? Audi Decides That 580hp In a RS6 Just Isn't Enough, 613hp On It's Way2011 BMW 1-series spy imagesThe Audi A6 scoopAC Schnitzer MINI Clubman SVolvo spices up its V70 wagon with R-Design packageWorld's first test of A4 fighter: 2009 Acura TSX Ford Mustang Bullitt Review (video)All-New Ford Flex poised to deliver a quiet rideVideo: V10-Powered R8 Spotted On The RoadComparison: 2008 BMW X6 xDrive35i vs. 2009 Infiniti FX35 AWDModern Street Car System Proposed for Dallas - BUT WOULD YOU RIDE???VW TIGUAN at DEALERS NOW - Ready for YOU???FUNNY COMMERCIALS INVOLVING CARS - Is it just Me, or are these Funny???Video: First 2010 Mercedes-Benz commercialGM may not offer Cadillac CTS Convertible2009 Ford Escape - First DriveHigh Gas Prices: Are We Actually Sitting On A Gas Bubble?Audi Takes Inventor Of The Year Award For Use Of Space Frame TechnologyVideo: Lotus Eagle Spied Testing on the RingSpied: 2010 Audi TT ClubsportWhat Is The Most Prestigious Brand?BMW testing cars with solar panelsVolt mules already getting 40 miles on electric only!The 2009 VW Tiguan SUV Is Nice- But Does It Have A Chance In Hell Against The New Honda CR-V?Video: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V around the Nurburgring in 7:59.32Video: Jaguar XF Supercharged vs. BMW 550i, Mercedes E550, Audi A6AC Schnitzer's 226-hp MINI Cooper Clubman SMazda1 minicar concept coming to Paris with Nagari design style2009 Hyundai Sonata and 2008 Chevrolet Malibu More Fuel-Efficient than Toyota Camry and Honda AccordAudi R8 V10 Video -spotted in the Wild Paul McCartney 's New LS600H Emits More CO2 In Transport Than It Will Ever Save!RECALL WEDNESDAY: Ford Is Looking For 655,000 F-150s For Brake IssuesAudi R8 V10 ConfirmedNext Pagani Zonda to be powered by supercharged V8 from McLaren SLRReaders Sound off: Doesn't mobile internet belong on your phone? BMW doesn't think so...When Is It Safe To Buy A New Or Redesigned Car Model? Chrysler kills plans for new Dodge Journey, will produce small car insteadM3 vs RS4- The Winner May Not Be The One You Want To OwnBMW European Delivery: Amazing Photos from GermanySpied: 2010 Mercedes E63 AMGWill The New X6 Really Damage BMW's Reputation?Leaked: Nissan 370 Z shows upRocky Mountain High Colorado! 001 Spies The 2009 VW Tiguan SUV