$1,300,000 Maybach Landaulet...... If you had that money and didn't care, would you even consider this?

No. It's ugly and pretentious.

— daytonaviolet (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 2:03:21 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 8   

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....NO!

— SHOWTIME (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 2:07:00 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 7   

Yes. I would consider it. And I'd have a Jacuzzi installed in front of the rear seats and have all the chrome work done in gold plate.

— grysko (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 2:17:09 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

I saw that thing in person at the NAIAS -- it was hideous. No. If I wanted an ostentatious, ridiculously expensive convertible I'd get a Rolls Drophead, and if I needed the office on wheels too I could get a Phantom as a second car... and still SAVE half a million $$$ over the Laundelet, all while maintaining just as much, if not more, of the "look how rich I am" factor.

— JRobUSC (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 2:40:20 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 5   

Honestly, I would prefer the 62S over this car anyday. The theme of it seems to fit the Pope in my opinion.

— Carboy (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 4:06:28 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

Ummmmmm, driving this thing screams "thanks for the bailout, suckers"...

— AgentOrange (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 4:34:05 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

Uuhhhh...Hmmm...FUGLY for one and no I would rather buy a Baby Phantom

— Type707 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 5:28:59 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

why not? I would get it (especially saying if i had the money!!!)

— ThierryHenry14 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 8:15:42 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Hellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll No.
Money or not, That "Benz" is ugly! im not spend 1.ANYTHING on anything that shares parts, i might as well but an Acura!

— njsidekick3 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/24/2008 9:54:24 PM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

Give me an S65 AMG instead. Save myself 1.2 million.

— audirevolution (View Profile)

Posted on 10/25/2008 12:57:09 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 3   

LOL.........They are joking right? $1.2 million for this sup up Benz? Yeah right. If I had that of money to blow on cars, I would get the Bentley Continental GT-C instead.

Way better looking and are prestige than this Benz. Sorry to said it, but it the true, it just sup up Benz.

Like see with $1.2 millions, I can the following cars:

1) Aston Martin Vantage S
2) Aston Martin DBS
3) Lambo Gallardo
4) Ferrari F430
5) Lexus IS-F
6) BMW M3
7) Audi RS4

and probably still have some money to take the ladies to a fancy dinner or two ;-)

Lexus

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 10/25/2008 1:12:35 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

Correction it $1.3 million Not $1.2 million

— Lexus (View Profile)

Posted on 10/25/2008 1:13:15 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

this car is an abomination.
it's suited only for rappers, NFL players and other people with no taste.

— enthusiastx11 (View Profile)

Posted on 10/25/2008 2:25:32 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 2   

I would get a Maybach 62S and save $800,000 that car is mean for Mark Cuban, and the dude who own virgin records

— B7FAN (View Profile)

Posted on 10/27/2008 10:51:29 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1   

I think it's kind of ugly, so I wouldn't buy it for looks.

It may be luxurious and comfortable, but it doesn't look like $1.3M worth of luxury.

And most people don't know cars priced at this level, so they will be just as impressed with a $100K or $200K car as they would be with a $1.3M car, so it wouldn't be worth it for the prestige. The people who WOULD know about the value/exclusivity of this car probably have plenty of money of their own, and wouldn't be impressed.

So, adding it up: No + No + No = NO.

— DW1968 (View Profile)

Posted on 11/1/2008 1:36:09 AM | reply to this comment | Votes: 1