60 Votes

The new Cadillac CTS-V is hot, but can it really compete against the M3, IS-F, RS4, etc.?

Agent001 submitted on 1/9/2008 Official Bell & Ross Timestamp: 11:22:29 AM

104 user comments | Category: Report Cards | Source: www.autospies.com

Tag Links: 2008 Detroit uto Show, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V, BMW M3, Lexus IS-F, Audi RS4

Photos and info on the new Cadillac CTS-V leaked earlier this week in advance of the 2008 Detroit Auto Show and from what we can see it looks quite impressive.

But when you throw a car out there like this, there really is only ONE question that needs to be answered.

And it's not- Is it good looking (it is)? or Is it powerful (it is).

The ONLY question the new CTS-V has to answer is- For the first time, Can it really compete with honor against the BMW M3, Lexus IS-F, Audi RS4, etc.?

Do you believe it will finally have the chops to be a world class competitor against the cream of the crop?

Let the world know your thoughts...

2008 Detroit Auto Show Photo Gallery

2008 San Diego Auto Show Photo Gallery

The new Cadillac CTS-V is hot, but can it really compete against the M3, IS-F, RS4, etc.?

About the Author

FWD Torque Steer. Absolute proof the Devil exists.
— Agent001 (View Profile)

User Comments

i think we are underestimating it's potential...i see this as an m5/rs6/e-amg fighter

my opinion is that this will be comparable with the vehicles i mentioned above)rs6/e-amg/m5) and ahead of the vehciles you've mentioned (m3/isf/rs4/c-amg)
— r15mohd (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:29:28 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 13

Agreed. The CTS-V leapfrogs that whole category and competes directly with the big boys.
— Autoegr525 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 12:52:58 PM | | Votes: 6

I'm with you. The cars in mention maybe in the same price range as the CTS-V but not the same physical category. For the size and power, under the hood, the CTS-V must be compared to the M5, E63, and the RS6. And if the CTS-V can come even close to these car, never mind beating them(which I hope it does) it will be the best luxury sports sedan, for you money, on the entire planet. And that alone will deserve a standing ovation. But right now this is all speculations, we have to wait, like children in December, for out comparison presents.
— KillBot (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:02:06 PM | | Votes: 8

I'm pretty sure with what GM has been churing out [malibu, g8, ect.] this car will be more than successful.
— pacotacolol (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:34:33 PM | | Votes: 3

Of course it (successfully) comptete's in a different size/performance class than those vehicles listed in the topic, but there are those who would argue to the contrary...

IN VAIN!
— DaHarder (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:36:10 PM | | Votes: 7

The simple answer is No.

its rubbish, its american, its too plain.
— MrGunFun (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:47:10 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: -28

I remember during WWII when it was the USA that had to pick up all our gear up and move it to North Africa, France and Italy to get rid of Hitler.

You Euros didn't stand a chance.

Of course we had to do the same for Asia to defeat the Imperial Japanese.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:51:03 AM | | Votes: -3

WOW EL34.... nice history lesson.haha..
— Hwany (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:57:27 AM | | Votes: 6

@EL34. If that is your reason for not liking certain automakers than why do you support the German 3 all the time and bash the Asians? We fought both of them. Now, you're bad mouthing both of them and praising American.
— RealitySmack (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 12:27:18 PM | | Votes: 6

We got rid of them afterwards, Sailor.
— M35MT (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 1:24:31 PM | | Votes: 2

TheSailor, if I recall the Soviets did not liberate a single country during WWII other than fight for the Soviet Union.

In fact, when the war was over they got half of Germany and turned it into a craphole, while West Germany whet on to total success.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:26:42 PM | | Votes: -1

i don't think Sailor was necessarily promoting Russia as much as taking a swipe at the misconception that America solely won ww2. you guys are taking his comments way too far.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:33:52 PM | | Votes: 1

1995e34, I'm just saying the Soviets lost 23 million people during WWII just fighting on their front lines and the USA lost 418,500 liberating countries all over the world.

The people of the world should get down and shine our shoes and buy our cars for what we did.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:07:54 PM | | Votes: -2

23 million is huge.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 6:01:14 PM | | Votes: 1

GoObama08, the Democrats during WWII decided to drop two atomic bombs and they killed 200 thousand people.

Did you know 20 million Chinese people died during WWII because of the Imperial Japanese?

And many of those Soviets died because of that free communist healthcare that didn't work.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 9:23:40 PM | | Votes: -1

GoObama08, America killed more than any country since WWII!

I guess you don't remember what happend after the Vietnam war and the Pol Pot Massacre in Cambodia.

How about that war the Soviets had with Afghanistan or the Iran vs. Iraq war.

Let us not forget Rwanda and Darfur.
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 9:30:32 PM | | Votes: -1

GoObama08, if we get free healthcare in the USA, where will all the rich Canadians go to get their healthcare?
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 10:02:52 PM | | Votes: -1

Another thing GoObama08, how about that Vladimir Putin, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez? They're all multi-billionaires!

Those are great "social" programs those countries have ;-)
— EL34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 10:05:56 PM | | Votes: -1

lol this car will just put IS-F to shame.
— Hwany (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:59:37 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 9

gm is on track to retake the global sales lead as well as have some of the most desirable vehicles world wide. NOBODY else is doing both.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:57:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

1995e34... they still ARE #1 on a global scale. Toyota only had it for about a quarter of 2007.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:32:31 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/toyota-hopes-for-top-worldwide-sales-again/
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 6:05:23 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Yeah I think this V will help out.
— no1listensanyway (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 10:38:04 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

For the price of RS4/M3/C63 amg, this car has a performance that could beat/even with RS6/M5/E63AMG.

For the first time, I really like how this car loooks inside and out. With that performance, this is another bargain!
— Hwany (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:58:52 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

Do the math. 550 bhp with the weight of this car, will have explosive acceleration. It probably will handle well too. Will beat the M5 and RS4 to 60 and 100 mph.
Unfortunately, the last generation CTS-V had some horrendous quality issues. I hope Cadillac fixes them this time around.
— BMW995 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 12:05:20 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 6

I'm sure they've addressed the quality issues, GM knows how much is banking on this car.
— SilverAero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:51:07 PM | | Votes: 0

Interior is great, power is great, but why why why did Cadillac do that to the front bumper? Now it looks just like the previous generation CTS. The exterior of the new CTS was one of its strongest features, why would you purposely make your more expensive new version look just like the old one?
— JRobUSC (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 12:13:56 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

are you serious?
— courtstone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 1:42:55 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 5

I dare you to logically justify that statement
— SilverAero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:07:27 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

LOL, nothing? How about 550hp CTS-V vs. only 420hp for the IS-F!
— mmmpowr (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:05:04 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

^^^LMAO!!
— RealitySmack (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:59:08 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

I bet GoObama08 is really Oprah!
— OBAMAtheIDIOT (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 8:14:07 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

Let's not forget that this car has something the others don't. MRC (Magnetic Ride Control), which gives handling abilities that are typically reserved for ultra luxo, exotics. Therefore we can expect handling to be quite adequate to compete or even beat these cars. And with the numbers it has up in the hp community, the M3, RS4, IS-F are all nice cars, but are under the 450hp mark. So that would put this in competition with the M5 and the like. Even though Caddy kinda created its own class with the CTS.
— Whelan (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 12:52:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Ferrari has MRC right?
— SilverAero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:10:43 PM | | Votes: 2

Sailor> No question Russia fought like tigers to protect their homeland they suffered great losses, but just one question Sailor, if America needed vital help anywhere in the world something tells me we could count on several of our friends in a flash and Russia would have to think about it, but if Russia needed our help we would be there in a NY sec, that is the difference?
— chuck717 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 1:03:12 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

I see the photo...but what the stats? The corvette's powerplant?
— M35MT (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 1:26:03 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

With respect to price, it will compete with the M3, RS4, and the IS-F(I'd say the C63, but I think that goes for around $85k).

With Respect to weight and performance, it will compete with the M5, E63, and RS6 Avant.

It pretty much competes across the board; there really isn't specific line-up that it goes against. But, as powerful as it will be, this beast is an absolute porker; it's gained 250lbs-350lbs from the previous CTS-V. Hopefully the magnetic suspension and wide tires will offset it's heftiness.
— Bmw8ter (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:31:56 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

Thinks it's still going to have a lb/hp advantage on every car available when it hits the street. Only real problem is it will mostly be added to the front of the car! The RS6 is the only car that might have a similar lb/hp number, but is also even MORE of a porker and probably even more front weighted!! The AWD on the RS6 might help it, but the CTS-V is going to have the MRC and launch management to help it. In the end I think the CTS will for sure have a less of a comfort to performance trade off than any of it's competition based mostly on being the only MRC extreme performance Lux sedan.
— jasaero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:01:16 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

"(I'd say the C63, but I think that goes for around $85k)."

Huh? The much larger, more powerful E63 AMG is $85K! The C63 probably won't be any more than $65,000! The C55 was under 60!
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:34:52 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

The C63AMG starts at $68k. Maybe $85k was a little high, but once they hit dealers, they'll probably be going for around $75k-$80k, with options already equipped.
— Bmw8ter (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:54:18 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

No way. It will probably come with about 2 options. I am stunned that it's $14,000 more than the C55 AMG... if that's true. Because that's not on the MBUSA website.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:10:32 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

This is how I came up with the figure(I actually went back and it was a little lower). I compared UK pounds to U.S. dollars. I reviewed previous AMG model pricing in the UK to the same model in the U.S. and averaged about a 25% difference between the 2 figures; it ranged from about 21% to 28%. I tacked 25% onto the UK pricing for the C63 of 51,300 pounds. That's $64,125.00.

Give or take, I'd say the C63 pricing in the U.S. will range from $64k-$68k. The % difference in the lesser models wasn't relative to the higher performance models. The methodology makes sense, but you'd have to spend a little more time than I did, researching.
— Bmw8ter (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 11:51:09 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

They should put 4 tailpipe.
— M_Coupe_MonacoBlue (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 1:57:50 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -3

what for? there's only 2 banks of cylinders.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:03:32 PM | | Votes: 1

wow....if that logic isn't flawed, SEVERELY.
— Bmw8ter (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 7:11:03 PM | | Votes: 0

Can't wait to see this on Top Gear, Clarkson will praise it the entire time, say how its miles better than the first one then in the end he'll trash it despite it all. Should be good tv
— SilverAero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:21:00 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Where do you see Top Gear? It used to be on Time Warner in San Diego. Loved it but can't find anymore.

Yes Ferrari 599 has MRC licensed from GM. I'm not sure if on other products.
— vonbeeler (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:51:22 PM | | Votes: 2

Does your cable/satellite operator carry the BBC America channel? That's where you can see Top Gear. Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares is pretty good too.
— pushrod27 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:01:11 PM | | Votes: 2

Yes I'm sure I've got BBC America. Will check it out.
Thanks a lot. I've been barely surviving with Motorweek magazine on Speed channnel. Doesn't come close to Top Gear Except I like Jessica Chotski.
Thanks
— vonbeeler (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:16:18 PM | | Votes: 2

I just watch them as they come up on youtube
— SilverAero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:46:25 PM | | Votes: 0

As R15 stated. The V is looking at the M5, E-AMG, RS6 and not what is mentioned above. Not a good comparison. Top Gear will tear it apart when everyone else will love it...lol.

It will pack the same power plant as the ZR1 but with a smaller Supercharger and a single brick intercooler. NICE for a Luxury sedan!
— Porschinator (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 2:38:02 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

i have a feeling clarkson will like this one.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 3:04:28 PM | | Votes: 0

holy shit this is insane

i suppose this is a M5/E63 competitor?
— SevorbeupstryIsBack (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:34:23 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

Well, since I am bored and have little to do, I calculated power-to-weight ratios as a sort of cursory analysis. These figures are for the manual transmission where available.

CTS-V (2009)
550 hp/4200 lbs = .13095 hp/lb => 7.6363 lb/hp
*Weight from leftlanenews

M3 (new body style)
420 hp/ 3700 lbs(est.)= .12353 hp/lb => 8.0952 lb/hp
*Weight from Autoweek

IS-F
416 hp/ 3780 lbs =.11005 hp/lb => 9.0865 lb/hp
Edmunds Inside Line Full Test

RS4 (2008)
420 hp/ 3957 lbs =.10614 hp/lb => 9.4214 lb/hp
*Audi USA website

C-AMG (2008)
450 hp/ 3800 lbs= .11053 hp/lb => 9.0476 lb/hp
*Motor Trend Review

For the heck of it:

M5 (2008)
500 hp/ 4012 lbs=.12462 hp/lb => 8.0240 lb/hp
*BMW website

E-AMG(2008)
507 hp/ 4035 lbs= .12565 hp/lb => 7.9586 lb/hp
*Mercedes website

So, yes given this information the CTS-V has the best power-to-weight ratio
— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:37:34 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Oh hell,

The M3 figure was for an outdated 3400 lb. figure from a year ago. The number is right, but the math is wrong. So it should be as follows:

M3 (new body style)
420 hp/ 3700 lbs(est.)= .11351 hp/lb => 8.8095 lb/hp
*Weight from Autoweek
— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 4:40:31 PM | | Votes: 1

The C63 AMG weighs more than 3800lbs. It also weighs more than the RS4... I clearly remember the C/D article comparing it, the M3 and the RS4, in which they were extremely surprised by its high weight:

"However, resorting to 55-percent-more engine displacement and 50-percent-more torque than the M3 to make the two-ton C63 outrun the BMW, which is lighter by 463 pounds, may indeed generate grins, but not admiration as an engineering marvel. How can the Benz weigh 220 more pounds than an Audi burdened by its heavy all-wheel drive?"

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/14279/2008-mercedes-benz-c63-amg.html
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:52:11 PM | | Votes: 0

All I know is that it came from here:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0709_2008_mercedes_benz_c63_amg/driving_dynamics.html
— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 6:01:42 PM | | Votes: 0

Uh...here:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/
112_0709_2008_mercedes_benz_c63_amg/driving_dynamics.html
— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 6:02:18 PM | | Votes: 0

The Car and Driver Comparison says 4034lbs

or .11155 hp/lb or 8.9644 lb/hp.
— cdoke (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 6:26:43 PM | | Votes: 0

It also says a different weight for the RS4--a lower one.

Could Audi's spec be wrong? I guess.
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:11:29 PM | | Votes: 0

Lets not forget also that the 550hp number and weight is an estimate and not SAE numbers or actual final config weight. It could be conservative or maybe not. If conservative things could be lighter and more powerful come april when they announce final numbers. My guess though is weight is close or a bit wishful and power is conservative as they don't want to look like they over promised. With the new SAE power spec you really can't say a power and then mess to get it. This I think has most being conservative if they haven't got final SAE cert on the power. I am guessing it will be between 555 and 565 final SAE numbers or something like that.
— jasaero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:42:16 PM | | Votes: 1

they're all overweight
— SevorbeupstryIsBack (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 11:07:21 AM | | Votes: 0

Impressive for GM, but it's supercharged!

Remember the M5 or M3 or just naturally aspirated (N/A) therefore, if we supercharged an M3 or M5, that cadi would be left in the dust.
I can easily see an M3 supercharged pushing 550 bhp or more.
A supercharged M5 could be pushing 650 easily, so lets compare apples to apples please!!

Nice effort GM, but the Germans still rule.

Second thought: Cadi does not have the prestige that Benz or BMW have, and that can't be designed or engineered in.... it is earned, and it will take GM decades or maybe never to get the same prestige....

3rd thought: Interior design has many parts I recognize from cheap GM cars like G6 or Malibu, they still have that bean counter mentality, if they are really serious, they should share parts (parts that are visible at least) with their bread and butter people movers for the masses....

my three very heavy cents, cheers!
— garrafa (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:09:35 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -4

Who the hell would supercharge a V10 car? If by chance you were able to fit one in there, the heat generated from the tight area, would destroy the engine.

Discplacement
— Bmw8ter (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:04:57 PM | | Votes: 2

They slap twin turbos on a V12, why not?
— kablaam (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 11:15:04 AM | | Votes: 2

i mean NOT share visible parts with cheaper GM models.... i.e. window switches, tahoe steering wheel! etc....
— garrafa (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:11:09 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

I noticed my 07 S600 shares visible parts with the new C class and even some Chrysler product. I'm impressed with what GM is doing. Especially in light of the crap they used to make. So much so I bought a Vette. Today I rented a Z06. I don't think anybody logically can discount that its a monster. I like the CTS especially with 550 blown or not. Hell my v-12 has twin turbos and its 510hp. And all the new BMW's are coming turbo.
— vonbeeler (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:56:19 PM | | Votes: 2

hey garrafa do you have an article regarding parts sharing with Cadillac CTS and Chevy Tahoe? Liek to see that. Show me links on the Cadi's sterring wheel pic and the Tahoe's steering wheels pic. I do not see a comparison. Please show us =)

Oh wait, you were just being lame...sorry never mind...
— Porschinator (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 8:38:04 PM | | Votes: 3

Great...raw meet for the hungry fanboys!
— Need4Speed (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:44:01 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

Great car!
— S4cabriofoxone (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 5:53:41 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2

Why is it, that when we start talking about cars, do we get into these racial debates? As apposed to looking at the vehicle in question "as is"? I like cars from all over the world because they're all different. They drive differently, feel differently but there's something to like about them. Yes, I have my favorites. But, I don't base them to where they're made. THAT'S JUST STUPID!!! Most of you would call yourselves "car enthusiasts", well start acting like it. And stop acting like a bunch of squabling children. Can't we stay focused and talk about the car in question without going out on tangents that have nothing to do with the vehicle in question. In short "ACTED LIKE YOU GOT SOME DAMN SENSE!!!"

Killbot out
— KillBot (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 6:43:02 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

this car is pretty sick for the price... and all... plus remember you cant get a 6 speed manual with a E63... this car is gunna be hella fun to drive mad in
— AMGC55 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 9:12:01 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

oh, we remember.
— 1995e34 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 10:52:44 PM | | Votes: 1

To those who are bashing this car, give the credit where it is due. Caddy and GM have delivered a very pleasant surprise with this new CTSV. As much as we would like to argue otherwise we really can't! So much for that M5 I was going to purchase. I will wait for this instead.
— keyzi747 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 9:13:21 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 4

I love how ppl compare the CTS to different classes when its convenient to them. When its a regular comparo its always compared to the C, G and 3. When it comes to the CTS-V, everyone compares it to the E63, M5 and whatever Audi makes in that class.
— no1listensanyway (View Profile)

Posted on 1/9/2008 10:47:34 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

It's all in the fact the car is priced a segment down from the size of car it's gunning for. I think eventually Cadillac will creep the price upto that of the 5 series and others as people realize car's like the 5, E, GS, M, and A/S/RS6 really have nothing on this car other than a higher price a few more available features. I think it will eventually match them feature for feature also. I actually wouldn't be surprise if Adaptive cruise and lane departure warning weren't added one or two models years from now.
— jasaero (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 6:55:17 AM | | Votes: 1

how does discussing a car spawn into a history of world wars?

Anywho, I hate to admit it but I actually kind of like the CTS-V. Can't say I would ever buy one, but I think it's a great effort by GM to bring something exciting into this segment.
— phantom330 (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 11:50:02 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1

nice car - I'd stick to cloning the C6's motor tho.
— OBAMAtheIDIOT (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 8:10:35 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: -1

.....but they need to keep the price REASONABLE!!!!
— OBAMAtheIDIOT (View Profile)

Posted on 1/10/2008 8:11:47 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

This thing is bad ass. It looks awesome and its powerful as hell. Wish I could afford one.
— FerrarisR4me (View Profile)

Posted on 1/12/2008 3:10:32 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 0

EL34, you really are an ignorant moron. If you can't post comments that address the article with out ignorant, off topic, insults toward other countries, you should keep your mouth shut.
— racedogs (View Profile)

Posted on 1/12/2008 2:13:49 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3

Add your Comments

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters): [img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent001.myautospies.com/images/sample.jpg[/img]

Email Me When Someone Replies To My Message

The new Cadillac CTS-V is hot, but can it really compete against the M3, IS-F, RS4, etc.?

About the Author

User Comments

Add your Comments

Submit an article

Photo Galleries

Cars

Autoshows

Latest Articles