42 Votes

Self-parking Lexus no match for our auto critic

IamEvilHomer submitted on 3/23/2007 Official Bell & Ross Timestamp: 5:45:55 PM

98 user comments | Category: New Cars | Source: | SOURCE: www.freep.com

Tag Link: Lexus

For now, at least, I am still the king of the asphalt jungle.

For years, automakers have promised that our cars would eventually drive themselves. They've added everything from radar and video cameras to skid-preventing brakes, power-closing doors, remote-opening tailgates and emergency overrides on steering in an attempt to make the driver irrelevant, if not obsolete.

Advertisement

Someday, maybe, but not today. I've taken on what may be the most technically advanced new car on the market and beaten it at its own game.

I out-parallel parked the 2007 Lexus LS 460 L. Repeatedly.

The loaded version that I drove costs $85,331.

It's a technological showpiece, with a climate-control system that monitors the passengers' body temperature and cruise

Read Article

Self-parking Lexus no match for our auto critic

About the Author

ask me
— IamEvilHomer (View Profile)

User Comments

this is the best quote "Lexus executives themselves
admit that they don't expect customers
to use the system, but they're proud of
it nonetheless."

if this dosen't prove lexus is all marketing and no substance nothing does
— IamEvilHomer (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 5:58:16 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 10

edit - can't park your own car
— jmrA480 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 9:05:36 PM | | Votes: -16

This is why we see Lexus fails to capture the hearts of international customers. They can see right through the marketing! How else could a Toyota derived knockoff be perceived so highly in the US and have ZERO image abroad? Marketing.

How could a brand like Audi, a company who consistently DELIVERS in terms of luxury, driving dynamics, and quality yet doesn't market be perceived so highly internationally but devoid of a solid image in the US? Lack of marketing.

Americans = sheep who are easily manipulated via marketing. If they say it can compete with the boys, it can! 10 years from now, you'll hear these same Americans talk about Hyundai being as prestigious as MB.
— AUDIMAN4 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 6:44:59 PM | | Votes: -10

Audiboy,

Instead of constantly blaming Americans for Audi's marketing shortcomings, why don't you start blaming Audi? If it were true that Lexuses were just "Toyota-derived knock-offs" then your arguments might would begin to hold a little water. The problem(s) is(are) that Lexuses are not just rebadged Toyotas, Audi does not care about North American customers, and that Lexus was not expected to be an instant success the world over, but they are still doing quite good for themselves.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 8:34:59 PM | | Votes: 4

audiman needs an enema to relieve some of that bitter back pressure
— SenSpeed (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 10:32:18 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

They are proving that they make a vehicle that is capable of doing what other car companies say can not be done. It is a great car!
— david999 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 7:08:38 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

except it can't actually do what you need it to do.
the system only works if the spot is 6 FEET bigger than the car.
people might need help with tight spots not giant parking spots.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 8:20:57 PM | | Votes: -1

No david wrong, other car companies could do it if they tried, but they reaalize that it is useless, if you can park your own car you should not be driving a car. Take the bus!
— jmrA480 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 8:54:39 PM | | Votes: -5

david i agree with you Lexus can market a useless system and sell cars

BMW, MB or audi could not do that
— IamEvilHomer (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 3:19:19 AM | | Votes: -5

Let's not forget that the Toyota Prius was already parking itself in Japan in 2003...
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 6:48:18 PM | | Votes: 6

Self parking is a good idea for those that have head injuries and are unable to turn their heads to know if they're about to ram the Lexus into the car in back.

Enjoy your day,

el34
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 7:26:24 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

This is the best comment, You have to have a head injury to buy a Lexus...now its all beginning to make sense...
— markusck (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 10:02:13 PM | | Votes: -1

If you are agreeing with EL34, then you definately have a head injury.
— answer (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 3:44:47 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Of course it wont be considered magnificent until the next BMW 7-series can do it!

Lexus woke up and decided to play the game the Germans have been playing for years. And unlike the Euros who would swear up and down that their new self-parking system was "revolutionary" and "magical," they shamelessly admit what's what. The Germans would have use the development of their new technology to show their skills and that they have the best engineers. Lexus does as well. When this becomes available on a German car, do you think that brand is going to "admit" that it's useless.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 7:32:07 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

To me, it's a waste-of-time feature, whether it is offered by Lexus or BMW. What's next? A car that drives automatically into your garage when you get home?

If you can't even accomplish a simple task such as parallel parking, just go surrender your driver's license and take public transit for the rest of your life.
— TruenoAE86 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 8:36:15 PM | | Votes: 0

So Lexus wakes up (on the wrong side of the bed) and 'invents' a system for a perceived need to park a car, and their own execs admit the system is flawed...the Germans go out, find a need and come up with technology that responds to that need, no they still don't understand the game...they should stick to the marketing hoopla, that they do better than anyone..
— markusck (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 10:08:06 PM | | Votes: -11

Guaranteed when the 7-Series gets it the tunes will change. No question about that.
— Anthony (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 12:29:25 AM | | Votes: 2

Will, I've been agreeing with you lately.

This, however, is not one of those times.

"And unlike the Euros who would swear up and down that their new self-parking system was "revolutionary" and "magical," they shamelessly admit what's what."

Is it just me, or isn't Lexus marketing the eight-speed and self-park as "revolutionary" in every LS ad I see? Lexus would never put what they said in an advertisement; they still want the general public to believe this is a world-beating, super-useful feature. They don't have a high horse that they ride on above the German manufacturers. They're in it to make money.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 12:49:35 AM | | Votes: -3

I've seen no Lexus ad where they call any of those features "revolutionary" particularly. However I have seen new LS ads stating that the car is "Unprecedented" which is an accurate statement. No other cars in the class have an 8-Speed or self-parking.

" they still want the general public to believe this is a world-beating, super-useful feature. They don't have a high horse that they ride on above the German manufacturers."

Agree.
— Anthony (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 1:19:52 AM | | Votes: 6

My guess is you will NEVER EVER see a self parking feature like this in a Benz, Audi, BMW, or anyone else for that matter. There just is no need for it...Lexus has shown the only value of it is in the marketing and once you are the first to introduce a gizmo for marketing purposes it loses its cache...who wants to be known for copying a failed Lexus technology that is less than perfect and fails to respond to any actual need?
— markusck (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 8:58:56 AM | | Votes: 0

bmw wouldn't put such a system on the 7 unless it actually worked.
but i still wouldn't want it personally...too gimmicky.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:10:44 PM | | Votes: -7

This technology was designed for people who couldn't parallel park. Sure, it doesn't do as good of a job as a professional might, but it wasn't designed to be the best. It does what it set out to do, doesn't it? Even the self-driving Mercedes S-Class has a few glitches in it. It's called technology.
— lexusis350 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 7:36:53 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2

but, actually, it doesn't do what it's suppossed to do. let me know when you find a 24 foot parking spot in manhattan.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:13:31 PM | | Votes: -6

lexus is about parking.
let's get back to the driving!
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 8:22:10 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

Truer words have never been spoken.

Now if Lexus comes out with a self washing car then I'lll be impressed.

Of course they should work on those breaks and I would not want to be driving down a mountain without good stopping power.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 8:29:48 PM | | Votes: 2

awesome ,,so true
— jmrA480 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 9:20:49 PM | | Votes: -8

Self parking is fun- believe me.
— mitchatlexusofmarin (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 10:18:52 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

Fun..a gizmo...if you are going to spend research dollars on something, how about safety or performance or better yet, develop a design philosophy...why on a system nobody needs or really been crying for..oh i forgot, marketing marketing marketing....
— markusck (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 4:21:44 PM | | Votes: -2

Enthusiast,
And if they programmed the car to attempt to park with less than 6ft of extra room and it starts scuffing other cars, then everyone would say its a crappy system.

A much more innovative idea is to put battery chargers on the brakes and call it a hybrid. I believe that technology was put to use on bicycle nightlights about 20 years ago.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/23/2007 10:36:58 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 5

oh huu, you always miss the point.
why would anyone need help getting into a 24 foot spot? sad.

so to make yourself feel better you mock the M3.

the regenerative braking system in the M3 has a very clear purpose. using that power to recharge the battery leaves every ounce of horsepower for the fun part: driving. something that is, unfortunately, lost on lexus fanatics like yourself. why can't you just be an adult and accept that different cars excel in different areas?
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:18:56 PM | | Votes: -6

The reviews of the Lexus parking system are typically trivial at best. Simply find a big enough space for this big car, and it will park. The system does not defy virtual space as many critics seem to expect it to do.
— Anthony (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 12:32:14 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

not looking for the car to defy any laws of physics. but people sometimes need help getting into a tight spot. technology might be helpful in those cases. this technology, however, doesn't meet a need. therefore, it's a gimmick.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 7:50:46 PM | | Votes: 0

i've made an revolutionary discovery, Lexus made the self park system so that the driver that hates the Lexus so much, can get out faster and won't jump out of the car driving in its magical 8th gear.
— EvoAudi (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 1:26:31 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -3

Only the typical insecure German worshiper would make that comment.
— Anthony (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 2:19:07 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

ii have a German S6 and the backup and parking system is much more usefull then the 460 system

all show and no go
— IamEvilHomer (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 3:17:59 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -4

It doesn't use the camera, and it works fine in the rain- not sure where you heard otherwise.
— mitchatlexusofmarin (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 12:11:12 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

The point of the self-parking is to prove that the technology works as advertised.
Why are people here so defensive about some feature on a car that others might find useful? If only other car makers could match the quality and reliability of Lexus, we would all benefit as consumers.
— david999 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 9:08:48 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

But people, isn't this the point of technology? As primarily German fans responding to this topic, I would have thought most of you would appreciate advancement in technology. How many times has the ABS warning light flashed on your dashboard? I see more use in a self-parking system than I do in ABS. And do you think the first S-Class ABS system was perfect?

I disagree that no other auto manufacturer will use self-parking. BMW has already used it on a 5er wagon prototype I saw in a video. The whole point of technology in the luxury car segment is to make the experience as laid-back and as effortless as possible. When one manufacturer introduces a new wave technology feature that could use some work, it is other manufacturers' job to find out what works and refine the system. Looking forward to BMW and Mercedes' self-parking systems. (The ones that actually guide the car, not just grid read-out ones, which Lexus already had.)
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 12:05:26 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2

I don't smoke, but the cigarette lighter has gotten more use than my airbags, but that was not the ultimate point I was trying to make. By the way, the self-parking system allows you to "avoid objects" while parking.

Mercedes has this NightView Assist feature that is supposed to let you see objects further off into the distance at during night driving. Even though Cadillac already had this type of system, the Mercedes system, while improved, is still not as useful as it could be. I know of a Fifth Gear review of the S-Class and I'm sure many more to back that up. Let's also not forget the fiasco the S-Class's Distronic Plus had with that tunnel crash! ;) Those two systems from Mercedes were marketed as important safety features, moreso than the self-parking system. Neither one of those systems were as harshly criticized as the self-parking feature on the LS.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 1:51:25 PM | | Votes: 2

I've driven a car without ABS. My first car was one of the very first cars to come equipped with ABS. The system stopped working after a while, but did get fixed. ABS keeps your tires from spinning when you slam on the brakes in emergency stops. I'm a pretty slow driver, and can't even remember the last time I had to make an emergency stop. Same goes for traction control. ABS and TRAC lights flash in your car whenever they're in use. All I'm saying is that neither one has flashed in my car yet.

"Between the appaling brakes of the LS and your inabbility to park AND avoid children at the same time ..."

This statement is what's appalling. The brakes on the LS are not of dire concern. The LS brakes fine. And who said the system doesn't stop when an object gets in the way? Newsflash: it does.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 4:13:10 PM | | Votes: 3

You don't understand what ABS does, you say "ABS keeps your tires from SPINNING when you slam on the brakes in emergency stops" No thats not what ABS does. ABS prevents the wheels from LOCKING while braking. The purpose of this is to allow the driver to maintain steering control under heavy braking and, in most situations, to shorten braking distances.

The fact that you have not had the need YET, says nothing. The one time you wished you had them could very well be the one time they save your life. Now find me an instance when the same is true for...self parking...or some other amazing Lexus technology...I think the issue here is most people don't understand these seamless safety systems and feel they are useless as they can't see something happen like a neat self parking gizom...something very easy to understand..
— markusck (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 8:14:15 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -2

will. did you know that BMW has a brake system called CBC ( Cornering Brake control )? I know that Lexus never would have thought about a system that is developed to aid in braking through a cornering. Then lexus would have to develope an actual sports car. Cornering Brake Control is actually a better safety feature than ABS by itself. I am going to explain this system to the lexus impaired people on here ...

Cornering stabilization employs wheel speed sensors, steering angel sensor ( measures the steering angle ), lateral angle sensor ( measure how hard the vehicle is turning ), yaw sensor ( measure cars rotation ), brake sensor ( measures the amount of pressure being applied ).... By monitoring the sensors the car has the ability to detect any of the deviation from the path of the car when cornering and gently apply brakes to the individual wheel to keep the car on the intended path. This allows the driver in an emergency situation when they swerve to avoid and obstacle at speed to maintain control without having to use the steering to over compensate. Try that on a lexus and see what happens ...
— BMW4me4ever (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 3:00:10 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

the last time i checked the ABS light comes on when there is a problem with the system...not when it actually comes on.
— DallasMR2 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/27/2007 2:03:27 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

Too many buttons to push and too many measurements to make to park a car.

Besides, anyone spending 80k will most likly know how to park a car, but a car with warning sensors that can be bypassed is an excellent idea
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 1:58:54 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

this is a great technology for those who are disabled and/or handicap.

if you are too lazy to parrallel park, then get a chauffeur or take public transportaion.
— WeAreMad (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 2:58:43 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Self parking is an amazing piece of technology that epitomizes the supremacy of Lexus in the Automotive world. In one fell blow to the Germans, Japanense engineers have constructed a superlative marvel of engineered steel that can not only park, maasage and make small talk withs its driver and passengers but can simultaneouly deliver a crisp sport ride all in the hushed silence of a newborn's sigh ..

Scortched with the above .. BMW and Mercedes promptly release they legions of mindless hordes ..all suspicously name GoGo something .. to swamp the blogsphere with FUD. After all, releasing future and half baked technology has been their particular temple of expertise... even if their electronics were manufactured by blind gremlins with arthiritis...
— izfuney (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 3:55:00 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

"the supremacy of Lexus in the Automotive world"

i can hardly control my laughter.

again, lexus makes very high quality, reliable cars. they're also very quiet and comfortable. they keep their 50 and 60-something buyers who couldn't care less about driving very happy. however, they're not fun to drive, the ride is often too soft, and the styling so pedestrian that you can hardly pick one out in traffic.

do mercedes and bmw make perfect cars? no. but so many of them are great looking, fun to drive and deliver wonderful performance. and, surprise, those are apparently desirable features the world over. furthermore, both brands are able to charge solid premiums over their infiniti and lexus competitors. i wonder why?
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:27:01 PM | | Votes: -6

Gogo has been around here for ages. He was just banned four times. And as far as I recall he likes Peugeot or something (French cars).
— Willis (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:27:27 PM | | Votes: -5

You know, in the review of the LS460, the tester did note that the suspension offered a "crisper ride." Obviously you've never driven one, and maybe he hasn't either, so both of you are going off of what othershave said...

His second paragraph may have included great imagery and other insensitive remarks, but his underlying point about the Germans and their technology is the same one that I was trying to make earlier: the Germans have come up with a lot of other just as useless technological pieces without even half the criticism.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 5:33:28 PM | | Votes: 0

Then stop complaining about it! And everyone knows that Lexus is far more criticized than any other brand on this site, evidenced by things such as the "boosting" system, which I get the impression was specifically implicated to annoy me and make me feel bad... ;)
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 6:15:40 PM | | Votes: 1

Oh is that what it is? I just always thought all of you were just extremely cocky and egotistical. That's another problem that this site is victim to often. German fans simply cannot ignore comments they do not like. Do you know how many ignorant comments I just ignore They're not worth responding to! Most German fans feel otherwise apparently.
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 6:41:30 PM | | Votes: 2

Also, it's a shame that most cannot realize that half of the "Lexus maniacs" are pure mockeries of actual Lexus fans, just trying to annoy real ones. Guess that plan backfired, for the people they are annoying the most are...the German fans. lol!
— Will_ (View Profile)

Posted on 3/24/2007 6:44:02 PM | | Votes: 1

enthusiast,
If BMW alternators can't do the job and they need help from regenerative brakes, perhaps BMW should innovate and build themselves a better alternator. So what's the additional mileage you get from the regenerative braking opposed to the extra weight? It weighs probably 20lbs and you get 1 extra mile per tank?

My Jeeps battery is 4 years old and still runs like new, and it's had to startup in -25C temperatures regularly.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 11:10:16 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

again, you just don't get it.
read sailor's comment again huu.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 12:17:30 PM | | Votes: -2

Hey sailor,
The LS's standards brakes are equal to the S-classes brakes, I've already had several tests NOT done by C&D to prove it.

So I guess you're saying the S-class must have pretty lousy brakes too.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 11:14:41 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

But yeah, I think self parking is pointless. Germans are just jealous that it's getting more attention than they like.

As for regenerative braking, unless it's on a real hybrid, it's pointless too.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 11:15:48 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

why exactly is it pointless to provide maximum engine power to the driver?
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 12:19:05 PM | | Votes: -5

Why is it pointless? It's a cheap way to save fuel and reduce Co2 emissions...you really are ignorant.
— Rupert (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 12:42:13 PM | | Votes: -3

let's see how long it takes huu to log-in to his 7 accounts and de-boost me.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 7:52:48 PM | | Votes: -1

Sailor,
The Insight (10 years ago), 1st Prius and Civic all have regenerative braking. Welcome to the party BMW.

Unless BMW's alternator's are basically a POS like their cars, then why does the battery need help recharging? What next, the fans in the air vents will start recharging the battery too? This is just as pointless as bolting 500ft.lbs on a car chassis.

I see BMW marketing is still efficient as ever.

Rupert,
"Cheap" is so very fitting.

Anyone have any numbers on what this revolutionary technology does for a gas engine? We might as well just get rid of hybrids now that BMW has this new "hybrid" technology?
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/25/2007 10:36:52 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

"when a consumer is turned on, the system uses the battery instead of loading the engine!"

lol!!! ;)
— Zackary (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 7:22:10 AM | | Votes: 4

We're so used to the Germans coming out with the latest cool technology. I guess the world just can't handle when a Japanese brand joins the elite club. The LS is a nice car, not the "greatest," but a nice piece of machinery nonetheless.
— Zackary (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 1:22:08 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 5

a rational comment from someone. finally.
— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 10:19:32 AM | | Votes: -2

Why are so many people angry about Lexus developing something like the self park feature? If I had that car I would never use it but its just nice to have. Right now it might be too slow or impractical, but I'm sure it will become better in the future. "It's all just marketing" I don't think people are that dumb. They aren't going to rush out and buy that car just because it has that one feature! I've driven the LS460 and its a superb car, but I'd still rather have the A8L.
— AMV12 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 1:24:38 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

I have seen everyones posts on here and it appears that the self park is a waste or time and money. How many times in the real world is someone going to be able to find a spot that is 6ft longer than their car? I live in chicago and it would take me about a year if I had to rely on the fact of finding a space to park that was 6 ft longer than my car. The idea is cool but it is NOT Functional at all in today's society.
— BMW4me4ever (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 2:41:13 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

With my daily commute to and from work, I could make an argument that the cruise control feature on my car is useless.

You can't judge the merits of a feature just by looking at your own wants or needs.
— answer (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 3:56:22 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

lexusis350 - 3/23/2007 7:36:53 PM
Show Comment -3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
This technology was designed for people who couldn't parallel park. Sure, it doesn't do as good of a job as a professional might, but it wasn't designed to be the best. It does what it set out to do, doesn't it? Even the self-driving Mercedes S-Class has a few glitches in it. It's called technology.
---
Are you saying people who buy Lexus can't drive? LOL...ouch
— Agent63 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/26/2007 4:46:28 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

Sailor,
Hybrid regenerative braking has a point. BMW regenerative braking does the same thing as the 7-hydrogen, sell a feature that's pointless. My Jeep recharges its battery just fine, what's wrong with BMW that they need help?

POS and BMW have been synonymous long before you came along.

Don't know about BMW cars, but my alternator runs whenever my engine runs. Regenerative braking is uselss unless the wheels are turning. Where's the efficiency in that? LOL Maybe you should drive around with both the gas and brake applied to get maximum return on the regenerative braking? This idea sounds stupider the more you try to validate it.

Defend pointless ideas all you want, smart ppl see through BMW's scams. You can keep on trying though, it's a free country.

I know the next BMW innovation, dual regenerative braking to power the cigarette lighter.
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/27/2007 12:03:20 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Can BMW alternators recharge a car battery sufficiently or not? It doesn't get any simpler than that.

Also, show some proof that this retarded idea gets you more than 1 extra mile per tank.

Think you can handle this request thailor?
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/27/2007 5:02:26 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

TruenoAE86, this one's for you.
http://auto-presse.tv/technik.php?action=view&newsid=12880
Think about the size of Japanese garages.
— skidroad (View Profile)

Posted on 3/27/2007 9:11:32 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

An extra 16 miles on 1 tank (3% x 18.5g x 29mpg highway), and that's with a 525i. The GS450h has the same range with a smaller gas tank and can run with a 550i.

Why would I say they are lying? I've clearly stated it was a pointless idea.

Just so you know, the GS350 has the an equal sized tank and has the same range as the 525i, but the displacement is bigger and its faster, and on top of that its 300lbs heavier.

Here's a tip BMW, spend more time making better cars rather than stupid gimmicks.

Care to try again?
— huu76 (View Profile)

Posted on 3/28/2007 9:58:15 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Add your Comments

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters): [img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent001.myautospies.com/images/sample.jpg[/img]

Email Me When Someone Replies To My Message

Self-parking Lexus no match for our auto critic

About the Author

User Comments

Add your Comments

Submit an article

Photo Galleries

Cars

Autoshows

Latest Articles