Nissan GT-R produces 475HP at all 4 wheels

The Nissan GT-R is an awesome car. Everyone is going to buy one of these.

— bmwfan1513 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/14/2007 8:56:28 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

Very nice car.

— spiceace (View Profile)

Posted on 12/14/2007 9:05:48 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

There once was the Snake and the Mongoose.

This car is the Mongrel!

— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/14/2007 9:44:33 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1   

This car has performance that is world-class.

0-60 in a Nissan estimated 3.5 seconds and it can lap the Ring in a 7:40ish or whatever.

We haven't had official tests done, but something tells me this car will outrun the 911 Turbo to 60 mph. Yes, I believe the Nissan GT-R will be able to produce a time better than 3.2 to 60 mph and it will lap the Nurburgring in better than 7:38, which is the official time of the Porsche 911 Turbo.

— GermanNut (View Profile)

Posted on 12/14/2007 10:32:55 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

this car is mad. but i think it just came too late. how many years did they spend to develop this car?? and when they just released this GT-R, the 911 turbo's face lift is coming up.

but its very impress that this car out handles the 911 turbo.

— dayday (View Profile)

Posted on 12/14/2007 11:46:40 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

S4, this one is for you, the Nissan GT-R will make the Audi R8 look like a VW Passat. Stop denying the fact that Nissan will run from 0-60 in less than 3.5s.

Who care if the 911 turbo's face life is coming out, the Nissan GT-R V-Spec is coming out a year after the base model. Rumor has it that the GT-R V-Spec will be much lighter and will have up to 550+ hp to go against the LF-A and NSX.

You can be number forever, sooner or later someone will beat you. Just to remind everyone here, the original Nissan GT-R was the first sportcar to crack under 8 min mark at the Famous German track.

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 12:07:49 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

correction, you can't be number #1 forever, someone will eventually catch up to you. And than they will surpass you.

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 1:04:21 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -3   

I suggest that everyone learns how to read, the dyno chart posted clearly states 482 PS at the FLYWHEEL! Which means that the original poster at http://www.nagtroc.com/forums/R35-Dyno-t20782.html , the article at Motor Authority, the person who posted this article, and everyone who read this all missed that little fact.

Now the GT-R will be a great car, certainly the only thing in its class (4 seats and the performance it offers at its price) but claiming the numbers shown at the wheels instead of the flywheel makes many people feel there is to much fanboyism going on. That said I wonder if/when I will get to see one run in person.

— 91z4me (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 1:07:40 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

91z4me is correct.

If you look at the image of the graphs carefully (http://carview-img01.bmcdn.jp/carlife/images/UserDiary/7132676/P1.jpg), it does say "Fly Wheel Torque Graph" and "Fly Wheel Power Graph"

Nice observational skills, I wouldn't have noticed (nor bothered to look) if you hadn't already.

— tiradan (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 1:28:49 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

91z4me is correct.

If you look at the image of the graphs carefully (http://carview-img01.bmcdn.jp/carlife/images/UserDiary/7132676/P1.jpg), it does say "Fly Wheel Torque Graph" and "Fly Wheel Power Graph"

Nice observational skills, I wouldn't have noticed (nor bothered to look) if you hadn't already.

— tiradan (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 1:28:50 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

The Audi R8 is definitely is a true performance car, and an instantly classic. But if you need a V10 to beat an a Nissan V6 twin-turbo, than it is nothing special.

I still think the Audi R8 is an amazing car and would love to own one. But as for performance wise, it can't touch Godzilla, at least for now.

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 2:13:25 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

The Proto looks better than the real one!

— SpeedfreakJoe (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 2:23:26 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

I would like to see the car in more tests . The dyno numbers combined with its 3800 weight make that 7.38 seem like a one time event with a hand picked car.

I am not selling my 997tt but I might consider replacing one of my other two cars with a GTR if it really is that incredible . I have doubts.

Even at 3100 lbs and 505Hp the stock Z06 sounds faster than this 475Hp and 3800 lb car .

The Porsche has 480 but with sport chrono it bumps to 520 Hp weighing 3494 lbs .

One other thing -- There is a lot more power even in the current Porsche . I feel that the manufacturer held back the Hp but with the GTR coming out and V10 Audi I can understand why.

— yrralis1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 2:48:51 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

Totally agree with Sailor.

The GT-R is in a different class! Althought it tries to enter the up-market. all previous skyline GTRs were cheap tuner cars with big turbo's and no luxury.

this new r35 doesn't know what it want to be

— SevorbeupstryIsBack (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 8:00:48 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

It looks terrible, but the performance and maybe the price will keep the chavs happy...

— Jag_xfr (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 6:27:20 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

agents.... what happened to the article I submitted about the 09 subaru forester???

— Htay7500 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 8:10:44 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

475 to the wheels is amazing with only 10 or 11 psi on the VR38. And the DSG tranny takes some of the drivetrain losses out, but with the rear mounted transmission and the AWD system parasitic losses I would imagine to be closer to 20%!

— germeezy2 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 9:26:54 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

If both the 911 and the GT-R have about the same power the Porsche should be able to outrun it in a straight line and top speed, because of its lighter weight and no AWD the GT-R also has a long driveshaft running from the front engine which also adds to more power loss. The lighter rear engine RWD Porsche 911 turbo has a much lower power loss and on high speed tracks it should be faster then the GT-R. On the other hand the handling and 0-60 should be better in the AWD GT-R.

— 1000rrRider (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 11:04:17 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

If both cars have about the same power the GT-R will have a much greater power loss then the 911 it’s also significantly heavier then the 911. I'm not sure which one is more dreg coefficient but the 911 should do better at higher speeds then the GT-R. The traction of AWD in the GT-R gives it a better 0-60 and better handling on slower and windier tracks where it should prevail.

— 1000rrRider (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 2:43:18 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

Read in this web posting from someone who attended the recent Tokyo Auto Show (http://www.2010nissangtr.com) that the 2010 GTR will do 0 to 60 in 3.3, at an amazing MSRP for such performance. Can anyone else confirm? The photo there is pretty darn beautiful, too!

— Carman56 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 3:59:39 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

I don't care about what german and american car fanboys have to say, but this car is starting to look like the benchmark in the segment. It is not the fastest, 997 is faster in the straights, but in overall performance - handling, quality feel, handleable pricepoint, and tremendous power- this car will even trump the R8. This car looks set to become the most important car of the last 5 to 6 years. And guess what, even if i had the money, i would not be able to buy one, because there are guys waiting willing to pay 10 to 15 grand more than MSRP to get a hold of this car. I will take this car any day over a Z06, which is a very compromised car built only for the track, and by the looks of it, the godzilla is even better than the 997, and finally the R8, it even trumps the Audi because of the very manageable price, compared to the six figure price of the R8. This is an automotive breakthrough, trust me on this, this will force the other companies to improve their cars for the next generation, and this is why it is a revolutionary car, this will show the auto companies that big performance can be delivered in a manageable price point, and that is why i call it the most important car of the decade.

— farabira1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/15/2007 9:41:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0   

S4cabriofoxone, i respect your opinion, and i guess that if you are willing to put down 100 grand, then you will probably look at cars around that price margin, not something that is less expensive, for example if i could afford a Audi A4, i would not be looking at a toyota camry. But think of it this way, compare the Lexus 600H and the Lexus 460, the hybrid brother costs over 20 grand more than the petrol sibling, and suppose that i can afford both, will i be buying the LS600 for sure, well probably not, because even though the hybrid is more expensive, and way more prestigious(earning several review accolades) i still have a good chance of buying the LS460, because performance and quality of material wise, the cars are very similar, so why would i pay 20 grand more. The thing is with my first comparison of A4 and a camry, they are no comparable, because they don't have anything in similarity, but with the case of GTR and 997 and i dare say even the R8, all are very similar cars, take it or not they actually are. All are very well made(and S4Cabriofoxone GTR interior is not lacking in quality it was made to look retro to have similarity to older GTRs, and besides look at Porsche interiors they are as bland as the ones found in the GTR, well the R8 is a different matter altogether, but all cars are very well made, read any review of the GTR and you will find conviction in my claim), all of them provide super performance and handling(and how do you know that R8 handles better than the GTR, have they been tested together yet?, now your claims are making you look like a fanboy, i suppose!) and offcourse they are very user friendly and easy to use. And offcourse all of them are loaded with the latest of chasis construction materials and the latest of drive train technologies and off course in car gadgets (i don't have enough space otherwise i would have listed those technologies in a list). See that is why it is natural to compare all three, because all of them give you pretty much very similar offerings, and that is why i have compared all three, and i just happen to find the GTR as the best of the bunch, just as you have the other choice the R8, and i guess choosing one from three similar offerings is not illogical for a human brain. And to "TheSailor", you said that "the R8 is cool, and the GTR is just isn't", well i am sorry to disappoint you but many will take the GTR to be cooler(me included) and you will find many views that any one person have may not be shared by others, so please don't make such outrageous claim.

— farabira1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/16/2007 8:43:29 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

This is going to be my restoration project in 2020

— montyz81 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/16/2007 9:36:43 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Check out the price of this Nissan GT-R in Japan .I guess dealers in USA are going to be marking up the price once it lands here

paste the link and scroll down to the GT-R section its going for 14 000 000 yen thats about US$123 000

http://www.cineaction.co.jp/japanese_used_cars/stk/stk_list.cgi?mk=NISSAN

— raschitakochangwenya (View Profile)

Posted on 12/16/2007 11:39:06 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

It seems like all these cars will be coming out at about the same time, as 2009 models (NSX, Lexus LF-A/LF-C, GT-R, Supra). 2008/2009 should be an interesting year.

— LexusLion (View Profile)

Posted on 12/17/2007 1:21:38 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Some may love the GT-R look, some try to like it and some hate it. It is a awesome deal price vs. performance. Personally im trying to like it. But few things still bothers me. First the absence of a manual transmission is a turn off, second the size..i love them wide but the height of it bothers me and lastly the placement of the engine for me, fails to qualify as a exotic....i wish it did.
Until you own and experience fully what Porsche engineering is about, some cant understand the love for the beast. I enjoy mine. The presence of the
GT-R doesnt change it but held me back in ordering my Turbo. Porsche will not have a issue deliverying something to overcome GTR stock vs stock. Dont get me wrong GTR will have potential with aftermarket stuff..
German engineering vs. JP Tuner loving....
Ill probably get my hands on the GTR after all is said but you better believe a 09 Turbo sitting in the garage as well. My question then is to all the GTR lovers, if you given a choice between both cars to own for 5 years (free)....still a GTR over a 997 Turbo?

— Motorhead (View Profile)

Posted on 12/17/2007 2:51:32 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

The two cars aren't comparable, the Porsche has intangibles that place its worth above the GTR. And I doubt that the Nissan dealers will sell these cars for MSRP. And for $20k over, I doubt I will consider one.

— germeezy2 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/22/2007 5:40:50 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1