Agent001
Agent001
I like to go top shelf, where Mama hides the cookies
View My AgentSpace

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Tags: BMW, M5, 6-Speed

Tag Links: BMW, M5, 6-Speed

Is the 6-Speed manual in the new BMW M5 a REAL improvement?
And Richter is right: the M5 is slower and even clumsier with a conventional six-speed manual gearbox and a clutch pedal. But the six-speed M5 is also better to drive in almost every way. Read Article
Is the 6-Speed manual in the new BMW M5 a REAL improvement?



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]
matt635matt635 - 1/1/2007 2:46:36 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I'd rather take it as an SMG. Yes manual transmission is more 'fun' in theory, but the M5 was designed to be a precision tool for going very quick and offering a greater degree of practicality (at a more affordable price) than something like an F430. It was supposed to have SMG, not full-on stick shifting - the customer cropped up with a "we are always right" attitude, and guess what they weren't - BMW should have stuck to thier guns on this.

I guess an analogy for other people might be Audi Quattro... RWD is more fun than 4WD (in the same way a manual box is more fun than a semi-auto)... so should Audi offer the RS4 in RWD too - just to make it more fun - even though it wouldn't be as fast.....??

reply to this comment
mstangpny07mstangpny07 - 1/1/2007 3:28:18 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I would also take the SMG. Sure the stick is more fun, but the SMG makes it a daily driver (city) that's also fast(er).

Did BMW design the manual transmission at the last moment, or did they anticipate the need and designed it with the SMG?

reply to this comment
matt635matt635 - 1/1/2007 4:56:29 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
it was a bit of an afterthought. The M5 was never originally expected to be offered with a MT


G35LoverG35Lover - 1/2/2007 9:48:22 AM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
If you are looking for a daily driver I would suggest the 530i, not an M5.
If I am going to pay 90K for a vehicle I should have the option of an manual.



mstangpny07mstangpny07 - 1/2/2007 10:47:22 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It's MORE of a daily driver is what I meant to say


Boss8canBoss8can - 1/1/2007 3:35:48 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
they took it from the previous gen m5


reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 1/1/2007 4:12:17 PMView My AgentSpace
-7 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I wouldn't take either of them.

The SMG may be more practical, but basically, it sucks to drive.

The manual may be more fun- and it's great to drive, but it sucks as a daily driver.

So basically, I think the new M5 is a dud. I hate saying that, though. I love the bodykit, and the engine is a masterpiece.

But I'm going to have to go with the E63 AMG, as a practical automatic that is also blindingly quick and luxurious, until the new RS6 comes out.

reply to this comment
autoartautoart - 1/1/2007 6:12:13 PM
+8 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
if you have to drive automatic then the m5 doesn't want YOU


SupraNeverBackSupraNeverBack - 1/1/2007 4:57:19 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
What? "...BMW took away the ability to fully disable the stability control system." So much for "Ultimate Driving Machine". :)



reply to this comment
AE86AE86 - 1/1/2007 8:43:19 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I can't believe BMW would put out any car that would not let you fully disable the stability control/traction control system. An M car should always be able to switch off the black box. I am not sure that Automobile has its facts straight.


BWagBWag - 1/2/2007 2:38:29 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
^
I have the new Car and Driver; the M5 lost to the S6 and E63 due mainly to this fault on BMW's part. But, because it is a computer, I am sure that someone can figure a way to disable the DSC without the help of BMW engineers.

-BMW


NARunnerNARunner - 1/1/2007 10:31:42 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Before bringing the M5 MT to market, BMW should have spent some time refining the manual gearbox, rather than taking it directly from the previous gen. They did it too hastily and I think it cost them a little bit.

I agree with what Matt said above, the M5 (and its illustrious V10) is a precision vehicle. It demands the best in terms of tranmission as well as powerplant. The 6MT just doesn't cut it. Same with the F430...the 6sp just doesn't cut it with these kinds of engines. The new "manumatic" transmissions have gotten better at shifting than a human ever could, so its no surprise that C&D got slower 0-60, 0-100, and 1/4mi times.

In terms of my preference, I love all of them, but I drove the E55 and loved it, so I would probably take the E63 over the competition...but the M5 would be close behind.

The S6, unfortunately, does not compete (nor was it meant to) so it should not have been considered in the comparo in the latest C&D. Although, despite being underpowered, it did manage to beat out the M5, so I guess hats off to Audi.

reply to this comment
DarkOneForceDarkOneForce - 1/2/2007 12:13:16 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Because F1 engines don't use automatics.


webguywebguy - 1/1/2007 11:12:22 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Well yes. Of course it is.
The desire for a manual isn’t a rational one. That’s why rational arguments such as "you never have to take your hands off the wheel, better gas mileage, even faster, etc." don’t hold any water. Any one who’s driven and enjoyed a manual for any length of time has developed an extra "limb" of sorts that operates autonomously... kind of like having an automatic hardwired to your brain. Ever seen (or been :-) ) a "manual driver" in an automatic car? They’re pressing invisible pedals, trying to move shifter that won’t move, they forget to put it in Park... it’s a sad sight. It’s clear there’s a missing "limb."

A traditional manual is more involving and (therefore) more fun to drive than any automated system will ever be; so it doesn’t matter that SMG is logically better. Manual should always be an option on a car priding itself on being a driving machine.


reply to this comment
minimalistminimalist - 1/2/2007 2:45:42 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
^ one of the most enthusiast driven not to mention well written posts ive seen here... ever! hat tip to you.

hey, have u guys ever heard about the e39 m5 that did under 13 in stock form? gosh! the e39 m5 truly was a milestone!


reply to this comment
weaponXweaponX - 1/2/2007 9:00:32 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Bottom line is the M5 is all about performance, and the 6-spd manual is a step back.

I’m very surprised that BMW would go for the quick band-aid fix and just bolt on the transmission from the previous M5.


reply to this comment
mstangpny07mstangpny07 - 1/2/2007 9:35:32 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I wouldn't buy the E63 mainly because if I'm buying a fast expensive car like that, I would want perfect safety. Remember the poor marks the E-Class got? (It's also an older, dated, design, but it sure is fast).

reply to this comment
autoartautoart - 1/3/2007 5:10:18 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
not to mention I find the benz AMG's to just be torque rockets, with little agility and handling, only brute straight line force.


lizthevwlizthevw - 1/2/2007 10:38:17 AM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I just don't get people who would order the SMG. If the point of this car isn't to have fun, what is it? Sure, you can go .3 seconds or whatever faster with the SMG, but I actually like driving, and without a real manual gearbox, frankly, your not driving. SMG is marketed as the best, but the reality is that it, and the flappy paddle gearboxes like those found in Ferrari's and others, are designed to sell automatics to people who have never learned to heel toe. Those with the SMG are missing out.

As for daily driving, I drive a manual in Toronto, which has some of the continents heaviest traffic, without any difficulty.

reply to this comment
mstangpny07mstangpny07 - 1/2/2007 10:48:12 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
but isn't it annoying at sometimes when you just want to get somewhere?


DarkOneForceDarkOneForce - 1/2/2007 12:12:30 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The SMG isn't just 0.3 seconds faster...

--------------------------------------
From C&D:

M5 SMG
0-60 in 4.2 sec
0-100 in 9.4 sec
0-150 in 20.7 sec
1/4mile 12.5@118

M5 Manual
0-60 in 4.7 sec
0-100 in 10.3 sec
0-150 in 23.4 sec
1/4mile 13.0@114

-------------------------

The worst part is the top gear 50 to 70 mph in 7.4 seconds vs. 3.2 sec Es3 and 3.7 S6 .

By contrast the MB B klasse 200 Turbo (with 193 hp) needs just 7.3 seconds from 50 to 70 in top gear.


Webguy said that these engines M5 and F430 don't like manuals, true because they are F1 inspired engines and F1 engines don't use manuals.

And BTW sequentials and/or dual-clutches aren't automatics like some think.


matt635matt635 - 1/2/2007 1:36:02 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I'm glad somebody bought up heel & toeing. One of the things I do like about auto's is the ease with which you can left foot brake, which I do all the time if I'm driving my old 6, whereas with the 320 I have manual, but hardly ever heel & toe, cos I'm simply not good enough to, and I severly dount more than 1% of the driving population could heel and toe at all.

Left Foot braking is easy, takes about a week to get right, heel and toeing depends FAR more on the design and layout of the pedals as to whether its possible or not. The easiest car I've had for heel and toeing was one of the crappiest cars I've ever owned (a Rover!)


RupertRupert - 1/2/2007 4:15:27 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
darkoneforcei hate to burst your bubble, but that 50-70 can't compare. the automatics will downshift, the manual won't. so they can't really compare.


AmazingBimmerAmazingBimmer - 1/2/2007 11:48:15 AM
-4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
no audi ever beat a BMW. the only reason this happened in the car mag you talk about was becasue of their hatred for idrive. Ive said this before.. anyone with half a brain (this does not include audi owners)can figure this out in 30 mins.. except these morons. I have smg M5. It is quite simply one of the greatest cars ever made and one that audi with all their fwd trickery cannot come close to.

reply to this comment
mini22mini22 - 1/2/2007 2:07:39 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Audi does not yet make a car that has the handling adjustability of a Beemer. With their current front heavy AWD layout it is a physical impossibilty. The RS4 is about 1/2 way there but that is as close as Audi has ever gotten. With the up coming shortened drivetrain allowing them to push the engine further back will definately help. It will be interesting to see how the handling changes on the new A4 that's coming out next year. The other point is that Audi's philosophy about how a car handles is simply been different then BMW's. Audi has chosen to value the safety of AWD without adjustable handling as in say a WRX or and EVO deliberately. I don't think you will see the same kind of oversteering fun from a BMW ever in an Audi.

reply to this comment
phantom330phantom330 - 1/2/2007 3:42:06 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
how many people here have actually DRIVEN a SMG M5 to make an informed decision? I love manual transmission cars as well, but SMG gives you total control of the engine and is quite thrilling to drive. With that being said, if you have driven both than that is your preference, but don't come to conclusions if the closest you have ever gotten to an M5 is the auto show.

reply to this comment
vdivvdiv - 1/6/2007 2:59:26 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
How does an SMG give you a total control of the drive train if you don't have control over the clutch? What about the sequential part? I believe the Ultimate Driving Machine should give the driver total control when required, and that includes fully disabling the computer DSC nanny. If you can't handle a stick-shift with all that power, maybe you shouldn't drive that car. I think the stick-shift is a must-have option.


M53RM53R - 1/3/2007 11:37:48 AMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I agree with MDalle 100%. The SMG may not be as fun, but its surely better overall. Not to mention its faster. U people probably havent driven the M5...
You also described the E AMG exactly what it is!! A saloon with a big engine and its comfortable.

SMG all the way! lol

reply to this comment
DarkOneForceDarkOneForce - 1/3/2007 6:39:30 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
MDalle great post.

Hope one day people will realise that sequentials and automatics aren't the same thing.

reply to this comment
SteveSteve - 1/4/2007 11:37:22 AM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
BMW now offers the manual transmission in response to the SMG being problematic, and because their SMG provides a ride that has been called "rubbish" by reviewers.

BMW does a lot of things right. They also do some things wrong. Some of them VERY wrong. "Launch Control" was a feature that was VERY wrong, as it tended to trash the drive train if used exactly as directed.

reply to this comment
caffeinetripcaffeinetrip - 1/4/2007 2:21:37 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
My friend used to have a 6spd manual 330i, and now drives a SMG M3.

He wishes he got a manual. End of story.

On paper and initially the SMG is great, but the only people that actually prefer the SMG in the long run are people that have never owned a manual transmission car.

reply to this comment
mpwrmpwr - 1/6/2007 10:46:20 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It seems to me that this highlights a couple of issues that may be disturbing trends.

1. According to car and driver the biggest reason the performance on the manual takes a hit is because the crash control systems (DSC) can’t be completely turned off like they can on the SMG version. Thus not allowing real driving like you would think this car was made for especially in a manual version of the car. But apparently this is a liability issue. What that has to do with a car that has 500 BHP is baffling.

2. BMW had to throw in the old version of the manual tranny. That seems an impossibility given the power boost over the previous generation, but I haven’t heard if this was modified in any way. Sounds like a lot of time, development and cost goes into the new systems, while the manual gets the scraps left over.

Both of these points hint at disturbing trends, shame on you BMW. How can you be the ultimate driving machine with such a compromise?


reply to this comment
To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Finding It Hard To Find The Time To Wash The Car? How About Waterless!How Low Can It Go? Industry Forecast For August Is Down Over 14%RECALL FRIDAY: GM Recalls 857,000 SUV For Faulty Wiper SystemsSinister Mercedes C-Class by KichererLotus Clark Type 25 Elise SC Limited Edition available for the mainland EuropeanDid Toyota Fall Victim To The Lure Of Money With The Tundra?Production Chevy Volt caught out in the open2009 Nissan R35 GT-R Nismo Tuning Packages2010 Lotus Europa i6 Concept DesignToyota will beat Volt to marketPirelli launches new Cyber tires with electronic monitoringHeated seats could ruin a man's chances of having kidsSpy Shots: Porshce Panamera with its rear door openAudi to get an electric version of the VW Up!Mazda working on Volt rival Is Toyota Tightening The Belt Too Much On Lexus?Up To The Challenge? Why Of Course! 2009 Hyundai Genesis ReviewHybrid Sales Rise, But Tax Breaks Motivate Some More Than Fuel SavingsBetter Fill Up Now - Gas Prices Back On The RiseRECALL THURSDAY: Hyundai Recalls 65,000 Elantras For Faulty Fuel PumpsToyota Now Cuts Global Outlook For 2009 By 7%Toyota Out Smarts The SMART Car With New iQMicrosoft bringing cheaper internet to carsBMW To Bring Four New Models To Paris Auto ShowBugatti offering more colors for the Fbg par HermèsChrome colored HAMANN Lamborghini Murciélago LP640 for saleSo You Think You Bought A Lemon? THIS Is Who You Call!Vw unveils Caddy Topos Sail Design ConceptHyundai Compares Themselves To Competitors After Genesis Scores 5 Star Crash ResultsIf The Keys For Both Of These Cars Were On The Table, Which Would You Pick Up?Lexus IS Convertible coming next year, lightweight IS-F in the worksSpy Shots of new Mercedes taken by yours truly!Teach An New Dog Old Tricks? Lexus Debuts The quattro Inspired LS460 AWD In MoscowForget A Sub-Compact If Want To Save Real Money Just Buy a Gas Hog!Chrysler Considers Selling The Viper As A Brand!Audi Offers Race Ready R8's To The PublicBMW's M6 Gets Put On Notice- Audi's 570 HP RS5 Caught On US SoilMcLaren working on family of supercars for 2009Revealed: Splinter wooden supercarGM releases GTR-style multi-function displayFiat Portofino concept re-creates 1960s beach carsNext-generation Mazda MX-5 will be more dramaticIf Lexus Isn't NERVOUS, It Should BE!Why Is BMW Backing Away From Performance? The M3 CSL Bites The Dust!Is It On Your Short List? Hyundai Counts On Fallout From Lexus, BMW, And Others For Genesis SalesDetroits Three Muscle Cars Hang Out: Camaro, Challenger and MustangProduction Buick Riviera cancelledCadillac version of the Volt hybrid in the worksAutomakers Expect Yet Another Dismal Sales Month For AugustBeen Waiting For Your First Look At The Official 2009 BMW Order Guides? We Got Em!