Agent009
Agent009
"I sincerely thank you for the warning. Now I'm off to sharpen my pitchfork."
View My AgentSpace

Print this Page | Digg It | del.icio.us

Who Could It Be? BMW Says It Is Open To Buying Another Brand
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG said it is open to acquisitions and that it has examined the possibility of acquiring a car brand from its rivals, but none currently meet its acquisition criteria.

But BMW chief executive Norbert Reithofer said 'acquisitions in principle remain on our agenda'.

'For possible acquisitions in the future, we have clearly defined criteria in the strategy process. That way, we can act swiftly when needed,' he said.

Reithofer spoke at the start of a news conference, which was convened as the company disclosed details of a long-term strategy aimed at boosting profitability.

Read Article
Who Could It Be? BMW Says It Is Open To Buying Another Brand



Comments:

Images hosted in your AgentSpace can now be posted in the comments section using the following syntax (case matters):
[img]IMAGE URL[/img]
Example: [img]http://agent004.myautospies.com/users/150/Sample-Gallery/sample1.JPG[/img]
00Vegas00Vegas - 9/27/2007 12:39:31 PM
-1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Right... because the Land Rover deal worked out so well for them...

reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 9/27/2007 10:18:59 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
That's what Xdrive implied. Re-read his comment.


KingerKinger - 9/27/2007 12:51:47 PM
+4 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
True, and Ford might be willing to off-load Mazda in light of their recent troubles.

reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 9/27/2007 10:20:41 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
"Both are tuned to driving and Mazada is not a generica Japanese brand like Honda and Toyota."

And Mazda may actually be in reach of BMW. Toyota or Honda would be far too expensive.

I don't think BMW should do this. The three brands they have right now are good fits- but they don't need a volume brand, and they certainly don't need Volvo. Either one would give way to platform sharing, and you know how much die-hard BMW fans hate that. It's the one thing they can brag about not having.

reply to this comment
BentleyGTBentleyGT - 9/27/2007 1:40:41 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think BMW should buy Jaguar.

reply to this comment
w209w114w209w114 - 9/27/2007 2:24:29 PMView My AgentSpace
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Exactly what I was thinking. Prob not though after that bad experience with Range Rover


jeffy210jeffy210 - 9/27/2007 1:41:06 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
<troll> maybe they should buy Lexus and put it out of it's misery once and for all </troll>

reply to this comment
EL34EL34 - 9/27/2007 2:07:37 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
If BMW bought Lexus those folks could finally get free maintenance.

reply to this comment
MercedesKingMercedesKing - 9/27/2007 6:36:44 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
EL34, if you donated your body to the University of California, UC Irvine would finally get some free manure-based fertilizer.


KingerKinger - 9/28/2007 10:34:46 AM
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Wow, Lexus cars never need to be serviced? Amazing...


mini22mini22 - 9/27/2007 2:43:29 PM
+3 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Jaguar is not Rover. It does have a high quality quotient and is rated well now with JD Power. The only issue is it's products directly compete with BMW products. Its one thing if they are priced significantly above BMW(like Rolls) or below like (Mini). Why not somthing like Peugeot or Citroen.BMW already shares engine technology with them and it's FWD. Volvo could have worked as well.Both can be positioned below BMW.Unless they want to revive the Triumph brand.It all depends if they are going for volume sales or limited higher end. I predict volume is where they want to go.They can always make a lower priced Rolls to compete with Bentley.

reply to this comment
AudiphileAudiphile - 9/27/2007 4:58:36 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Well said, mini22. Ford would love to unload Jaguar, but unfortunately Jaguar is a direct competitor of BMW. BMW and Rolls-Royce cover the "high end" of the market, and Mini covers the "low-end" quite nicely, so a "middle-market" manufacturer is what is needed. You are right about Volvo being a better match, and Ford might be willing to sell Volvo as well, but Ford and Volvo are involved in so many joint ventures that a sale would be difficult at this time. The only mass-market European manufacturer that is not already part of a megafirm (i.e.,VW, Renault, FIAT, etc.) is Peugeot-Citroen. They might also want to consider buying a good Japanese firm like Mazda or Subaru. (After all, Renault's acquisition of Nissan was a success.)

By the way, Rolls-Royce and Bentley are already expanding their model lines. Rolls is working on a car that is smaller and cheaper than the Phantom, and Bentley is planning to introduce in 2009 (or 2010) a brand-new large car to replace the Arnage. (Why anyone would want a car larger than the Bentley Continental Flying Spur is beyond me, but such a market does exist.)


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 9/27/2007 10:22:07 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Peugeot-Citroen certainly is part of a "megafirm;" it's called PSA. PSA is also highly involved with Nissan. The French brands wouldn't make much sense for BMW.


S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 9/27/2007 10:23:13 PMView My AgentSpace
+2 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
BTW, Subaru is owned by Toyota and I don't see Ford dumping Mazda anytime soon- the 6 and 3 platforms are integral in the realm of FoMoCo.


BM3WBM3W - 9/27/2007 5:36:15 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I'm thinking it may be Lotus or TVR.

reply to this comment
S4cabriofoxoneS4cabriofoxone - 9/27/2007 10:24:16 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
TVR- perhaps. Never thought of it.

But Lotus is owned by Proton, and I don't think BMW would want to get involved with Proton. VW has considered buying Proton/Lotus and focusing on the Lotus brand, perhaps selling the Proton brand after. But I don't know if anything came of it.


GLoverGLover - 9/27/2007 9:10:13 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
cdokecdoke - 9/27/2007 11:04:53 PMView My AgentSpace
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
They had damned well better not buy Jaguar.

reply to this comment
MercedesKingMercedesKing - 9/27/2007 11:32:19 PM
0 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
I think Ford should ditch Mercury, Lincoln and Volvo and overextend Jaguar needlessly. Jaguar should become easily accessible.


mini22mini22 - 9/28/2007 11:59:55 AM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
S4-PSA is not part of Nissan at all. Renault owns majority shares in Nissan. PSA is a separate entity altogether. It is a remote possibility that BMW would look at PSA.I thought the French government was still part owner but I could be wrong on this. A Japanese aquisition is a possiblity but again remote. Mazda and Subaru are not going to be sold by Ford and Toyota.Unless there is a small Jap or Korean auto company that is not owned by a larger company that would be off the table. The more expensive route would be to start up a fourth brand. I would guess they most likely would resourect Triumph.We know Triumph from the sports cars they sold in the USA. However they did sell sedans in europe. I could see them setting up Triumph below BMW with RWD or FWD sedans and perhaps a new TR sports car.It's a known fact that BMW wants to expand its Oxford facility where it builds the Mini. The other option would be to expand Spartanburg NC facility in the US where it produces SUV's. This would certainly be a help for selling Triumph in the USA. So-I'm leaning towards Triumph as the 4th brand and perhaps Spartanburg as the plant to hedge against monetary currency issues.

reply to this comment
mini22mini22 - 9/28/2007 1:04:50 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
Also is the issue of luxury versus near luxury.The was recent articles that BMW shied away from Alfa/Volvo because it does not meet their criteria of another luxury brand. My take is that this is a smoke screen. BMW does NOT need another luxury brand. If they develop a lower price Rolls to compete with Bentley than there would be little point in it.We are talking about the 90-180 grand price range. The top of the line 7 series is already over the 100 grand range. The volume would be very small. I'm not sure of the point in setting up another small volume brand.BMW is looking for large expansion of up to 2 million cars a yr by 2015. The easiest way to get there is by going with a sporty near luxury brand because of the volume potential.

reply to this comment
ICONICON - 9/28/2007 2:34:03 PM
+1 BoostDrop the Boost Up the Boost
BMW's stated corporate criteria for product development as well as acquisitions is to only enter a market/product segment where they can offer the premium vehicle in that class.

Like they have done with the MINI, RR brands.

I don't see them going for a volume producer because it doesn't fit this stated criteria. That is one of the reasons Rover wasn't a fit and they only have to look at Mercedes experience with Chrysler to reinforce the lessons learned.

And as Porche has consistently shown, you don't have to be a volume producer to make outstanding profits.

That is why they will keep expanding the breadth and depth of the brands they already own. Makes sense to me.



reply to this comment
To post a comment for this story, you must first Login.

If you do not have an account, you will need to Register (It's Free!).

Most Recent Stories
Is Lexus Missing the Boat By Not Having a BMW CS Competitor?EVO Magazine: Nissan Skyline GT-R Birth Of An Icon 1989EVO Magazine Long Term Test: Mitsubishi Evo X FQ-300 SST.....More Exciting Then The M3?2009 Suzuki SX4 Special Edition With TRIPCarlsson Tuned Mercedes GL500 With 435HP2008 Bentley Continental GTS Black Edition by Project KahnBMW Puts Lexus and Mercedes on Notice - But Did BMW Go Far Enough With Their New 7-Series?Bigger and more powerful Prius in the works2008 Jaguar XKR Portfolio Limited Edition in AustraliaPorsche 911 Powered Trike Troubled Waters by Phoenix Trike WorksPeugeot Builds 50 Millionth Peugeot CarPaolo Martin’s rendering of what the Fiat Topolino should look likeBrazil receives a new Volkswagen Gol 2009 modelSeat reveals schedule until 2010, includes first ever Seat SUVBritish companies plan a new kinetic hybrid flywheel systemTata faces a rough ride as shares dropGordon Murrays T25 City Car SketchesInterior spy pictures of the next-generation BMW 5-seriesSpy pictures of the BMW X6 HybridNew Tatra concept revealed, the 903 concept modelOpel to feature the Insignia hatchback and sedan at the British Motor ShowThe Chevrolet Beat is being considered for the U.S marketBugatti wants a new model, maybe even a four-door-coupeToyota Canada Reduce Retail Prices on 11 ModelsMaybach Exelero Concept for sale for $7.8 millionDetails emerge on 2010 Toyota Prius, more power and better fuel-economy2009 Ford Focus RS images leaked before debutGM To Unleash Corvette S-Limited in JapanA Sneak Peek At Mercedes Benz's European SLR Code Name Z199Leaked Images Have Hit The Web But The Spies Are The First With Full Details Of The New 7-SeriesSTUD or DUD? The 2009 BMW 7 Series Leaks It Way On The WebMINI SUV to spawn a 5-door hatchbackThink June Sales Were Bad? Both GM and Toyota Say Their Sales Will Fall Even FurtherBMW 135i with carbon fiber partsMerrill says GM bankruptcy possibleAUTOEXPRESS UK: Jaguar XKR-S vs Audi R8 vs Nissan GT-RPorsche 997 TARGA Refresh Leaked Before LaunchAudi A5 3.2 Quattro ReviewToyota struggling to meet small car and hybrid demandNow Just What Would You Do For A Tank Of Gas?High Gas Prices Causing European Market DownturnThe Good The Bad And the Ugly - Who Will Rise And Who Will Fall In 2008?Video: New Lexus RX goes testing at Nurburgring2008 JE Design Audi Q7 Street Rocket2008 BMW Z0 Concept Design by Andrei Avarvarii2008 Lamberti LS1 ConceptThe New Kia Forte Sport Sedan2008 Volvo & DOE Expand Drivelines2008 Audi R8 DTM Safety CarB&B Tuned Audi TTS Sportcoupe With 362HP