Agent009
Agent009
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."
View My AgentSpace

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Toyota And Lexus Shut Out Of IIHS Top Safety Picks For 2007?
"Criteria to win TOP SAFETY PICK award are tough because they're intended to drive continued safety improvements such as high crash test ratings and rapid addition of ESC," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "Recognizing vehicles at the head of their class for safety helps consumers distinguish the best overall choices without having to sort through multiple results."

Initially only 13 cars, minivans, and SUVs qualified for the 2007 awards. As automakers introduce new models or make safety changes to existing ones, the Institute adds winners throughout the year. With the addition of the MDX, Taurus, and Sable, consumers now may choose among 18 cars, SUVs, and minivans that offer top-rated crash protection and ESC.

Automakers make changes to earn TOP SAFETY PICK award: The Taurus replaces the Five Hundred, which was introduced in the 2005 model year and earned TOP SAFETY PICK in 2006 but lost the designation for 2007 when the Institute, based on new research, tightened award criteria to include the availability of ESC. The Five Hundred didn't offer ESC, which is optional on the 2008 Taurus and Sable. These cars also include side airbags with head protection as standard equipment.

"We're pleased that manufacturers are making rapid vehicle changes to reflect the latest safety research," Lund says. "It's only relatively recently that research has shown the dramatic benefits of ESC in preventing crashes. In a competitive marketplace, automakers are moving quickly to make ESC at least available and increasingly standard on most new cars and SUVs."

Rear crash protection is another area of improvement. When the 2007 MDX was introduced, its seat/head restraints were rated marginal overall, the second lowest rating. The head restraints are attached to a lever arm that moves the restraint up and forward as an occupant's back pushes into the seatback during a rear-end crash. Honda engineers changed the design of the lever mechanism so the head restraint moves toward the head earlier in a crash. The Institute tested a seat/head restraint with the new design, and it improved to an overall rating of good. TOP SAFETY PICK award applies to MDXs with the new seat design built after May 2007.

How vehicles are evaluated: The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.

Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented SID-IIs dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact. Injury measures obtained from the two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and/or passenger in a similar real-world crash would sustain serious injury to various parts of the body. The movements and contacts of the dummies' heads during the test also are evaluated. Structural performance is based on measurements indicating the amount of B-pillar intrusion into the occupant compartment.

Rear crash protection is rated according to a two-step procedure. Starting points for the ratings are measurements of head restraint geometry — the height of a restraint and its horizontal distance behind the back of the head of an average-size man. Seat/head restraints with good or acceptable geometry are tested dynamically using a dummy that measures forces on the neck. This test simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph. Seats without good or acceptable geometry are rated poor overall because they cannot be positioned to protect many people.

IIHS Top Safety Picks For 2007

Large cars
Audi A6
2008 Ford Taurus with optional electronic stability control
2008 Mercury Sable with optional electronic stability control

Midsize cars
Audi A4
Saab 9-3
Subaru Legacy with optional electronic stability control

Minivans
Hyundai Entourage
Kia Sedona

Midsize SUVs
Acura MDX
Acura RDX
Ford Edge
Honda Pilot
Lincoln MKX
Mercedes M class
Subaru B9 Tribeca
Volvo XC90

Small SUVs
Honda CR-V

Toyota And Lexus Shut Out Of IIHS Top Safety Picks For 2007?



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]

mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 5/17/2007 1:11:23 PM
-9 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
How come your inflammatory title doesn't read "BMW Shut Out Of IIHS Top Safety Picks For 2007"? Lexus hater extrordinairre.


reply to this comment
LuxuriousLuxurious - 5/17/2007 1:20:25 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
True that..where are Infiniti and Nissan too..where's VW (unless you consider Audi a VW)..


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 1:22:16 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I could say that too about BMW. But the problem is Toyota and Lexus claim to be the leaders in the market. So shouldn't a leader also lead in the most critical aspect?

Maybe invest and extra billion or two of those extraordinary profits into survivability of their occupants so they can buy the product again.

There are legions of buyer that will buy Volvo strictly for the safety factor. But I can't think of a one that buys a Toyota or Lexus because of the safety aspect.

Is a core concern more for safety being overshadowed by a reliability phobia?



LuxuriousLuxurious - 5/17/2007 1:24:53 PM
+5 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Ageent009..
GM was the market leader for a long time before Toyota, although it was never leading any safety or reliability aspects..



Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 1:36:46 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Very true about GM and look where they are today.

They basically squandered their seemly insurmountable lead and never attempted to be a true leader by example.

You can't lead every category that probably is too difficult, but I feel, you do need to lead in key areas and safety is a key area.



Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 2:09:58 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
bimmermike- the reason why a BMW or VW may be safer may be due to the home market dynamic and mentality.

The German cars sold here are typically meant to be driven at much higher velocities overall in their home market, so the crash worthiness must be higher.

Lexus and Toyota core market models in the US are typically not designed with this in mind. So logically we can assume when you design for a crash at 65 mph your car probably will not fair as well against a car designed to crash well at 90mph.

Any thoughts? (I bet there will be)



S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/17/2007 3:03:59 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
But 009- why aren't all vehicles designed for 90mph crashes? That's the $1,000,000 question, and it would make the automotive world a whole lot safer...


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 3:49:50 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Who know, maybe because some makers value profits over survivability scores? uh oh did I actually say that?


mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 5/17/2007 6:51:29 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"Each brand must simply stand on its own merits and Lexus and Toyota certainly do just that. But safety, obviously is not high on that list because they have caught years of flak for it, and have made little progress in that area."

http://www.safecarguide.com/mak/lexus/idx.htm

009- I know you constantly say that your posts are 9/1 in favor of Lexus, but whenever I read a negative, inflammatory headline on A.S. I don't even need to look (although I do)at whom the poster is. It is ALWAYS posted by you. I rarely see a positive post from you and I simply don't agree with you self deceiving "non bias" statements which you broadly proclaim. Lexus does not have a recognized problem (except with you) and have not "caught years of flak" for any such thing. Your assertions, with the smug insinuance of accepted fact, are false and misleading. The above link is but one of many which are easily found by googling. And remember, it was A.S. themselves who broke to us that the new gen IS has one the award for the safest car in Europe, beating handily your beloved non Japanese makes.



mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 5/17/2007 6:53:24 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
has one the award should read ---has won the award. Sorry for my lousy proofreading.


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/17/2007 7:20:30 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
agree that there's no need for a negative title. it could have read: mercedes and audi are only luxury brands that make safety list.

but i'm sure they made it 'inflammatory' because lexus fans tell us over and over how lexus is better than every brand at every possible thing.



Agent-666Agent-666 - 5/17/2007 8:02:35 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
why don't you zip it? LexusIsGodBecauseI'mADealerAndCannotBeUnbiasedOFMarin

Surprisingly I don't see any nissans nor bmw, one mercedes made it to the list but i thought Volvo should have more than just one to make it to the list.

Hats off to those who made it on the list.




mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 5/17/2007 8:16:06 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Sorry agent evil 666 or whoever the heck you are... I have never made any assertions on any post that "Lexus is god" or any such crap. I don't sit here and expouse propaganda bullcrap about Lexus, and have never done so on any occasion, but conversely, I don't appreciate ignorant slugs slamming a really great brand. You will never hear and have never heard me saying these blanket "Lexus is best blah blah blah" statements, but I sometimes grow weary of ignorant and biased haters. I love most brands we discuss here, and never slam competitive makes for emotional effect.Lexus is not my favorite car company on several fronts, but I am as honest as I can be where necessary.


Agent-666Agent-666 - 5/18/2007 2:47:59 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
really? i've read so many of your posts to think otherwise.
You remind me of my old Merc dealer who though merc was god.



kpaxxkpaxx - 5/17/2007 1:13:04 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
As I have posted previously...Toyota and the Keiretsu business structure are all about profit. This is why safety is not a priority for Toyota. Where ever they can cut corners to increase their profits they'll do it. This is part of their business culture.

reply to this comment
mitchatlexusofmarinmitchatlexusofmarin - 5/17/2007 1:50:40 PM
-7 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Are you going to post this every couple of hours? It is completely untrue, and Lexus is a leader in safety.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/17/2007 3:05:27 PMView My AgentSpace
+5 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
mitch, Lexus has a ton of airbags, but airbags do not = safety by any measure. Volvo, Audi and Mercedes-Benz are more committed to truly safe cars than Lexus; you must see that not everything Lexus does is what they "lead" in.


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 3:51:13 PMView My AgentSpace
+7 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
mitch- Post any standardized test where a Lexus or Toyota led the pack in safety for multiple models.


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 1:24:50 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
BIAS?...not really...controversial for sure...

A leader needs to lead by example, and in this category the sales leader isn't even at the ballpark much less lining up for a home run in safety.


reply to this comment
SilverAeroSilverAero - 5/17/2007 1:29:17 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 1:54:46 PMView My AgentSpace
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I hold no favorites, I fully respect Lexus and post probably 10 to 1 pro for them. So my track record for them speak for itself.

The funny thing is that I have been called Pro-Lexus, Pro-Toyota, Pro-Hyundai etc for quite while. Then I post a negative article on any of them, and I get called the opposite by many of the same people. LOL

For the record I am a car fanatic with no true favorite or disliked brand. I have been around long enough, to understand the context that each maker shoots for. So to me a KIA is a great choice for their target as is a Lexus for it. The two were never meant to appeal to everyone and to assume so is foolish.

Each brand must simply stand on its own merits and Lexus and Toyota certainly do just that. But safety, obviously is not high on that list because they have caught years of flak for it, and have made little progress in that area. Basically a buyer can not assume that a highly reliable vehicle is safe in a crash, the IIHS has proven that time and time again.



reply to this comment
Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 2:14:37 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Probably because if I said "KIA" was shut out you wouldn't respond to the article because they are not a leader. So maybe because "Lexus/Toyota" was a better conversational fit?

Again Volvo is no longer a leader, and the same argument is applied to GM, (on the way out). If you want the true sales leader in 2008 and beyond you need to look no further than Toyota/Lexus. They are the standard in sales.



reply to this comment
Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 3:52:14 PMView My AgentSpace
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I prefer "topically controversial"

reply to this comment
answeranswer - 5/17/2007 1:35:10 PMView My AgentSpace
+8 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Are people really saying that because Toyota is a sales leader that they are claiming to be tops in safety? I have seen countless ads for Toyota and Lexus which mention safety features, but none has stated they are the safety leader of the marketplace.

Volvo on the other hand has for years bragged about being one of the safest carlines you can buy, yet only one of their models made the list.

It would be pretty crappy if Acura did not offer to retrofit the new headrest design into early MDX models, even if they had to charge a small labor fee to do so. It seems like a pretty big thing to miss out on just because you were an early adopter.


reply to this comment
SupraNeverBackSupraNeverBack - 5/17/2007 1:39:56 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think many car makers don't take seriously about IIHS's "Tape measure rear end crash test".

reply to this comment
Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 1:56:18 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
So share with us how would you do it, to be fair?


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 2:17:23 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Many thanks! ;)

reply to this comment
JAYQ0401JAYQ0401 - 5/17/2007 2:11:42 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Why is it the toyota/lexus fan club cry a domestic conspiracy when the tundra didn't excel in safety. Now the IIHS leaves toyota out of the mix and the fan club cries foul....even Toyota can't be everything for every test and everyone. Get over it.

reply to this comment
Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 2:16:42 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It does appear the scientific data failed to take into account the nameplate. And for some it seems that that name must be considered over scientific results.




S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/17/2007 3:08:12 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
LexusAdmirer, he already told you! In our language: TO START A FLAME WAR. He wanted this article to have traffic, and you know there's only one way to do it.


1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 5/17/2007 7:28:30 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
S4, knowing that anti-Toy/Lex posts (or at least headlines) are put up on Autospies for the sole pupose of inciting these kinds of flame wars, how can you get so upset when Lexus fans get bent out of shape, as we often do. And I'm not talking about the faux Lexus crazies out there. I'm talking about the real fans who appreciate Toy/Lex vehicles and get tired of the endless bashing at the hands of Autospies and countless German mags.

Some headlines (most from 009, natch)
"Tundra gets another black eye"
"Scion xB is a little porker"
"is Toyota's success really good for the US economy"
"Regular cars can beat hybrids"
"Audi set to beat Lexus..."
"Why is Lexus afraid to turn the heat up on BMW"
"Lean Enterprise president warns about Toyota's future"

And of course there is every negative review from AutoBild and other Gemran mags. When was the last time someone posted a review from Asia? I havent even researched it myself, so I shouldnt complain, but it is worth pointing out.



S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/18/2007 12:23:34 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Well, as I think you should know, I do not personally dislike Toyota/Lexus products-- it's just the trolls who constantly defend them that make me rant. I don't know what to say about the negative titles; that's what happens when you're successful. I don't think it's jealousy, per se, but it truly is a better way to gain article traffic. Imagine how little posters would be here if the title was "Acura Has Two Cars on IIHS Top Safety Picks 2007."

And, you must acknowledge that there have been positive articles from German magazines regarding Toylex products; or at least I do, because every time one of them comes up, the Lexus fans never fail to rub it in our faces. Take the recent LS600hL vs. S600 article, for instance. The LS didn't win (nor did the S600), but the magazine liked the car, so they commenced bragging.



JAYQ0401JAYQ0401 - 5/17/2007 2:29:06 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"But the problem is Toyota and Lexus claim to be the leaders in the market. So shouldn't a leader also lead in the most critical aspect?"

The fan club swears by toyota as a savior to mankind and their immense superiority. With such deep pockets they have no excuse.




reply to this comment
answeranswer - 5/17/2007 2:57:58 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Please show an example of a Lexus or Toyota ad/press release where they state that they are the safety leaders of the car industry.

I've never seen one.



enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/17/2007 7:23:43 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
it's true that recent lexus advertising has been showing accidents and proclaiming how innovative the safety features are on their cars. so they should be measuring up to those lofty claims.


enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/18/2007 12:03:25 AM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
lexusadmirer:

there are three i have seen recently:
* an RX that starts with a boy in a hospital and then shows that the accident could have been avoided.
* another one with the RX
* a website called 'activelysafe.com' that glorifies the safety of the RX (take a look, it's still up)
* an tv ad i just saw yesterday that shows an ES about to crash and the pre-safe system kicking in.

so these cars better be DAMN safe if they're claiming all that.



JAYQ0401JAYQ0401 - 5/17/2007 2:30:34 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Save the environment with hybrids, have a car self park, or better yet how about save a life.

reply to this comment
enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/18/2007 12:05:36 AM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
wow, you really buy the marketing hype. guess it works. that's why lexus spend 4X more on marketing that bmw or mercedes. more than $500MM/year in the US alone.


Agent009Agent009 - 5/17/2007 3:54:57 PMView My AgentSpace
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The article was a press release from the IIHS. So I think you may interpret their findings as inappropriate to your viewpoint, rather than a factual finding.

reply to this comment
JAYQ0401JAYQ0401 - 5/17/2007 4:08:35 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The safety ratings are only within the class. Its amazing how you know soooo many people hit by a Ford Excursion.....Actually you make it sound as though its 3 out of the ten Ford actually sold. Wild.

Any more tall stories.


reply to this comment
RupertRupert - 5/17/2007 7:10:16 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
The day I see a 160 mpg Excursion is the day I appear on Pimp My Ride.
As in NEVER.


reply to this comment
ctsangctsang - 5/17/2007 4:07:04 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Volvo and MB are supposedly safe cars. But they only manage 1 car each. I am very very surprised MB S class is not on the list and I just paid $90K for it, holy smoke.

reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/18/2007 12:26:33 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I doubt you just bought an S-Class, judging by the nature of your few posts...


ruetirueti - 5/17/2007 4:57:29 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
It is possible to design a car to target high safety test scores, too, knowing exactly what the tests are and how higher scores are attained. Trouble is, cars do not always have accidents as 'designed'... So, what is really a 'safe car'? These list are the cars scored highest based on their scoring system, which does not mean those not on the list are unsafe. In most cases, true differences are quite minor anyway.

reply to this comment
RupertRupert - 5/17/2007 7:08:37 PMView My AgentSpace
+6 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
This is odd - the Cr-V and A4 only have 4/5 EuroNCAP stars, yet apparently they lead here.
And of course, cars that have not been crashed yet (ie S class or LS) will not appear.


reply to this comment
huu76huu76 - 5/17/2007 7:16:55 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Where's the link. I'm sure there's more to this than what's posted.

Where's the small car category?


reply to this comment
1970toyotamarc1970toyotamarc - 5/17/2007 7:51:50 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Can I also point out that the original story is from November, 2006. Doesnt anyone remember????? I knew it sounded familiar so I looked up the IIHS website. This post only reports on a couple updates, vehicles (notably the 2008 Taurus and Sable) that did not qualify as top picks in 2007, but can now because ESC has become standard. It has nothing to do with Toyota or Lexus.

The list only reflects the vehicle that have ESC, on top of good results on tests. Many vehicles, Toyotas among others, would have been eligible for top picks based on their scores, but do not offer ESC. (Thats also why no small cars were picked)

From the original report.....
"Seventeen other vehicles would have won 2007 awards if they had good seat/head restraint designs. Toyota could have claimed nine TOP SAFETY PICK awards, including three Lexus winners."

Is 009 going to post each update as each new vehicle gets ESC and therefore can claim its prize? I doubt it.


reply to this comment
Designer1Designer1 - 5/17/2007 9:43:46 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Agent009, I don't know what to say. lol
Your articles are just horrible man. I'm really tired of responding to your articles, but I still went a head and got one small example from the http://www.iihs.org site.

So, people go a head for yourself and look at these two links, one is for the Audi A6
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=275

And the other Camry.
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=291

And look for yourself that the rating is the same, actually A6 only improved to Good in 2005-2007 models, before that it was Acceptable, where as the Camry has been holding the Good mark since 1997 year to now.

So people, this is my example of bad editors in the automobile industry now days, Agent009.

Beside the crash tests, I want to know when is Ford going to stick with a name for its Taurus? one day is, NOT 500, but Fivehundred. lool

Now seriously, seriourly just imagine who was that FOOL that came up with that name and decided to write the number as a word and not a number? It almost took half the trunk just for the word, Fivehundred, to fit in. And yet that's another example of Ford horrible managment.

Anyhow, for people to know if a car is safe Agent009, they wouldn't listen to you, but they have the site http://www.iihs.org to go to and see for themselves.

See I said I won't respond to you but damn it I still did. I hope you won't get mad, I'm sure you're a good fellow, just try to be fair, and no my point isn't only about Toyota, but all unmentioned cars.



reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 5/18/2007 12:28:59 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Why would you compare a Toyota Camry to an Audi A6?

The A3, A4, A6 and Q7 have all recieved the highest ratings possible from the IIHS.



Agent009Agent009 - 5/18/2007 11:47:41 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
You are entitled to your opinion, as am I. But keep in mind in this case we are a purveyor of information not necessarily the author so the author bears the recousrse if any information is incorrect.

However since this post came DIRECTLY from the IIHS, I have to say that you my friend are incorrect or at don't have all of the details. If you differ with the scientific results the ask the IIHS for clarification.



Agent009Agent009 - 5/18/2007 11:40:51 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
mitchatlexusofmarin- I understand you have a problem when I post negatives about Lexus, that is natural. No one wants to see negatives about thier marque, but I do it to other brands as well, take the Passat fire investigation.

So basically if I see a recall or bad press about any brand I will post it asd newsworthy. The same goes for the positives. Probably 80% of the headlines are written from the orginating poster not me, but I reserve the right to "polish" some to spur comments as in this case.

The simple fact is if any marque is put on a pedistal it opens itself for pot shots. If KIA was number one everyone would be taking aim at it. I guess it is the American way. So since Toyota/Lexus is number one in sales in many areas, and arguably the best out there as well. They will be the subject of good and bad press, it is unavoidable.

If you don't like seeing both the good and the bad then avoid the temptation of reading the negatives. More good on Toyota/Lexus has been posted by this site than negatives. For goodness sake 001 has posted several well deserved glowing reviews of his latest long term Lexus test vehicle.

So my suggestion is you have to understand this is not a Lexus or BMW or Mercedes centric site, there are plenty of those that specialize in touting only the virtues of a marque. We will continue to tell the goos and the bad, regardless of the marque.



reply to this comment
Agent009Agent009 - 5/18/2007 12:01:49 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
mitchatlexusofmarin- Oops I forgot one thing. You see a lot of my postings because I got out and look for them. You also see a lot of other content from other contributors.

But please keep in mind I turn down over 70% of submissions simply because of the inflammatory nature. I see daily articles submitted that are basically bogus opinions stating “brand A is better than brand B because I think so”. You never see that aspect, but occasionally one does have a valid point and it is approved and allowed through

So keep in mind the big picture and remember that if the content is sincere and plausible you probably will see it. If it is just a slam session you never see it.

I’ll give you an example is scanning my logs I have turned down 43 articles this month that were to slam Toyota or Lexus as inappropriate. Is also scanned this week which was a slow Toyota/Lexus week and found we approved 2 neutral articles, 10 positive articles and 4 negative. So if you look at the score you are doing pretty darn good.


reply to this comment
enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/20/2007 2:34:52 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
for the record i don't hate lexus.
what i can't stand are lexus fans who try to make the brand what it isn't.

lexus are great cars for people who like quiet, comfy, reliable luxury cars. no surprise that lexus buyers average much older than mercedes or bmw.

it's you lexus fans who think that lexus are style leading performance cars that make me nuts. they're not.


reply to this comment
huu76huu76 - 5/20/2007 1:16:09 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Lexusadmirer,
Enthusiast probably just made it up, he has a habit of doing that hoping no one will call his bluff. Believe me, I know all too well how he posts.


reply to this comment
enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/20/2007 2:32:17 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
what exactly did i make up?

didn't you go to activelysafe.com, the lexus site i told you about? and the ads i mentioned are very much real. the one with the boy in the hospital that shows how a crash can be avoided is actually pretty cool. the other RX spot and the ES spot showing a crash aren't nearly as good.



enthusiastx11enthusiastx11 - 5/20/2007 2:35:44 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
just watch some tv...the ES spot is running like crazy right now.


huu76huu76 - 5/20/2007 4:22:02 PM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
www.activesafe.com Nice of you to pull that out of nowhere after the fact. But anyway...

What exactly am I supposed to be looking at?
First, the domain is for sale.
Secondly, it looks to be hocking dating services, apartments and a whole host of crap I don't want to be bothered with.

btw, I haven't got a clue what anyone is talking about since I posted saying the link seems suspicious.


reply to this comment

To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Swedish Government Confirms Discussions With Volvo and SAABBMW not putting MINI E into mass-productionTop Gear Car of the Year 2008 award goes to VW SciroccoNew Mitsubishi Lancer EVO X FQ-400: Limited Edition with 405HP2009 Nissan 370Z Driven in Japan2010 Jaguar XF-R spotted nearly finishedUAW wants limits on carmakers' executive payDoes It Hurt The BMW Brand Image When They Are Being Sold At Costco?2008 Essen Motor Show: Vw unveils Touareg North Sails EditionCarlsson releases limited edition automatic watchVideo: 2009 Mini Cooper Cabrio in actionPorsche Museum to open its gates on 31 January 2009Vw Eos White Night Edition unveiled at EssenUPDATE 1-German carmakers make fresh move to cut outputAudi R8 GT3 LMS Hits the Track (Video)GM UK takes two Top Gear awardsBMW Konfigurator Using Microsoft Surface for Product NavigatorHow About A Piece Of Kim Kardashian's Booty For The Holidays?Cars They Wish You'd Forget About - "Hey, they can't all be winners!"Acura V8 won't Arrive Until 2015: ReportBrabham M3 revealed at the Essen Show2008 Essen Motor Show: Dodge Challenger SRT8 by EibachNissan 370 Z Japanese Promotional VideElite Carbon Maserati Gran TurismoMarangoni M430 based on Alfa Romeo Mi.To2008 VW Scirocco Collectors’ Edition debuts at EssenFord at the top of the list for safety in accidentsBamford releases custom Rolex Daytona Ferrari red watchRolls-Royce RR4 to reveice Bmw’s iDrive technology2009 Vw Golf VI by ABT shows up at EssenConfessions of A Test Drive Junkie: Funny Experiences & Observations Behind The Wheel of Other People's Cars!Nissan changes its mind regarding the 2009 Chicago Auto ShowNew details of the next-generation of Audi A2 revealedTop 10 Most Popular Sport Utility PicksFar From Perfect? Mercedes-Benz ML320 BlueTec Diesel SUVQuestion Of the Day: Just How Long Will Gas Stay This Cheap?A New Maserati Quattroporte With A $35K Black Friday Discount? And The Spies Say DON'T Buy It?Confirmed: Audi To Replace R10 With R15 TDi In 2009GM Asks FAA To Keep Jet Movements ConfidentialBMW And German Brands Worry Openly About the Biggest Crisis Since WWIIShould Detroit Rebuild Itself Around the Slovakian Manufacturing Model?Reflections on the Acura NSXFirst Photos And Full Rundown on the new MINI ConvertibleIn Keeping With The Thanksgiving Theme, Which Was The Biggest TURKEY Of A Vehicle You've Owned?Chinese automakers replacing big names at the 2009 Detroit Auto ShowEuropean regulations could outlaw ultra-wide high-performance tiresNone of the big carmakers will miss the 2009 Geneva Motor Show2009 Bmw Z4 coming on December 15Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4_e receives Stop/Start TechnologyHyundai’s fuel efficiel fleet coming in 2015



<