BMWBlog
BMWBlog
View My AgentPage

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Tags: bmw, idrive, bmw 3 series, facelift, bmw 5 series

Tag Links: bmw, idrive, bmw 3 series, facelift, bmw 5 series

Update: 2009 BMW 3 Series WILL NOT get the new iDrive system
A few days ago, we have posted in article in which we proudly announced that the 2009 BMW 3 Series will get the new, update and improved iDrive system. The exciting news were posted on most of the major car blogs and at the time, and everyone got excited about it, including us.

Previous article: http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/04/20/bmw-3-series-to-get-a-better-idrive

Even though we knew that BMW usually keeps the goodies for their new, completely redesigned models, we thought that things might be different now.

Well, apparently, nothing has changed in the way BMW plans everything. Very well informed sources have shared with us that the new iDrive system will definitely NOT be in the 2009 BMW 3 Series facelift. The improved iDrive system will be part of the 5 Series and it is currently being tested in the 5 series mules.

Sorry to dissapoint you guys, but apparently we need to wait a little longer until we'll get to use the new system.

 Read Article



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]
AudiphileAudiphile - 4/23/2008 11:59:38 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
lexusrox123lexusrox123 - 4/24/2008 9:06:38 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
now they figure out that nobody likes the overcomplicated control system anymore. good riddance


NItePhireNItePhire - 4/23/2008 1:22:27 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Just give me a few multi-function buttons please. You can keep the Idriveunuts controller.

reply to this comment
Ironman273Ironman273 - 4/23/2008 1:26:11 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
That's strange that the picture shows it in a 3 interior, not anything resembling a 5 interior. I guess the 5 interior is dramatically changing too.

reply to this comment
mscottc1mscottc1 - 4/23/2008 1:34:56 PM
+7 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
go ahead and de-boost me, but I love the current (most up-to-date) version of i-Drive. You can do nearly anything in the car's entertainment or nav functions without taking your eyes off the road. Maybe I'm nuts, but I found it very intuitive to use also.

reply to this comment
M53RM53R - 4/23/2008 2:32:50 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Exactly. Only grandfathers complain about idrive.


AnthonyAnthony - 4/23/2008 5:16:32 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
There is a slightly larger learning curve when first using iDrive as opposed to buttons, which frustrates many people who do not want to learn a new system. Many simply prefer pressing ONE button for a function, instead of rotating a wheel back and forth and clicking 5 times for the same function.

Yes, it is nitpicky, but also understandable.


M53RM53R - 4/23/2008 7:17:15 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
But when you get used to idrive, life without it seems difficult. Especially ones with a million buttons on the dash!


SteveSteve - 4/23/2008 6:22:57 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
With each new iteration of iDrive, BMW answers the question "How many times can you polish a turd?"

reply to this comment
MonkMonk - 4/23/2008 8:19:50 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Well you can blame Microsoft for the poor usability.
It made it.

reply to this comment
SteveSteve - 4/24/2008 10:30:39 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
> Well you can blame Microsoft for the poor [iDrive]
> usability. It made it.

Really? My understanding is that it's a BMW specification, and BMW design, and that the hardware and operating system are Microsoft. Based on this, it's like blaming Microsoft for every bad app that runs on a Windows PC.


bobs4statebobs4state - 4/23/2008 9:43:19 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Most, but not all, of the people who do not like the current version of iDrive are people who do not own a car with it. They base their judgements on one or two hours of exposure to it. We found after some time, that iDrive is very powerful. Sure, Acura's are easier to use, but they don't have half of the functionality as a BMW with iDrive.

reply to this comment
KingerKinger - 4/24/2008 4:39:24 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I would say the majority of people who bash iDrive hacve never even used it, they just read an article in a magazine from some journalist that used for an hour and concluded it was crap. :/ There's a learning curve with iDrive and most people just aren't bothered putting in the time to do that. The majority of people who have put in the time to learn the system really enjoy using it and would never go back to a dash clustered with buttons.


bulldogzbulldogz - 4/24/2008 7:49:42 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Kinger, that hour they use it is called a "test drive", and it makes it alot harder to sell someone on a $50k car when they have to "learn" how to do something in 4-6 steps that was all of 2 buttons (not a million M53R) before just to clean up the dash. I had a 5-series loaner for a week and simply ended up using the dash buttons more than I-drive. I'm still getting used to the Audi MMI system, sometimes you just can't have your eyes off the road that long if you don't know EXACTLY where the feature is you're looking for.


SteveSteve - 4/24/2008 10:51:13 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
In the mid 1980s, musical instrument synthesizer manufacturers first started deploting the iDrive approach to their user-interface, and that is relatively few controls, a large LCD screen, and a menu-driven, parameter-value entry system. They did it for exactly the same reasons as BMW: To reduce control clutter, to increase functionality, and to lower costs.

It didn't take long for manufacturers to detect a trend: Most of these synths that came in for repairs had the factory settings! That was because they had become too complicated to program for most musicians. But the biggest downfall, was that musicians used to use all those knobs and sliders on the old synths for spontaneous, real-time control inputs, and the new approach really sucked for that.

Fast forward a few decades to iDrive. A big complaint that users have of iDrive, even the several-generations-later, dummied-down-for-our-simpleton-drivers version, is that it is too complex to learn for most people. And yes, I agree with some posters, that there are people on this forum who are adept at it. But by comparison, there are frightfully few people who own computers, and who can set them up and maintain them themselves. Most computer users feel computers are complex.

But the bigger issue, is that iDrive, like the synthesizers from 20 years back that first ventured in this direction, is a user-interface into a rich "programming" environment, but which is very suboptimal for real-time user-control of a device. Put into laymens' terms, it sucks at doing stuff in real-time. For example, in the old days, if you wanted to turn down the bass on the radio (not invoke a specific equalization preset), you would turn a knob counter-clockwise. This was true even if you had just finished changing the air-conditioner fan speed. With iDrive, you have to navigate several menus to get out of the climate control "page" and into the radio "page", select the "bass" paramter, then decrease its value.

Some will argue "no big deal." And for you, it's not! But it *is* a big deal for people who think this is complex. It's also a big deal if you're a MMI (Man-Machine Interface) specialist, who can articulate with great detail and specificity, why the iDrive approach, and iDrive specifically, is suboptimal for real-time user-control of motor vehicle functions.


S2000VS911S2000VS911 - 4/23/2008 11:24:32 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
please use TOUCH SCREEN instead. Hopefully they didn't sign 20yr contract to Microsoft.

reply to this comment
MunichRobMunichRob - 4/24/2008 6:27:50 AMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I hate touch screens compared to systems that use a mouse like controller. Touch screens are a pain in the ass & they get dirty, I've got one in my Jeep & I hate it. I can't tell you how much I prefer the i-drive in my Bimmer, it was way easier to learn how to use, it has a better interface, & it's basically like scrolling through an i-pod.

Now granted Chrysler/Jeep has about the worst, or at least one of the most complicated Nav systems in the industry, I've spent plenty of time in my buddies Acura TL & while it's Navi's way easier to use than the Jeeps, it's still less convenient than the i-drive.

reply to this comment
bmwfan1513bmwfan1513 - 4/24/2008 7:34:59 AM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Top 10 Vehicles with Highest-Precentage of Male DriversVideo: Extreme testing for the 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLKDodge Challenger drag-racing version coming soonOne, Two, Three! Did Acura Strike Out With The TSX?Alfa Romeo unveils Mille Miglia Special EditionIs This Fair? GM Cancels Health Benefits For Striking WorkersExpect to pay over $90,000 for the Nissan GT-RInsanity? Audi Decides That 580hp In a RS6 Just Isn't Enough, 613hp On It's Way2011 BMW 1-series spy imagesThe Audi A6 scoopAC Schnitzer MINI Clubman SVolvo spices up its V70 wagon with R-Design packageWorld's first test of A4 fighter: 2009 Acura TSX Ford Mustang Bullitt Review (video)All-New Ford Flex poised to deliver a quiet rideVideo: V10-Powered R8 Spotted On The RoadComparison: 2008 BMW X6 xDrive35i vs. 2009 Infiniti FX35 AWDModern Street Car System Proposed for Dallas - BUT WOULD YOU RIDE???VW TIGUAN at DEALERS NOW - Ready for YOU???FUNNY COMMERCIALS INVOLVING CARS - Is it just Me, or are these Funny???Video: First 2010 Mercedes-Benz commercialGM may not offer Cadillac CTS Convertible2009 Ford Escape - First DriveHigh Gas Prices: Are We Actually Sitting On A Gas Bubble?Audi Takes Inventor Of The Year Award For Use Of Space Frame TechnologyVideo: Lotus Eagle Spied Testing on the RingSpied: 2010 Audi TT ClubsportWhat Is The Most Prestigious Brand?BMW testing cars with solar panelsVolt mules already getting 40 miles on electric only!The 2009 VW Tiguan SUV Is Nice- But Does It Have A Chance In Hell Against The New Honda CR-V?Video: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V around the Nurburgring in 7:59.32Video: Jaguar XF Supercharged vs. BMW 550i, Mercedes E550, Audi A6AC Schnitzer's 226-hp MINI Cooper Clubman SMazda1 minicar concept coming to Paris with Nagari design style2009 Hyundai Sonata and 2008 Chevrolet Malibu More Fuel-Efficient than Toyota Camry and Honda AccordAudi R8 V10 Video -spotted in the Wild Paul McCartney 's New LS600H Emits More CO2 In Transport Than It Will Ever Save!RECALL WEDNESDAY: Ford Is Looking For 655,000 F-150s For Brake IssuesAudi R8 V10 ConfirmedNext Pagani Zonda to be powered by supercharged V8 from McLaren SLRReaders Sound off: Doesn't mobile internet belong on your phone? BMW doesn't think so...When Is It Safe To Buy A New Or Redesigned Car Model? Chrysler kills plans for new Dodge Journey, will produce small car insteadM3 vs RS4- The Winner May Not Be The One You Want To OwnBMW European Delivery: Amazing Photos from GermanySpied: 2010 Mercedes E63 AMGWill The New X6 Really Damage BMW's Reputation?Leaked: Nissan 370 Z shows upRocky Mountain High Colorado! 001 Spies The 2009 VW Tiguan SUV