27 Votes

Porsche posts $28,247 average profit per car

david999 submitted on 12/4/2008 Official Bell & Ross Timestamp: 11:00:13 AM

57 user comments | Category: Spy News | Source: | SOURCE: car-reviews.automobile.com

A study by B&D Forecast released in German newspaper Welt am Sonntagearlier this week revealed that Porsche, one of the most prestigious names in the automotive industry, is by far the most profitable automaker on a vehicle by vehicle basis.

Porsche makes an unheard of €21,799 profit on each car it sells! This isn't to say that Porsche is making €21,799 ($28,247 USD) straight up on every vehicle it makes, but rather that it earns variable profits, with some more (Cayenne Turbo S) and some less (Boxster). To see just how badly Porsche blows other automakers out of the water

Read Article

About the Author

The Truth Hurts!
— david999 (View Profile)

User Comments

Although this is an older article, it still is an interesting read in this time of doom and gloom for automakers.
— david999 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 11:25:48 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

So not only do you criticize Porsche owners of being badgewhore's you admit you are one yourself. You didn't have to write out a whole story of your life and how you need a car to get women. It doesn't matter what car you drive it's how you present yourself but being cheap won't get you any. You're making assumptions of how people are but you should worry about your own self confidence first. Don't be quick to judge because everyone has their own reasons why they own a certain car. My lady and I have been together for 7 years and I went from driving a Civic > G35 > down to a Maxima > LS, S, and R8 so she's been through the thick and thin of my career so that's proof she wasn't all about the car I drive.

Like I said before in other threads. Bargain shoppers won't be shopping for any prestigious brand. Bang for buck value doesn't make someone a car enthusiast. Car enthusiasts in my opinion are people who love all cars, get what they can afford, and make the best with what they have. The on going excuses of "Why get a ______ when you can get ______ for half the price?" doesn't justify anything. Even though I am fortunate enough to have what I have I don't dislike any cars that are much cheaper.

Just don't respond anymore. I haven't seen major deboosting like this in 6-12 months before you even came on the site. Don't end up like Michael "Troll" Taylor unless you are him :P.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:20:15 PM | | Votes: 7

Haha ops I click on the wrong "reply to this comment". This is not for you david but it's for Badgewhore.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:21:42 PM | | Votes: 1

When you build the same car (911) for the past 30 years, it's not surprising. Porsche doesn't want to give the boxster and cayman more horsepower, so they don't hurt the 911 sales, which the 911 is a cash cow. For old money the 911 might be alright, for others Porsche is pretty boring.
— Lecsucks (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 12:11:44 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -23

Then you don't appreciate what motoring is all about. Porsche's aren't your typical cars that change drastically every generation. It takes a benchmark and refines it throughout the years.

They have boosted more horsepower for the new revised Cayman as well as the Boxster. The Boxster has had a horrible image for itself and it deserves much more as it's a great car to drive and handles very well. The Cayman S is unbelievable, nice and solid to drive with more rigidity. The 911, well it can speak for itself.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 2:12:07 PM | | Votes: 13

I do like the GT-R but it doesn't mean I will go out and purchase one. I am perfectly happy with my 2008 R8 and is plenty fast for my liking. The price I paid for my R8 I could have easily picked up a 911 Turbo but thought that the R8 would be a nice choice. I have driven a GT-R down in Arizona and I enjoyed it but like I said I don't have to own one to respect it. I've seen a handful of GT-R's around town and at least 3/5 are driven by chumps who don't know how to drive. It's a shame because that car deserves much better. Then again the car doesn't require the know-how of driving a manual car to enjoy it. I've seen a few car enthusiasts at the local track where 911's, R8's, Lamborghini's, Ferrari's and 1 or 2 GT-R's show up and we all have a fun chat about seeing cars like 1989 Accord's being sooped up with bodykits and wheels along with large wings. If the GT-R owner is joking about Japanese wannabee tuners it must mean it's ok right? LOL.

Anyways
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 6:02:37 PM | | Votes: 11

I am tired of the argument that the 911 is so great. The car is plain ugly. Even Clarkson call it a squashed beetle. Agent 63, you even contradict yourself about appreciating what motoring is about. The reason why you bought a R8 over a 911 is because the R8 is sexy, the 911 is not. Beside the Cayman is a better balanced car than the 911. Come out with a Cayman turbo and the 911 is history.
— Lecsucks (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 6:51:22 PM | | Votes: -16

"sooo your saying that refining a car over generations justifies a 23k markup??? ha! ok..."

Absolutely. Drive the first 911 and then drive the 997. Tell me it's not worth the price difference.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:47:14 PM | | Votes: 12

Agent63 got beat by a modified 1989 accord and has to console Ferrari and Lambo owners to feel good about what he lacked.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:11:34 AM | | Votes: -16

Badgewhore,

I am a very humble person but I have to be arrogant for the first time. You're just jealous you can't afford one. LOL.

And no I didn't lose to an old beater. Quit trying to start sh!T, it won't leave this site anyways you're wasting your time.

You think the CGT isn't desirable? you know damn well you want one of them. You're rants about people being badgewhores can only go so far.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:47:18 AM | | Votes: 13

I never said the 911's weren't nice. They are good cars. Finance status of their company speaks for itself.

Anyways all you Japanese fans are defending what you guys think are right. Fair enough and obviously we have disagreements which is fine. It's just a site and it's just opinions. End of the day it's all gravy. I ain't backing down from my statements but no point because this is a never-ending debate. That's why AutoSpies has become so popular. People come back for this :)
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:50:52 AM | | Votes: 13

Quit arguing Porsche haters. read what this guy had to say because its very true. just stfu and accept it b!tches.

" quizz - 12/4/2008 8:04:57 PM

You guys who are criticizing Porsche for its "price" do not get it. It's like saying "Why pay extra for Prada when you can get something similar at the GAP"

People who buy a Porsche 911 don't do it because it's a good "deal" - they buy a Porsche because they've dreamed of owning a Porsche, owning a piece of racing history, the unique "feel" of driving a 911, the balance of a rear engined flat-six. It's all about the intangibles, not about "bang for the buck". If you want that, you can soup up a 370Z.

Porsche owners LOVE the marque beyond its abilities as a sports car. You are either a Porsche fan or you're not, but to attempt to argue based on objective numbers is pointless. People who go into a Porsche dealership aren't interested in getting the best race car for their money - they simply want to own a car they've dreamed about for a long time.

And this applies to other brands as well: Ferrari, Mercedes, Rolex, Rolls, etc. "
— Lexurious (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:54:43 AM | | Votes: 12

ima die-hard gt-r and import fan but what lexurious quoted is true....
— GTR1 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:56:42 AM | | Votes: 8

Basically what "Lexurious" is saying is that die hard Porsche fans are nothing more than die hard Badgewhores, but they are a different breed, they're dumber. If this was about Ferrari, then they'd have more credibility. Ferraris are sexy, they sound even better, looks like what it cost, has way more prestige than any Porsche, comes standard with super high quality leather lining just about every part of the hugh dash, even real carbon fibers are used, better balanced, better handling, better tactile feedback, intangibles that you'd never have to defend. Best part is, they never depreciates. It's a win win win situations.

With the exception of the Carrera GT, none of the above applies to all other Porsches. 911 sounds like crap, looks like a turtle and makes owner look like an unhip old fart. If you disagree with that last part, just think how much cooler you'd look in a Ferrari, see?

To be so defensive about a flawed unbalanced design, a dorky shape, nasty unrefine sounding engine can only mean that one was train to be dumb because those individuals likes to be a follower and just mindlessly follow the herd, it's part of the human genes to want to be a follower because nature didn't intend for all of us to be alpha males.

When I first saw a 911, I thought it's the ugliest thing ever. Then they tell me how expensive it was, I thought they were nuts. Then as I do more reading about 911s, and through educations and my own alphamaleness observation, I grew to better understand the real world around me. It's all western marketing propagandas.

Bombard the mass with slogans like "Porsche, there is no substitute" or "BMW, the Ultimate driving machine" or "Lexus, the relentless pursuit of perfection", or "Ford, quality is job #1" and eventually the follower types will learn to accept that as truth and go out of their ways to defend those marketing hypes with all their might.

It's not about Porsche racing heritage, most automakers who've been around more than 50yrs also have rich racing histories. Plus, production vehicles shares practically no parts with race cars, it's not practical or economical.

Great performance is great performance no matter who makes it, isn't the point of going fast and handling good for less money what performance enthusiasts strive for? Why over pay to go slower or no faster? Spending less and beating the guy who spent more is much more fulfilling. It's easy to beat on those who have less.

All those self proclaim performance enthusiasts who says the Porsche killing GT-R and ZR1 Vette are cheap crap are nothing more than self denying Badgewhores.

For me, I confess I'm a Badgewhore because it gets me what I want from the brainwashed brand concious female herd. It's like fishing, chicks don't bite if you don't drive the right bait. But for my money, I wouldn't waste it on a Porsche, I'll go much cheaper and get almost as much prestige from a BMW to serve my badgewhore needs and when I'm financially re
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 2:39:35 PM | | Votes: -9

Agent63

"And no I didn't lose to an old beater. Quit trying to start sh!T,"

Don't be a hypocrite, You started sh!t when you added the part where you and your homeboys were dumping on the accord owners. You didn't have to add that in, it had nothing to do with whatever you were trying to say before that. You were hoping to get laughs and supportive remarks from all the rice haters here. But as Rice haters know, there's a price to be paid for being arrogant and when the table is turned and you become the one that gets dumped on, it don't feel good. Show respect and you get respect, you never see folks in old modified beaters saying rich guys are making up for what they lack with expensive cars.

People who modified beaters are as much enthusiasts as we are, just because their taste in styling don't flow with ours don't mean they deserve to get dump on.

"am a very humble person but I have to be arrogant for the first time. You're just jealous you can't afford one. LOL."

I'm not jealous at all, I do very well myself. If you're rich and arrogant, you'll be viewed as an idiot and won't make much friend with anyone except those who wants to be like you or fancies your car. While they might respect you for your car and wealth, they don't really like you. Seeing that you are asian, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are doing well financially, however, your choice of hanging here on autospies and arguing with trolls kind of throws a wrench in your credibility as a wise decision maker.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:07:15 PM | | Votes: -8

LOL You're obviously bias because you may own a G37. It's a totally different price range for a Porsche and a G37 and as for the GT-R it's the price of a full spec & optioned out Cayman S (Here in Canada). The GT-R is a respectable performer but in terms of quality and prestige it's a Nissan. The GT-R may not be cooler because it's a personal choice of style but it's definitely a great car no doubt about it!

Hell, I'll take a Porsche 911, GT-R, and a G37 to be a daily driver lol.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 2:17:12 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 13

"The GT-R is a respectable performer."

GT-R beats just about any exotics and/or supercars out there in any conditions for only 70K and only gets a "respectable performer". How many care can make that claim? Bias would be an understatement.

"but in terms of quality and prestige it's a Nissan"

Have you seen 911 and Boxster interiors? Door panels look thin like 80s corollas, only with slightly higher grade and thicker plastics used. Porsche leather look and feel like cheap vinyl. There isn't much quality different between what Porsche offers than what KIA offers. Only difference is Porsche charges 15k if you want leather in your 911. This explains why they make so much money per vehicles.

Only reason Porsche has any prestige is they're heavily over priced. But that's true of any makers of luxury vehicles. Any expensive automobile, watches, clothings, etc. automatically commands prestige. That's the way things are in the free market system. NSX is a perfect example, everyone knows the owner paid alot for it because it cost alot at 90K, yet the rest of the acura lineup has no prestige because it's priced for poor people.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 3:34:59 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -15

@Badgewhore

<<Have you seen 911 and Boxster interiors? Door panels look thin like 80s corollas, only with slightly higher grade and thicker plastics used. Porsche leather look and feel like cheap vinyl. There isn't much quality different between what Porsche offers than what KIA offers. Only difference is Porsche charges 15k if you want leather in your 911.>>

Yeah... we all know how sour the grapes are when they are too high in the vine and can't get them.

Go buy the Kia you talk about and forget Porsche.
— bimmer (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 12:39:04 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

Of course I've been inside a 911 and Boxster, how else would I be able to tell you the truth? You probably know a sour grape first hand too, how else can we explain why you actually know what you're talking about.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 2:19:49 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

@Badgewhore

Even now you don't get it... Let me explain... The grapes are not sour. YOU say are sour, just because you can't reach them.

YOU are a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment -> Moron
— bimmer (View Profile)

Posted on 12/12/2008 11:44:01 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

I have to agree with Chuck, although I don't think the G37 is quite there yet.

Okay, 911, GT-R, or Tesla... which would you pick?

I'm going for the Tesla.
— SanJoseDriver (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 12:50:29 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

911
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 1:11:01 PM | | Votes: 8

I will never understand the appeal of the Tesla. A sports / performance car should make NOISE!
— sizquik (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 1:39:31 PM | | Votes: -2

I would rather have a base Porsche Carrera than a GT-R. I wouldn't want a car that fast, for one thing. For another the 911 is drop dead gorgeous this year. The interior is far nicer, the engine sounds far better, it gets surprisingly good mileage, and it doesn't need advanced AWD to have perfect handling.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:49:46 PM | | Votes: 6

That is why I have never purchased a new Porsche!
— hk4site (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 2:34:37 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -6

this solves the question: why the hell doesn't my 120k Porsche outperform a 80K Nissan.
from a pure engineering point of view, the GTR has 80k dumped into engineering, while you would be lucky to have 30% of what you pay for a Porsche goes under its hood.

— ghosthunter (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 2:51:46 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -7

accept that Porsche also does not spend half of the money on electrical components and computer assistance to help drive, and with what little is left, use buttons and materials from a altima/maxima grade.
— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 3:49:53 PM | | Votes: 2

what i meant to imply was that you get a much better deal, i mean MUCH BETTER deal from a GTR than any Porsche if you see it from a engineering point of view.
Porsche makes 30k per vehicle while each GTR bring no money, if not debt, to Nissan. the 80k you pay for the GTR all goes under the hood, the 120k you pay for the Porsche, 30k goes to the company, 20k or so goes to the dealer, 40k or so goes to options. whatever is left goes under the hood.

can you imagine how much would Porsche charge you if they stick their badge on to a GTR? no less than 160k.

— ghosthunter (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 5:49:52 PM | | Votes: -1

"For old money the 911 might be alright, for others Porsche is pretty boring."

http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/8558/boringporschegb2.jpg
— TurboSpyder (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 3:01:21 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Stupid study. The huge profit that Porsche had that year came from VW stock gaining in value. It had nothing to do with how much their earn per car. Even Porsche said that this study was completely bogus.
— chewy (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 5:04:46 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

i was waiting for the truth to rear its head at some point.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:42:28 PM | | Votes: 0

Wait about 3 years for a Porsche 911 + GT series as the depreciation is immense with this car. The car loses I think about 1/4 of its value in that time.
— veyron1001 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 6:12:48 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

It gets even stranger when you think of the 987...here you have a coupe (Cayman) which actually more expensive than the convertible (Boxster) version. They are expert marketers, most people, even car people don't realize it is literally the same car.
— t_bone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 7:48:10 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Especially now that they have identical engines. The Boxster is STILL cheaper.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:51:31 PM | | Votes: 1

Yes, although it's funny for next year they have detuned both Boxster versions by 10hp to "fix" this problem. It will be funny to see how it was accomplished, with a pinched intake snorkle or something.
— t_bone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 1:41:40 AM | | Votes: 1

You guys who are criticizing Porsche for its "price" do not get it. It's like saying "Why pay extra for Prada when you can get something similar at the GAP"

People who buy a Porsche 911 don't do it because it's a good "deal" - they buy a Porsche because they've dreamed of owning a Porsche, owning a piece of racing history, the unique "feel" of driving a 911, the balance of a rear engined flat-six. It's all about the intangibles, not about "bang for the buck". If you want that, you can soup up a 370Z.

Porsche owners LOVE the marque beyond its abilities as a sports car. You are either a Porsche fan or you're not, but to attempt to argue based on objective numbers is pointless. People who go into a Porsche dealership aren't interested in getting the best race car for their money - they simply want to own a car they've dreamed about for a long time.

And this applies to other brands as well: Ferrari, Mercedes, Rolex, Rolls, etc.
— quizz (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 8:04:57 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 15

You hit the nail on the head. If you want a 911, you buy a 911.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:52:10 PM | | Votes: 7

more over Porsche put money into racing like no one does. any sports car racing they are there. if u like them buy it if not go buy VW or Toyota
— pchera01 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 8:58:13 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

one more thing, couple of months ago, before i pick up my 2009 GL450, i went a Porsche dealer to test drive a Caynne S, I find out that it doesn't have blue tooth, it starts only on 2009 models, i was shocked
— pchera01 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/4/2008 9:00:34 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Porsche needs to get down on it's knee and thank all the BADGEWHORES for willing to pay this much markup. But being the snob that it is, that'll never happen.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 12:30:25 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -15

I don't know if you ever have driven a Porsche for any extended time or ever will, but I can tell you what is special about the car. The car just works so well - the combination of handling, acceleration, steering, braking etc is just so seamless that it really makes you feel as you are the brain of a powerful machine that you control almost by thought. I've owned many Porsches over the years and they just keep making them better. My '09 C2S is a really remarkable Porsche. About being a badge whore - part of the reason I love my car so much is it is pretty darn anonymous where I live. Nobody gives it a second glance. Though I could afford a Ferrari or Lambo, I'd be too embarrassed to be seen in one.
— pcar4evr (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 6:24:06 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

Porsche makes so much on these cars because they can. They have earned a badge name. That is why you have cars that are cheaper and perform as well as their counterparts. But because of their heritage and prestige, they have sorta earned the right to charge their prices. Although you could go out and get an older 911 or Boxster for somewhere in the 20's.

I never was a fan of Porsche, not that I would turn one down, but there drivers remind me of the type of people who are my age and get high end BMWs. They spend all their time at the desk in the office or at the gym, or on weekends with Heineken in hand. Think My New Haircut guy.

But that is my perception.
— Whelan (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 9:20:56 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

wish I had hair
— pcar4evr (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 9:36:20 AM | | Votes: 1

So all you people who are deboosting me are saying you wouldn't want a Porsche for half the price? You're all totally happy with how much they over charge their vehicles? You wouldn't take a 35K Porsche Cayman S over a similarly priced Nissan 370Z because it no longer has any prestige due a 50% MSRP? Tell us, I'd very much like to know.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/5/2008 12:32:17 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -7

I'm still waiting for all you sore losers to say something smart. Even a monkey can hit the deboost button.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 1:33:46 AM | | Votes: -1

On second thought, forget it, all these crazy deboosting are masterminded by one person, Agent63.

He's either over riding the single boost limit that most of us are allowed or called all his sore loser Porsche friends to sign up just to deboost those who don't say nice things about Porsche. Just look at his posts, practically every one of them(no matter how ghetto) gets major league positive boosts while every post I and those whose views disagrees with his matches the negative boost of EL34, star, Agent001 and agent009.

No agent has ever posted anything worthy of more than 3 positive boost. How is it that only agent63's positive boost are almost 5times higher than the rest of the agents? As I've said above, Agent63 is trying to make up for what he lacked. Someone must've abused and traumatize you back in your Ricer days agent63 to cause you to do this.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 2:10:47 AM | | Votes: -1

Badgewhore, I don't know how old you are but didn't your mom teach you that whining only makes you look weak?

Keep the paper route going, stay in school and maybe someday you'll be able to afford a fine car. And if not, you can always put a fart can exhaust on your clapped out Civic
— pcar4evr (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 7:21:34 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

It's ok don't need to talk to Badgewhore. This thread is now old news it's time to move on to a new story. Let him whine as he tries to analyze how on earth he got deboosted so he turns to being naive and thinks I did it all, very funny to say the least. I've had my laughter for the day.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 12:33:43 PM | | Votes: 3

Agent63

Stop jerking pcar4er's little horn, he might get the idea that what he said was actually smart and may apply to compete in the special Olympics.
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/7/2008 1:53:08 AM | | Votes: -2

LOL and what were you doing above responding to Bimmer's comment? Just stop responding to this and move onto another thread. It's getting old and seems like you're still wanting this to go further, dumb.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/7/2008 4:03:11 PM | | Votes: 3

And why are you still responding to my comments? You're the one who suggested moving on so you can avoid answering tough questions that make you sound hypocritical. You call it dumb and blame it on me all the while it's you who can't get enough and continues to post. You either got issues of your own you want to settle or just ain't smart enough to see the whole picture.

Face the truth, wether we go to another thread or not, your arrogance will continue to cause you to make dumb posts resulting in people getting on your case and it'll never end until you clean up your act. Until then, Autospies.com loves your flame baitin posts. This site is nothing without flame. So FLAME ON!!
— Badgewhore (View Profile)

Posted on 12/7/2008 10:18:31 PM | | Votes: -2

LOL Flame wars are awesome what are you talking about?

I don't have issues. I'm not the one who admits to be a badgewhore and only is one to get the ladies. I don't know about you but you need to get your act together and see the whole picture. I'm not going to discuss personal issues with you because I don't know you. Just analyze your own issues and deal with it.

FLAME ON! Hope you're not taking it too personal. Because it's all for fun anyways.
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/8/2008 3:34:57 AM | | Votes: 3

build exceptional product year after year for decades.

have a brand that stands for something always (in this case, performance and iconic style).

avoid making cookie cutter cars and provide unlimited options for customization.

treat your loyal customers well.

the result after decades: unbelievable profits.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 12/6/2008 8:06:34 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Add your Comments

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters): [img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent001.myautospies.com/images/sample.jpg[/img]

Email Me When Someone Replies To My Message

Porsche posts $28,247 average profit per car

About the Author

User Comments

Add your Comments

Submit an article

Photo Galleries

Cars

Autoshows

Latest Articles