Mitsubishi working on a 400-hp Lancer Evo X

are you freaking kidding me?! i mean when these things were in the 30k range...yeh it was ok. But 70k+ for a mitsubishi?!? i have plenty of reasons to go buy a slightly used m3,m5, slightly used m6, c63 amg...the list can go on. Why the hell would someone in their sane mind pay 70 grand for this boggles my mind. Wait, they can always use it in another fast and the furious movie right? haha

— umik (View Profile)

Posted on 10/15/2008 6:42:39 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

i correct myself, i can get some of the cars mentioned cars above brand new for less than 70k at a bunch of dealerships i know.

— umik (View Profile)

Posted on 10/15/2008 6:44:08 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Never did I think that it couldn't get any better, at least not for the reasons you're implying.

— nsmatt (View Profile)

Posted on 10/15/2008 6:50:31 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

This would make a great winter car. This would make spectacular fun on the snow and maybe dirt.

— Htay7500 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/15/2008 7:35:53 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

that maybe Htay7500, and i've driven an 07 evo IX MR a bunch of times before...these cars are for a different type of crowd...like you said, it'll make a good fun on the snow/dirt car. You know these cars were originally rally cars..and honestly in my opinion, that makes em impractical for daily driving. So if your buying it for just the track, and or racing fast and the furious wannabe's (no offense) lol, then yeh then its a good car. Cause when i feel like cruising down highway 59, i dont wanna hear a loud exhaust blaring out loud the whole ride.

— umik (View Profile)

Posted on 10/15/2008 7:49:50 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

All these super-/turbo-charging really confuses me with the whole idea of power.

Turbo drag has already been demonstrated on one of the FQ Evo on Top Gear, and that's no good...unfair advertising, don't you guys think so?

— WorldofLuxury (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 1:05:58 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Mitsubishi definitely have the racing heritage to back it up but dawn $80k, that is a lot of money. I think I will get a lexus IS-F, M3, Audi RS4, or the new Cadillac CTS-V.

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 1:12:21 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Isn't FQ360 manufacture claim of 0-60 was 3.7 seconds? and magaiznes got even better numbers, better than Gallardo, F430. I think it even raced murceilago in some magazine.

So FQ400 will only be better, much much faster than C63, M3..etc, AWD and much more exclusive. can't wait to see.

JUGNU

— JUGNU (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 5:44:09 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

Maybe for that price they'll also throw in one of their TVs.

— StarSearch (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 9:20:41 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

So at what point are they going to make cars that are functional. The Galant is a POS, nobody is buying the Eclipse, and there SUV market is dwindling. But yet they continue to pump money into the Lancer?? How about they build some other cars in their lineup to actually help make money.

— Whelan (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 10:47:13 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

EVO X needs 400 hp on the base version. With the BMW 135i running circles around it and econoboxes like Cobalt SS matching Evo's performance for a lot less money there is not much left for Mitsubishi to do(if they want to stay in business)other than increase the power of the weak Evo X while decreasing the selling price. In the current state the Evo is a joke.

— Star (View Profile)

Posted on 10/16/2008 1:31:04 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2   

Cobalt SS matching the Evo X...Ouch

for the hell of it Chevy sould build a 400hp Cobalt for $50k just to slap the evo in the face

not that im hatin' on the Evo or anything

— Cornholio852 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/22/2008 8:14:36 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1